New Evidence in George Floyd's Death?

ALWAYS peaceful methods? What about this piece of human waste BLM organiser in Chicago totally supporting looting? I'll be STUNNED if you reply!

 

How could I? "ALWAYS peaceful methods" is your statement... not mine. You make the claim, you respond to it. I don't even know what it means.

 

You said that "the way they have so far sought to achieve their goals is through peaceful methods." Well that's just simply not true, and I supported my claim that it's not true with that video of that piece of human waste BLM organiser in Chicago totally supporting looting! You're falling apart!

 

The video shows an idiot. Not BLM's position. I never said that BLM was a chemically pure organization where every single protester undergoes a cerebral scan that screens out idiots. In short: the phrase you attributed to me in the previous post is yours.... not mine. Stop attributing your nonsense to me!

In any case, as I stated, the question of whether or not BLM seeks to achieve their goals peacefully is nonsense. Of course they do! But that's not the relevant question. The question is if their demands are justified or not. If they are and they are not redressed, BLM's efforts to keep protests non-violent will be for naught.

 

Yes, I agree that she's an idiot and that it's not BLM's position. And BECAUSE it's not BLM's position, that's EXACTLY why they should come out and condemn the rioting, looting and violence from the HIGHEST level in the organisation. Do you not agree?

I agree, but they seem to be perfectly okay that rioting, looting and violence is happening in their name given that they've not condemned it from the HIGHEST level in the organisation. Even your local examples I have debukned. I think that ONE of your examples was legit, but that was from years ago. Nothing post-Floyd. Not PROPER condemnation at least. In one of your examples, all they said was that the violence has nothing to do with them! That's HARDLY condemnation!

What are their demands as you see them?

Whatever "efforts" BLM has employed to "keep protests non-violent" has FAILED miserably, but I don't think that it's reasonable to expect that there's anything they CAN do about it. What are these "efforts" that you're talking about which you think are working so well to keep protests non-violent?

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...re-violent-or-not-is-not-the-question.577643/