Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by rayznack, May 30, 2017.

  1. rayznack

    rayznack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    48
  2. Thanos36

    Thanos36 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
  3. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It brings the "we wuz kangz" narrative into question.
     
    Wildjoker5 likes this.
  4. Thanos36

    Thanos36 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18

    Isn't race realism just the white version of "we was kangz"
     
    Lil Mike likes this.
  5. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Scientists have extracted and analyzed DNA from mummies that are thousands of years old, and they have found that the ancient Egyptians are actually more genetically similar to people living today in the Near East — countries like Israel, Lebanon, and Syria — than modern-day Egyptians.


    For a long time, we thought that mummies preserved no DNA. In 2010, a team analyzedancient DNA from 16 royal mummies, but the method they used wasn’t very good at distinguishing actual mummy DNA from modern DNA that might have contaminated it over the years. In a study published today in the journal Nature Communications, scientists used a new, more precise method of DNA sequencing to analyze genome data from several mummies spanning different time periods in ancient Egyptian history.

    The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE. There was no usable genetic material in any of the remaining soft tissue, but some left in the bones and teeth. Ninety of these mummies had incomplete DNA, and only three retained a completely intact genome. These three mummies are the ones the scientists focused on.

    The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes. Study lead author Johannes Krause told Science that the modern-day variation might be because either the spread of Islam or more trade increased contact between the different parts of Africa.


    The DNA sequencing method used in the study makes the results robust. The researchers looked at any DNA in a given sample, and then isolated the genetic material that might be human. The team then looked for patterns of DNA damage we only see in true ancient DNA, allowing them to ignore the DNA that might be from contamination.


    The findings are interesting, but even more promising is the fact that the method could pave the way for even more genetic studies of mummies so we can understand more details about these ancient people.











    NEXT UP IN SCIENCE
     
  6. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't think so. Race realism is just the belief that certain races have different strengths and weaknesses based on genetic and environmental differences.
     
  7. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,271
    Likes Received:
    22,660
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was funny!

    What would that be called, "We wuz Vikings?"
     
  9. ThirdTerm

    ThirdTerm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,318
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    83
    [​IMG]
    Supplementary Data 3

    The new study (Schuenemann et al. 2017) found that the two mummy samples belong to Y-DNA haplogroup J, which is common in the Middle East, and JK2911 has haplogroup E1b1b1, which is essentially an African haplogroup (see the map below). Overall, the ancient Egyptian samples showed certain genetic affinities with modern-day East Africans such as Ethiopians and the ancient Egyptians may have originated from the Horn of Africa. The data above further shows that the three ancient Egyptian samples JK2134, JK2888 and JK2911 belong to mtDNA haplogroups J1d, U6a2 and M1a1, respectively. J1d and its subclades are considered Near Eastern and U6a2 is close to the East African cluster U6a2a. The majority of the M1a lineages found outside and inside Africa had a more recent eastern African origin (González et al. ‎2007).

    [​IMG]

     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2017

Share This Page