NIST has no evidence, the official "Story" is DEAD

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Apr 7, 2013.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Here are the damning pics showing erosion that would have taken 500 years in salt water to accomplish.

    Here is terrorist and criminal Gross the nist guy who lied about the yellow white molten stuff around and under the wtc standing on one of the disintegrated columns showing it off and rubbing it in that they got away with it.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]



    these trougher people want us to believe in ghosts and goblins

    that planes fly through buildings OMG

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    in 3d no less and no deceleration delay


    They do not know the difference between tv magic and real life!

    [​IMG]



    That jumpers can fly out of buildings at 70 miles per hour

    [​IMG]

    they say that not a person that its just some garbage flying out the window.


    then when you tell these characters to give you the data set for wtc 7 model and they give you a link implying that building 7 data set is there all the while shaking in their panties hoping that you do not look

    NOPE NO BUILDING 7 DATA HERE http://razor.occams.info/nist-wtc/

    watch the whole corner cave in and the kink in the wrong place! Of course on the ball debunkers and nist think thats just a minor oversight not to be concerned with.

    [​IMG]

    Because they have nothing! No data for wtc 7 just more smoke and mirrors because NIST made all that (*)(*)(*)(*) up!

    sorry nist thats not the way it looked in REALITY! LMFAO

    [​IMG]

    yet these troughers simply hang onto any straw they can and take you down any wabbit hole they can.

    The official "story" appropriately named is dead! All they did was guess and they didnt even get that right.



    Tell me; Who in a sane state of mind can believe these trougher guys anyway?


    This proves once and for all the official story is nothing more than a hollywood official lie and its DEAD DEAD DEAD!


    .
     
  2. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What should it have looked like?
     
  3. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sorry there does not appear to be any data associated with your post
     
  4. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Precisely my point, in re the entire movement.
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you need to get used to it, that the official governments propaganda movement is dead, physics and the real world destroys all this hollywood bull(*)(*)(*)(*) your disinformation movement trying to stuff down everyones throats

    [​IMG]

    there model is so wrong you do not even need to graduate grade school to figure it out and see it for the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that it is.

    Your propaganda movement is history and who drove the final nail in the coffin?

    your pals at NIST!
     
  6. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then please give us a description of what the collapse should have looked like if the NIST is wrong
     
  7. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Personal insults aside. Why are you so reluctant to show how the fall should have looked if the NIST scenario is followed
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Please reread it because I corrected it to insure that no one could construe it to be a personal insult.

    It was intended to be purely educational.



    The fall should have looked like this

    [​IMG]


    See the bolded parts.

    The NIST "scenario" should and does look exactly like their fantasy:

    [​IMG]

    Its their fantasy, what can I say! LOL

    What do you think their fantasy should have looked like?


    I hear the roads are getting icy and its tough getting traction so you all be careful.
     
  9. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still does not answer they question. We know how the building fell. You say the NIST does not describe the collapse. So what should the collapse have looked like following the NIST findings?
     
  10. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The only vestige of the 9/11 fiction movement is populated with people who are insecure and self absorbed. For them, it's not about truth, or science, or the live broadcasts which prove no planes. Its about them. It's about their fears. It's about their shortcomings. It's about their failures.

    The idea of a 19 hijackers successfully duping the most powerful nation in the world (EVEN THOUGH MANY WERE ACTUALLY FOUND ALIVE AND NOT INVOLVED IN 911) is patently absurd and was never proven by anyone in the government, mass media or anyone online. They can't make sense out of something that simply never happened. It's a way for them to assuage their fear of facts they cannot refute. It's a way for them to come to terms with the fact that they are not in control; at least their stupid belief in government garbage is accepted by most americans.

    If you notice, the official conspiracy itself isn't all that important. They don't bother to actually support a single narrative. It's their delusional demand that the official faked story provided by a complicit mass media is true because they desperately want it to be, even though obvious evidence of assinine video fakery aired on live tv and many amateur shots that showed up later. And so they'll say and do any nonsensical thing they can think of to try and convince themselves that the thing they understand is true simply cannot be. NO BOEING WAS CAPTURED BY ANY CAMERA ON 911 CLOSE TO ANY BUILDING WHEN IT EXPLODED.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    apparently english is not your native language and you are using some kind of translator.

    Do you need this stated in some other language for you to understand what is being said here?

    I am growing tired of this and wont play much longer because it looks like you want me to create a strawman for you and I refuse to do that.
     
  12. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am not asking you to create anything. You say the NIST results do not reflect what was seen in the real world. To do that you need to demonstrate what the NIST data shows the collapse should have looked like, then compare the two. You seem to be really wanting to avoid this point for some reason
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    the nist data
    looks like this

    v v v v v v v v v v
    [​IMG]
    the nist data should have looked like this ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

    If this is not clear enough to you I am very sorry but we have a failure to communicate and it aint me pal, so ask one of the troughers out here to help you understand it.
     
  14. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,055
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So starting with insults to anyone who questions your fantasy.

    This is a completely untrue statement. But if you have evidence please show it.

    Actually what do you mean by proof?

    Are you saying 9-11 didn't happen?

    The truthers are the ones who can't handle not having control. That is why they ignore reality for their special knowledge.

    Nothing any truther has ever presented, posted, or suggested has had any proof what-s0-ever.


    Really? I don't even know how anyone can say this.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Huh?

    You do not seem to understand.

    My point is and remains,

    This is reality:
    It is provided to you by Truthers!

    [​IMG]




    This is a fantasy!
    It is provided to you by Troughers!


    [​IMG]




    The secret how you can tell is that the fantasy does not match the reality.
     
  16. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey cuckooforcocoapuffs . . . Do you realize that the NIST model is showing a collapse starting on the side of the building ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING?When the side facing the camera starts to collapse, it looks EXACTLY like the actual collapse.Thanks for showing everyone how NIST got it exactly right!!
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    so where is it? LMAO
     
  18. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look at your illustration of the NIST model where the wall facing the camera starts to collapse. It looks exactly like the video footage of the collapse.
     
  19. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I see 7forever still can't understand what happens to images when you zoom in on a low res image at a ridiculously high level.

    I wonder if he even believes half of the crap that he posts. :frown:
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83

    yeh I sort of figured you would back off that wrong side point.

    they do look the same before the collapse dont they.

    At least NIST got that part right huh.


    [​IMG]
     
  21. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you talking about? I have backed off of nothing. I don't know what was going on with the editor when I made my previous post but I stand by it. The NIST model shows the wall on the side of the building away from the camera collapsing first. Or more specifically the wall and columns that can't be seen from the outside on the area that the camera is facing.

    They look the same when the wall facing the camera starts to collapse as well. I'm glad you finally admit that NIST got it right. That's a step in the right direction for you.

    I'm sure that was careless editing on your part. I can't imagine you would purposely post any animated gifs that corroborate the NIST version.
     
  22. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dishonest posting on your part. You have deliberately put them out of synch so that the two images do not look the same at any time. :roflol:

    FAIL.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    nope they look the same until the demolition sequence starts. LOL

    So you deny that the left corner (including the wall facing the camera) caves in on the model before the right corner starts to move down. huh
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83

    huh?

    are you ok man?

    syncing has nothing to do with it! LMAO

    With all that experience you claim to have whats going in there?

    They are side by side was only for everyones viewing convenience.

    You should have known that.

    and as you can see nists model is not the same speed as the real building.
     
  25. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nobody with an IQ above 50 denies that the left side fell first.

    Want to tell me why it makes your case?

    It doesn't, really. It supports our argument that the sheel of the building was hollowed out in the initial stages, so that free-fall means approximately SQUAT.
     

Share This Page