Muslim kids in Philadelphia chanting about chopping off heads. Media is SILENT!

It's funny because it's Islamophobic

 

Hmmm ~ somehow, I missed your question earlier.

Sic is a grammatical term. It means that a certain term has been used erroneously. For many on the far right, they claim to be "Christian". But their conduct and beliefs are antithetical to everything that embodies a true Christian.

In the past I have posted photos of Catholic clergy members and Hitler. I have also posted photos of American righties with Pat Robertson. In each instance, professing Christians and antichrists are together which means none of those in the pics are true Christians at all.

Thus, the "sic" denotes the fact that while some righties (not all) believe themselves to be Christians when they are not.

 

Read the Koran. You will see (as I have posted on this forum before) that it refers to the Bible as "the Book". This means that in the Islamic religion the Bible is considered sacred as are its characters such as Moses and Jesus.

 

Source it.

Big difference is between threaten a group of people but nobody specifically, and specifically threaten people.
But I guess it's a problem for nazi's who demand they can yell crap about the Jews, like they do in the US.

It was for international diplomacy, denuclearization, and his constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges.
The stuff the Dotard abruptly all ended. But I guess some people can't look past him being black.

 

Again, if Islam is so evil towards women, why are the vast majority of European and American converts into that religion female? How does that compare to Hinduism where millions of females have been killed while the world looks the other way???

Yes, it is true that Islam is homophobic all too often. But that is the same with Christianity and Hindusim.

And while it is true that Christians have been persecuted by Muslims, the reverse is true more often. No greater example can be made than that of traitor Bush whose imperialism killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. Add to this the Russian invasion of Chechnya, Georgia, Dagestan, and its imperialism all over the Caucasus. Hundreds of thousands have died because of Christian [sic] colonialism. So where is the criticism from forum righties???

As for persecution of Jews, sadly, that is one of history's worse evils. But nobody has done it more than Christians and it continues to this day: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/6-million-more-holocaust-event/


I condemn all evil racial/ethnic hatred and have done so repeatedly on this forum. All I ask of forum righties is to stop being hypocrites and of being so selective in their prejudices. Therefore, it is time for you on the far right to apply the same standard towards Christians and Hindus as you do towards Muslims. If you had any real principle, you would do so.

 

No, it was only because he's black. Ask Obama yourself. He was embarrassed by the whole thing.

 

Probably quite a few reasons.
First and formost is the Muslims lying about the religion.
They do not tell the converts muhammed was a murderer, thief, rapist, slave trader, sexual pervert.
Instead, they invent a story about some religious person.
If they told them the truth about Muhammed, nobody would join.

 

Proof? Oh by the way, a large percentage of these females converts are college educated.

 

Unlikely, but They don't teach Muhammed in college.

Hell, you don't even know about Muhammed.

 

I think he would say that some far right white extremists can't stand the succes of black people.

 

Extremists from all groups can't stand lots of others.
Black panthers can't stand whites.
Either can the Nation of Islam.
Hardly something to judge all people on.

 

Well, if you really and truly want to know I am certain you can find the appropriate quotes from his own mouth and then you can come back and tell me that I was right.

 

There is no such thing as "Islamophobic". Perhaps you have a personal definition you can explain?

 

Source? The information is everywhere.
https://www.economist.com/charlemagne/2013/05/25/is-the-integration-of-immigrants-failing

https://billmuehlenberg.com/2017/12/03/islam-immigration-death-sweden/

 

What does that suggest to you?

 

It is true that some Christians believe homosexuality is a sin, and oppose Gay marriage, but that is far different from dropping homosexuals from rooftops as ISIS does or hanging them like Iran does.

The claim that Muslims have been persecuted by Christians more often than the other way around is completely false. Islam was founded in the 620s AD, and immediately began attacking its Pagan, Christian and Jewish neighbors. "Muhammad, unlike Christ, was a man of violence, he bore arms, was wounded in battle and preached holy war, Jihad, against those who defied the will of God as revealed to him." - noted
British military historian John Keegan, 'A History of Warfare.' Those areas in the Middle East and North Africa which had been Christian under the Roman and Byzantine Empires were conquered 'by the sword.'
Muslim invaders then crossed the Straits of Gibralter to invade Spain, and then France. They were finally defeated at the Battle of Tours in 732 by Charles Martel. After that, Muslim aggression was directed
at the Byzantine Empire, with Asia Minor first being overrun. It was in response to continous Muslim aggression that the Emperor Alexius Comnenus begged for help from Western Europe. In response, Pope
Urban II called for what became the First Crusade in 1096. The Crusades lasted until 1291, and virtually all of the battles were fought on ground previously conquered from Christians by the Muslims.

