Navy expected to relieve captain who raised alarm about COVID-19 outbreak on aircraft carrier

Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by Andrew Jackson, Apr 2, 2020.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. StillBlue

    StillBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    13,171
    Likes Received:
    14,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One irony, the same ones here condemning the ship captain for whistle blowing are the same people that condemned China for arresting their Covid-19 whistle blowing doctor.
     
    FreshAir and Sallyally like this.
  2. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,851
    Likes Received:
    28,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No, China’s different.(snicker)
     
    Alchemist and StillBlue like this.
  3. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,635
    Likes Received:
    63,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    Sallyally likes this.
  4. Crownline

    Crownline Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    “Loose lips sink ships”
    Never heard that phrase before?
     
  5. StillBlue

    StillBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    13,171
    Likes Received:
    14,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure. And do you recall what China was charging the Doctor with?
     
  6. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Navy has got to relieve him of command since he so massively broke the chain of command and several other key restrictions having to do rules and regulations. We can respect the individual for his integrity but still accept that he broke the rules he was legally bound to obey.
     
    Labouroflove likes this.
  7. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,635
    Likes Received:
    63,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    kinda like Trump when he broke the rules... oh wait
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  8. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You meant Obama when he politically weaponized the IRS and then later the FBI?
     
  9. Vernan89188

    Vernan89188 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    8,685
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To what go after his own party? Stick to the topic at hand..gdanm thats a reach.

    Not only that If Obama was in charge this whole thing would been solved like every other outbreak thats happened throughout the world we have weathered...This one ONLY came to a head over here, because of lack of leadership.

    See, we can make up BS too..dont go there.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
  10. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean the sycophant media would have said, "Virus? What virus? It's no more dangerous than any other form of influenza." The nation's MSM fanatically spun and covered for Obama no matter what; and it's the exact same MSM that fanatically attack Trump . . . no . . . matter . . . what. Now you know why intelligent people call the MSM fake news.
     
  11. Vernan89188

    Vernan89188 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    8,685
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they said that..it should still cause you to avoid crowded areas..Influenza is no freaken joke either. Im immune to both..but those who arnt dont need me haphazardly shaking peoples hands hugging them, and sneezing all inside of nursing homes till they find a vaccine do they?
    And I dont think the media covered for him at all..Look at all the crap some media told you to dislike him for.

    The difference was Trump told people to act like you do, Obama would have handled it like he handled it when he had to. But thats nether here nor there. The captain was a good guy..He is relived possibly for breaking chain of command..possibly, but Im more suspect it was because he made Trump look bad, and I also suspect others may have knew crap, but avoided whistle blowing to saves their own butts. Good leadership shouldn't threaten the talent with firings.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    Sallyally likes this.
  12. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This captain is a hero. He trashed his career to save his crew. Good on him.
     
    Vernan89188 and Sallyally like this.
  13. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,197
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He sent it through unclassified channels. The Fleet Admiral would also be have his flag on that ship and his immediate boss.

    As the WSJ notes and I have previously noted

    "Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly said Thursday that he’d relieved Capt. Crozier for showing “extremely poor judgment.” Mr. Modly said the captain sent his letter to 20 or 30 people over an unclassified channel and was operating outside normal procedures in the chain of command. These are serious, fireable offenses, and Capt. Crozier could have offered his resignation instead if he felt he’d exhausted his ability to care properly for his sailors.


    More substantively, adversaries are now aware that a U.S. aircraft carrier is said to be in rough shape in the South Pacific. China and Russia would be delighted to exploit American weakness amid a pandemic. Capt. Crozier’s letter said the U.S. is not at war but that doesn’t mean it isn’t under threat.

