New Report Just Dropped A Bomb On Key Climate Change Data

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Professor Peabody, Jul 11, 2017.

  1. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "three key global temperature data sets used in recent climate change models have been "adjusted" in such a way as to not be "a valid representation of reality."

    Say it isn't so! The study was the all important to the warmies "peer reviewed". The article goes on to quote meteorologist Joe D'Aleo as saying "Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments. Each data-set pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming". Surprise..surprise! They call us science deniers....no, more like "Junk Science" deniers, science like flat earth theory that should be denied.
     
  2. nra37922

    nra37922 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    13,118
    Likes Received:
    8,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  3. J.Idallian

    J.Idallian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Well at least the data is now showing what everyone has known to be true for a while. Lobbyists and politicians gerrymandering samples to fit a narrative. Gosh... who ever would have thought such a thing would happen!?

    ....

    Oh right, literally everyone with the processing power of a Commodore 64.
     
  4. HereWeGoAgain

    HereWeGoAgain Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2016
    Messages:
    27,942
    Likes Received:
    19,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It isn't so. This so-called peer-reviewed study is self published. So it is just a few guys who say so. Nothing more.

    That they self-published instead of waiting for publication in a major journal shows that they had no confidence in their work.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2017
    Wag The Dog, Derideo_Te and Bowerbird like this.
  5. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wehrwolfen, Ddyad and goofball like this.
  6. HereWeGoAgain

    HereWeGoAgain Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2016
    Messages:
    27,942
    Likes Received:
    19,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it wasn't published in a respectable journal. It is nothing.

    You don't understand the basics of how science works.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2017
    Wag The Dog, BoxKicker, Guno and 2 others like this.
  7. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's been "peer reviewed", that means it's true.
     
  8. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Respectable to whom? You?
     
    Wehrwolfen, TrackerSam and Ddyad like this.
  9. J.Idallian

    J.Idallian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Whoever supports the GW agenda.

    Duh.
     
    Ddyad and goofball like this.
  10. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    publishing is not science.
     
  11. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    76,435
    Likes Received:
    51,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly, more fudge than heat!

    Ban AC for DC: If our rulers think global warming is a crisis, let them be a good example for the rest of us..

    This makes sense to me. We’re constantly told by the administration that “climate change” is a bigger threat than terrorism. And as even President Obama has noted, there’s a great power in setting an example: “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.”

    Likewise, it’s hard to expect Americans to accept changes to their own lifestyles when the very people who are telling them that it’s a crisis aren’t acting like it’s a crisis. So I have a few suggestions to help bring home the importance of reduced carbon footprints at home and abroad.

    Read it all.
     
  12. goofball

    goofball Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    5,602
    Likes Received:
    4,267
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gee. You mean the Cult's journals have black balled this PEER REVIEWED STUDY?

    I'm shocked! Shocked i tells ya!
     
  13. goofball

    goofball Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    5,602
    Likes Received:
    4,267
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only when Cult approved results are found.
     
    TrackerSam and Professor Peabody like this.
  14. goofball

    goofball Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    5,602
    Likes Received:
    4,267
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Respectable = Cult approved.
     
  15. RichT2705

    RichT2705 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    28,887
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    The big wealth distribution fraud continues.

    You know it's a big fraud when the danger is so dire that China is able to continue increasing it's emissions and may peak somewhere between 2030 and 2040 LOL.
    When you see that, the rational conclusion to draw is that there isn't really a problem.
    Don't care what graphs get paraded to us or statements by Scientists in line with the agenda try to say, proof is in the actions...or inactions in this case.
     
  16. vanityofvanitys

    vanityofvanitys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But President Obama told us climate change is the greatest threat to our national security ---- more than terrorism I presume?
    He also told Leonardo diCaprio it was a significant contributor as a cause of the Syrian civil war. Here I thought it was "Arab spring" uprising again?

    And famed climatologist professor Judith Curry resigned her tenured post at Georgia Tech because she could no longer stomach the manipulations of data or the withholding of data. But I keep forgetting, science is only interested in the unbiased truth or facts.
    http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/01...-my-tenured-faculty-position-at-georgia-tech/
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2017
  17. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,877
    Likes Received:
    73,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That list of authors reads like a who,s who of big oil paid shills

    Now where did they actually get that study published?
     
  18. vanityofvanitys

    vanityofvanitys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Playing the last trump card in your hand to keep the ruse going?
     
  19. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,877
    Likes Received:
    73,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Interestingly they named the peer reviewers. This is rare. Usually papers are sent out to a list from the journal they submitted it to

    Peer review is not gettin a couple of mates to read something
    This so called paper is supposed to have found what the Berkeley Earth project could not find

    Yeah suuuure!
     
  20. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Canned answer, refute the findings....if you can.
     
    Wehrwolfen and Ddyad like this.
  21. Denizen

    Denizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    10,424
    Likes Received:
    5,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Daily Wire is a false news site perpetrated and financed by radical conservatives.
     
    Derideo_Te, toddwv and Bowerbird like this.
  22. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Generally the peers have to be qualified. Anybody can give it to a buddy look it over and publish their garbage on the internet.

    The same people who take these clowns seriously are the ones who deny the science behind evolution.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  23. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So Todd, what peers weren't qualified? By all means post who they are and why they aren't qualified?
     
    Bear513 and drluggit like this.
  24. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,413
    Likes Received:
    15,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This guy Joe D'Aleo, gets paid by the Heartland Instititue (Aka Exxon/Mobil).
     
    Derideo_Te and Bowerbird like this.
  25. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,877
    Likes Received:
    73,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Let. Us look at these so called peer reviewers

    Alan carlin. Economist known denialist
    Harold Doiron mechanical engineer. Known denialist
    Theodore r Eck. Economist for Standard Oil. Yes ladies and gentlemen this one actually works for the enemy
    Need I go on?
     
    Derideo_Te and toddwv like this.

Share This Page