Nazis really are the biggest losers in history.

Discussion in 'History & Past Politicians' started by gandrews, Aug 29, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry Rus, this bit bolded has been lost in translation, could you explain again please?
     
  2. Flare

    Flare Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ^ Meh, I don't like how the piece is written.. probably from some kind of "anti-Nazi" author... of which there are many of course.

    I think there were 3 crucial points which made Germany lose the war.

    1. Hitler showing restraint at Dunkirk and letting the 300.000 soldiers go as a good gesture, in the hopes to get the UK back to peace negotiations. However, war-criminal Churchill wouldn't have any of it and kept bombing German cities with civilians only in the meantime... only to have the same soldiers who were granted their lives by Hitler to return on the beaches of Normandy 4 years later. Just the lowest of the low trick to pull off. Imagine you're in the fight of your life... you win and in stead off finishing off the enemy you walk away... only for him to stand up, pull a knife and stab you in the back. That's what happened there. Hitler was too nice of a man. On the other hand, I can understand his problems with finishing off 300.000 defenseless soldiers bunched up on a beach. Besides, he actually liked the British people as he thought they are much alike the Germans and rather would have had them as allies against the communists. But with the full-blown Masonic psychopath Churchill leading them, that was a no-go.

    2. Mussolini messing up in Greece which delayed operation Barbarossa by 6 weeks, as German divisions had to come to the rescue.
    So later, when they were only 15 km from Moscow, winter set in early which cost them the war. Would they have been able to launch Barbarossa weeks earlier, we would now have been living in a normal world. A world without communism, no privately owned (central) banks who enslave us all through debt, no wars, no degeneracy in the media, religion restored etc. etc.

    3. Poor decision at Stalingrad to enter the city and get surrounded. The German army wasn't made for urban combat as well, so they lost all their advantages upon entering the city. And once surrounded, request for early break-out was refused. Once the elite 6th Army was taken out, it was game-over.
     
  3. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean like the Nazis were doing by starting WW2, they got beat in WW1 and then being the lowest of the low required another kicking 21 years later!
     
  4. Flare

    Flare Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Like I said: Hitler was too nice of a man who played too much by the rules.

    He could have finished the British off at Dunkirk but let them go. Only for them to return 4 years later in Normandy, when Germany was mostly weakened due to their massive fight against the Soviets. (who were financially and militarily supported by the US btw; wouldn't that have been the case, Germany would have won)

    Besides that, it wasn't Hitler raining hell on English cities like Churchill did to Germany. A few bombings on England were only out of retalliation (as it were the English who started that), but were nothing the likes the British commited, as they used incendiaries to create huge fire vortexes causing hurricane force winds throughout the cities.

    And the British were also massively financially and materially supported by the US before they even engaged in the war themselves. The British barely could stand on their own feet.

    Churchill was a wicked figure... just compare the following 2 pictures:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Churchill even looks like a pig. And imagine that guy standing bare naked in front of his guests talking to them...

    You think Hitler would have done that? Absolutely not.
    That's because he was of the higher moral standards.
     
  5. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again you fail to address the point about Germany being allowed to come back after their defeat in WW1 and go off on your homoerotic imaginings of Churchill naked. Interesting comparison the pictures of Hitler, considering he never made it to old age like Churchill did.

    Here is a video for you to enjoy of the frail, desperate loser just before he shot his own brains out!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0w3nsAaOpq4
     
  6. orangeaid

    orangeaid New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Churchill was a homosexual pedophile (the Harrow letters) and a Jew under the Halach.

    Those traits often go hand in hand - just look at the Velvet Mafia that controls Hollywood
     
  7. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe, but he was a winning homosexual pedophile Jew, who did not have to spend his last days as a failed loser, in a bunker, shooting his misses and himself!
     
  8. orangeaid

    orangeaid New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Adolf Hitler did not die in his bunker.

    Both Soviet examinations of Hitler's alleged body found it be that of a woman

    - - - Updated - - -

    Adolf Hitler did not die in his bunker.

    Both Soviet examinations of Hitler's alleged body found it be that of a woman
     
  9. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well I have never heard that he was actually a she, but there you are!
     
  10. RUS

    RUS Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    French would help, because they were close to Germany, but .. intervened active Chamberlain (due to the English Channel).

    [​IMG]
    Perhaps the French would help, because they were close to Germany, but ..

    Chamberlain came out of the Strait of the English Channel.Britain had a good defense against Hitler. He could not be afraid of Hitler, as the French had afraid of Hitler.
    Chamberlain actively intervened in the case.
     
  11. orangeaid

    orangeaid New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Um .... he didn't die there.

    Then there is the other quite plausible scenario that his body double died in the bunker

     
  12. RiaRaeb

    RiaRaeb Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    10,698
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe Churchill and Stalin kept him as their own personal gimp, have you thought of that?
     
  13. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    WOW! what an absolute pile of crap.

    It appears as those an examination by a team of forensic archaeologists working WITH PERMISSION from the authorities for the investigation to conduct GPR, Lidar, and physical excavation investigation over a period of weeks, is to be trumped by this idiotic video.

    I particularly liked the clown reading from notes, stating that the bodies were buried after gassing, then gesturing to an empty field as if to say "no graves". Are all deniers so stupid as to actually think that there was a cemetery repleat with headstones? Idiots explaining to idiots.


    Of course, so were the other few thousand nazis that confessed or testified. Yep, even when one hears about the atrocities from the perps own mouths, its not real, its all a hoax. OTOH, I realize that with hate and faith, facts do not matter they just bounce of the sloped foreheads of true believers.

    Perhaps you can tell us all how Eichmann was tortured into his courtroom confessions - he seems quite matter of fact and indeed proud of his "work". Its all on video.

    So? You think that in the millions of stories about the holocaust that there wouldn't be differing experiences? that some traumatized people might not get the details correct or imagine events?


    Seems you have the denialst SOP down pat considering in two posts you have demonstrated:
    Pathetic ignorant nonsense fueled by hatred catering to the stupid.
     
  14. Lee S

    Lee S Moderator Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10,636
    Likes Received:
    2,603
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THREAD CLOSED - Rule 5 - Off Topic

    This thread is closed because of chronic and persistent off-topic remarks concerning the Holocaust.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page