    Then again, there are questions. What would motivate a captain with more than 25 years in the Navy to torch his own career? Anyone who reaches such a prestigious position in the Navy tends to be a company man. Mr. Modly says that none of the more than 100 people on the ship who have tested positive have been hospitalized, and that his office had already been working with Capt. Crozier."
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-navy-captain-and-the-coronavirus-11585955473?mod=opinion_lead_pos2
     
  14. BaghdadBob

    BaghdadBob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2016
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And the rest of the story is that SecNav (Acting) Modly said Crozier had cc’ed more than 20 people, including some outside the chain of command, over unsecured and unclassified systems, assuring the memo’s leak.

    He also said Crozier did not speak to his direct superior, carrier strike group commander Rear Adm. Stuart Baker, about his concerns before sending the memo, despite Baker being on the carrier and living within feet of Crozier.

    Modly said Crozier was not fired for expressing concerns, but the way he chose to do so. Bitching is not uncommon in any branch of the military, but if you break the rules expect unfavorable consequences.
     
    Labouroflove and Bluesguy like this.
  15. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The brass had no choice but to relieve him of his command and he had to know that would happen but he did it anyway...because of his devotion to his men

    When he left the ship they cheered him and chanted his name
     
  16. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,789
    Likes Received:
    11,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm pretty sure you have the details wrong.

    Most are saying that Crozier went through the chain noting he had 100 guys testing positive. The chain was unresponsive, and soon thereafter Crozier himself sent his letter to his hometown newspaper who published it.

    Crozier did the right thing trying to keep his crew safe and his boat from being rendered unable to perform because of sick sailors.

    Crozier is the hero in this case, the man with a conscience who did the right thing in so many ways.

    If DJT allows the current situation to stand, his status as a complete moral midget will be solidly confirmed.
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  17. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,197
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And when a commanders "devotion to his men" takes precedent over national security and the mission they get relieved.
     
  18. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,789
    Likes Received:
    11,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Crozier clearly knows right from wrong, but it appears you do not.

    How would national security be effected with that ship at sea with half or more of its crew "unfit for duty" because of a public health issue?
     
  19. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because it was leaked to the public that one of America's premiere war machines was operating at less than peak capacity. That's not something you say out loud.

    Don't get me wrong, this Captain has my upmost respect and obviously has the same from his men seeing the response he received on his way out. This is a failure of the Navy and the DoD and he basically sacrificed himself to protect his men. It doesn't get much more honorable than that. But the Navy should have done a better job of addressing this man's concerns which they obviously did not seeing how he did what he did. The Navy should never put it's leaders in a position to where they have to do something like this in order to protect the safety of their Sailors.

    This isn't just happening in the Navy right now mind you, you are simply hearing about this one because it's on the news. The DoD screwed this whole pandemic up from the top down and A LOT of military leaders were having to give the proverbial middle finger to higher echelons in order to protect the safety of their troops. High Commands have started to get better at taking this pandemic seriously and doing something about it but it was utter chaos a mere week ago. Plenty of high brass were making absolutely asinine decisions in response to this and many subordinate leaders were forced to buck the system.

    It's obviously no secret to anybody that the military is also at risk of the virus. We aren't aliens who are immune to it or anything we are people too. But from a national security standpoint HOW effected we are by the virus is something you want to keep behind closed doors. The military is in a tough balancing act right now regarding personnel safety and national security. We can't just shut down the military like we can Starbucks or something but we also can't just continue operating as if nothing is wrong and risk being unfit to perform any duties if half of us are sick as you said. We need to be able to maintain our global response posture while simultaneously making sure we aren't infecting the whole force. High Commands are concerned with maintaining the former, subordinate Commands are concerned with the latter. And both of those are valid and of equal concern which is why I don't blame anybody. This is just unprecedented territory that nobody in the military has ever had to navigate before and are trying to maintain that balance.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    Eleuthera and Lesh like this.
  20. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yea... screw the men right?

    national security? Are we at War?

