The video at this link reconstructs and matches the earthrise images taken by Apollo astronauts. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo8-retrace.html http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo8-retrace.html NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Brings 'Earthrise' to Everyone 04.18.12 The data in the orbiter MATCHES the placement and images EXACTLY. Now this either proves the moon landings happened, that is people stood on the moon an took these photos, or The entire Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is a scam. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Reconnaissance_Orbiter Since the Lunar Orbiter is far too well documented to be scam, reasonable people must conclude we DID land on the Moon. RIP Moon Landing Hoax
Here's a post I made on another thread about this. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...sees-apollo-landing-sites.html#post1061523933
Whining that the 'pictures are fakable',thereby calling thousands of scientists and technicians liars,is NOT 'making a point'
Just saw this, and thought I would throw more fuel on the fire. Moon flags still standing, but are now white Man, NASA must sure love making busy work for themselves! Constantly faking pictures time and time again with slight changes! It is a good thing Scott is here to inform us that since pictures are fakeable, that the LRO picture must be fake. It must be nice having such confidence in one's own ego to make such proclimations with zero evidence. The rest of us mere mortals have to struggle with evidence before making statements like Scott fires off at the drop of a hat!
I've posted this rebuttal to that argument several times. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4731597&postcount=1087 Some scientists can be bribed or threatened and the rest can be silenced and science journals are controlled. Here's something else. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Moon_Hoax (excerpt) ---------------------------------------------------- Questioning man's way to the Moon is almost an absolute taboo in scientific circles.[4] But in the Internet, the debate[5] between NASA defenders and Moon sceptics goes on, and public support for the latter grows.[6] An official admission of a hoax would likely have the most grave consequences for NASA, the USA, and all people and organisations involved in space exploration worldwide. This would also challenge the future manned Moon and Mars missions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd never heard the theory that the picture of the Earthrise was faked. I've never looked into this but I always just assumed that it wasn't faked because the picture could have been taken by an unmanned craft orbiting the moon. This looks like the classic tactic of misrepresenting the position of the hoax-believers so that you can refute the argument and make them look bad. http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222 (excerpt) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Could you link to something in which a real hoax-believer alleges that the picture of the Earthrise was faked? The anomalies in the video and pictures have already proved that the missions were faked. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4001964&postcount=1 Some fakable pictures don't make those anomalies go away. You have an authoritative patronizing attitude but your actual arguement is pretty lame. Are you saying those pictures weren't fakeable?
Yeah, we've seen your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) excuses before. They've all been debunked. That is why you only post links in hopes nobody actually goes out and sees how bad you got your ass handed to you time and time again. All it proves is you are delusional and no amount of evidence will ever convict someone like you. Any picture is fakeable. Just about everything is fakeable. It is a petty copout to pretend that just because something IS fakeable that it actually IS a fake. Then again, you've never been below such childish tactics before, so I'm not surprised you continue on that same path.
This is so lame that it's hardly worth responding to but I'll respond anyway. If something is fakable, it can't be used as proof because it's plausible that it's fake and you are using it as proof. They'd laugh you out of the debating hall for this argument.
Nonsensical doubletalk,no way related to any form of honest debate,by your reasoning anyone paying with a printed form of money can be refused,because the bill COULD be counterfeit....
EVERYTHING is fakeable to the retarded who wish to use that childish tactic. How do we know you're really you? Someone could be faking being you. Someone could be faking being you and just posting bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims in an attempt to get people riled up. How do we know? If it is fake, you should be able to present evidence it is fake. Oh wait. You've never presented a lick of evidence in your life. You like to believe your retarded opinion is evidence, but the only thing it is evidence of is extreme paranoid delusions and egomania bordering on megalomania. You're going to have to try harder than the pathetic "they're fakeable" argument. BTW, when is your ban from the debating hall for complete lack of evidence going to be lifted?
The Apollo 11 lunar module crew placed the flag too close to their spacecraft and, according to Buzz Aldrin himself, it was blown away as they blasted off to rendezvous with Michael Collins, on board Columbia, their Command and Service Module orbiting the Moon. Man, if they were going to fake that mission, couldn't they have at least kept the flag standing?
And yet they use all kinds of "fakable" evidence to convict people all the time. This argument is ridiculous. You're saying if a cop stops you and asks for your ID he/she shouldn't take that as proof of your identify because ID is fakable. Or no one should take your checks because the could be "fakable". What a bizarre world you must live in.