With the end of the Crusades, Muslim aggression against the West immediately resumed. Greece was invaded and Constantinople, having resisted fanatical attacks by Muslims in 673, 678, and 717, finally fell
in 1453. The Muslim Ottoman Turks then tried repeatedly to conqueror more and more territory in Europe, subjugating the Hungry and the rest of the Balkans with the utmost violence and cruelty for
generations. Many Muslim conquests were accompanied by forced conversions, massacres and enslavement. Finally the Muslim wars of aggression were brought to an end by their failed sieges of
Vienna in 1529 and 1683. Islam had been surpassed in military development and stagnated. The Muslim reign of terror that had beset the West with violence, slaughter and slavery for a thousand years
did not end even then. Muslim Barbary pirates carried off over one million Europeans into slavery before finally being subdued in the 1800s.

The Muslim Ottoman Empire turned its violence against Christians living within its boundaries - the remnants of conquered peoples. In their new book 'The Thirty Year Genocide' authors Benny Morris
and Dror Ze'evi relate how the Ottomans in the period of 1894 to 1924, reduced the Christians from 20% of the population to a mere 2 %. In the Armenian Genocide of 1915 alone, more than
a million and a half Christians were murdered. This massacre inspired Hitler to carry out the Holocaust. When asked what the future would think of eliminating the Jews, Hitler said "After all, who
remembers the Armenians?"

Nor are such atrocities confined to the past. In the 1990s, Muslim fanatics overthrew the democratically elected government in Sudan and tried to force the 30% of the population which was Christian
or animist to convert. In ten years, over a million innocent people were killed and as many as 250,000 were taken as slaves. Those enslaved were subjected to starvation, rape and torture in an
effort to convert them. Many of them were children. NEWSWEEK, May 3, 1999, reported, "The victims are black Christians and animists: the slave traders who raid the southern villages are Muslim
Arabs, whose racial and religious kin control the central government in Khartoum. Journalists and human-rights groups have documented the resurgence of slavery in Sudan, but that has done
nothing to reverse the trend."

The low tech nature of terroism has allowed Islam to off-set the West's technological superiority and resume its tradition of violence and aggression. On September 19, 2006, my local newspaper,
THE SARATOGIAN reported, "Al-Qaida in Iraq warned Pope Benedict XVI on Monday that its war against Christainity and the West will go on until Islam takes over the World." That, I believe,
is the dream that beats in most Muslim hearts, regardless of how many innocent lives they must destroy along the way.

 

In this case... these people:


They hate that "halve breed" "muslim", hence you get all that nonsense of why he got that nobel peace price. It's the same kind of folks.

 

Or this one.

New Black Panthers call for killing all white people…

Except it's not racist when blacks do it.

If a White racist group calls for the killing of all Black people, what do you think the Obama regime and the media would do?

And what if it turns out that none other than the sitting President of the United States himself had participated in and spoken before a rally of this same White racist group, would this shocking news be all over TV news and the print media?

Well, just such a racist group is doing that, but you’ve neither heard, watched, nor read about it. The reason is simple:

It’s a Black racist group that is calling for the killing of all White people.
Trending: VIDEO: Cory Booker is a sh!thole

The group is the New Black Panther Party — with whom Barack Obama had marched and before whom he spoke, during a campaign stop in Selma, Alabama in March 2007 (see photo below).

 

Personal? How about you pick up a dictionary?
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/islamophobic

 

That's not about unfettered people, now is it?

 

Hmmm

All this time I thought it was an excuse for criticizing Islam.
Or an excuse not to answer questions.

Or an answer to any Islamic question by an idiot.

 

Doesn't make it a real word. The Islam part is understandable but they misrepresent the meaning of 'Phobia'. It's described as 'an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something'.

There is every reason to have an aversion to Islam, you're aware of many of them, and many people around the world are living in genuine fear of this ideology. It is not 'irrational' to be critical of this backward belief system and irresponsible not to be.

 

You are in no position to disagree with the oxford dictionary. You're just whining again because I proved you wrong,... mainly because you were too lazy to look it up yourself.

 

It's a new word that did contradict with existing ones, but it's usage entitled it to a new meaning.
If you use dictionaries 10 years old, it is a meaningless word.
Now it's just a dumb one.

But I will concede, anyone who actually uses it, is just making excuses.

 

It makes as much sense as Naziophobia or WhiteManophobia, both of which may wind up in the OED. But you can cling to this propaganda if it suits you in your playing the victim game.