    Jesus
     
  21. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are we at war? Actually yes we are still fighting the war on terror. However, no we are not "at war" in the manner you are implying such as WWIII or anything. What you have to understand is that the military does A LOT that the common everyday person doesn't hear about because it's just normal business on a global scale. A few days ago someone posted asking why NORAD was quarantining folks at Cheyenne Mountain as if something was going on that we aren't hearing about. The answer is no, America maintains our global first strike capabilities 24/7 and also maintains our ability to defeat all other world powers in a conventional sense. Society just doesn't hear about these things every day because it's normal operating procedure for the military and the war on terror has overshadowed Americas conventional operations for decades.

    The US Navy is pretty much the backbone of American global military strength. And the backbone of the US Navy are the Carrier Strike Groups. America must always be able to maintain the ability to decisively defeat China, Russia, Iran, N Korea, etc. ALWAYS, including during global times of crisis such as this and during the times where our focus shifts from conventional warfare to counter-terrorism as it has been for 20 years. We still maintain that conventional war posture, you just don't hear about it as often. So what the Navy, and the US military as a whole, is trying to do is figure out how to strike a balance between maintaining our ability to do those aforementioned things will simultaneously not reducing our fighting force by having thousands of service members infected and quarantined.

    And if part of our global response force DOES indeed become compromised it is in our best interest to not let the world know that because America needs to be able to, as well as ensure everyone knows, that we can strike you at any given point regardless of what is currently going on.

    Some parts of the military have indeed been restricted to essential personnel only, the parts that we can afford to do that. But as far as the parts of the military that ensure we can strike any place on Planet Earth at any given moment as well as defend ourselves and our interests....those parts are being deemed essential personnel.

    It's not about "screw the men", it's about understanding the the US military is not the civilian world. The military is one of those few jobs out there to where when it comes down to it there IS an acceptable loss criteria for accomplishing a mission. That acceptable loss criteria includes training, enemy fire, OR viruses. It sounds morbid but that's reality. The US military sends troops to training sites around the country every month and at these training sites somebody WILL die, not "might", will. That is an acceptable loss to the US military in order to create the most realistic training scenarios they can. If all hell breaks loose and the WWIII alarm bells start ringing I will be called into a briefing room and told to go. And during that briefing Commanders will put up intel reports and stats and say something like "Causalities will be 33%", which translates to "1 out of every 3 of you will be wounded or killed". And that same Commander will say "Launch the fleet" which translates to "1 out of 3 of you will die, that is an acceptable loss for me as your Commander to accomplish this mission. Go". And I will go. (I've sat in briefings like that before, they aren't fun, luckily we stood down).

    Point is, the "mission" isn't reserved to just open declarations of war. It's not just things like take this objective or take the hill. The mission overall is American first, second, and third strike capability all around the world. That mission is always going on and the criteria for that mission is the same as any other mission. Will military Commanders risk the health of service members to accomplish a mission? Yes they will. They will of course do everything they can to protect the service members but there does come a point to where protecting the troops compromises the actual mission then the mission will come first.

    That's the reality, we aren't the civilian world, we are the military. The Navy Captain isn't "wrong" and the Navy itself isn't "wrong". And neither of them are exactly "right" either. It's just the way it is.
     
  22. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sorry, the guy was an idiot and deserved to get sacked.

    The key things people are missing is the timeline. By the time the Captain started making an ass of himself, the ship had already been in port for 4 days, and the Navy and officials at Naval Base Guam were working as hard as they could to take everybody off. But the problem was, where do they put everybody?

    It's not like there are tons of empty barracks sitting around on a Navy base. The last time Guam had the kind of excess barracks for handling large numbers of sailors was before 1997 when they closed the nearby Ship Repair Facility. Since then, like all bases in the military they had enough barracks for their own people, and that is about all. Certainly not enough to double the size of the base.

    They had to arrange some kind of housing for them, a way to feed them, a way to get them all screened for the virus, and set up isolation facilities and everything from laundry to medical clinics. And at the same time keeping their own personnel safe so this would not spread even more.

    Yes, it could have been done much faster. If the Navy wanted to simply take everybody off of the ships and put them up in tents, gyms, and anyplace else they had room to house them in. And in perfect conditions to spread this disease even faster.

    This is what amazes me in this discussion. People are so busy pointing fingers, none of them are asking the simple question of "What should the Navy have done instead?" You had a Captain screaming things were not done fast enough, and I am sure the officials at the Guam Navy Base were working as hard and fast as they could to come up with solutions. And instead of being grateful that this entire base was working their butts off to do all they could, this moron jumps up and down and screams that things are not going fast enough.

    I defy anybody to tell me what US military base anywhere in the world other than the home port of a Carrier has the kind of excess barracks sitting around to house over 5,000 people on short notice. Or hell, to even house that many with 2-6 months warning. That is a small base, and the complement of the Teddy R. is about the same as the entire base complement. A decade ago when they moved the 1st Armored Division from Germany back to the US, it took 10 years and over $5 billion dollars to build enough barracks and other facilities to house them all.

    Evacuating an entire ship and finding them a bed and roof is not an easy thing to do, especially if it is a Nimitz class carrier with over 5,000 people on board. And that is even at the best of times, without the worry of a pandemic. And trying to maintain quarantine so that none on the shore are infected.
     
    Bluesguy likes this.
  23. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,551
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    OK, how about this. We take all of the Sailors off as fast as possible.

    Where do they sleep? This is not San Diego, they have no barracks to stay in there. So what do we do? Throw down cots in the gyms, offices, and everywhere else they can stuff them? Pull out the stocks of tents they have and put them in tents all over the place? Without showers and proper sanitation?

    I have been involved in the planning of relocating Battalions, and that is less than 1/5 the size of the crew of this ship. And it takes weeks of preparation to line everything up, from feeding them and portable toilets to shower facilities and aid stations. And that is doing it in tents, a guaranteed way in this instance to make sure that a huge number become infected.

    Yes, the military does have plans and procedures in place for emergency sheltering of people, both military and civilian. But that is for a natural disaster, not a pandemic. The normal procedures are then the worst possible thing you can do, so they all have to be scrapped and new ones made.

    Of course, this was also the kind of thing many of us talked about in the 1990's when they went through the military with a chainsaw, closing bases left and right and ordering the destruction of things that were seen as being "excess". Facilities like the Guam Naval Repair Facility. Which was designed to repair ships, with the entire complement housed in barracks. But that was closed 23 years ago, and all the barracks destroyed. There was simply no need on Guam to ever have that kind of standby housing. And I can guarantee that if the Navy had decided to do it people would have screamed it was a waste of money, and the "MIC getting rich off the taxpayers".
     
    Bluesguy likes this.
  24. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    20,296
    Likes Received:
    7,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I meant taking a carrier out of sction is not something to broadcast to our enemies. The cap"n screwed up.So he lost his command.
     
  25. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cruise ships.

    Perfect example. How many people died on the Diamond Princess? Zero.

    Those that ultimately passed away were evacuated to a hospital on shore. 70 in total evacuated, the remaining 3,700 stayed aboard for two weeks.

    Of the total aboard the Diamond Princess, 3,800 +/-, only 700 became infected with the vast majority asymptomatic or with mild cases.

    Cruise ship passenger manifests skew older. I doubt any of the guests aboard could have passed the physical for naval sea duty or met the age requirement.

    Half?

    Come on, be honest with the numbers.

    20 and 30 year olds without comorbidities are little effected.
    Using numbers representative of entire populations, 40+% of those infected would be asymptomatic, 40+% more would have mild symptoms. If we adjust for age and health, this group would show little negative affect. A few might become severe. Evacuate them or treat them onboard.

    This Ship has an 80+ bed hospital ward. Has at least 5 MDs, a few surgeons, hundreds of corpsmen / RNs. Operating room, ICU etc.

    How exactly, mid cruise, did the crew become infected? Port call? In Asia? Really?
     

Share This Page