The irony of this post is immeasurable. During my short time here, I have posted an absolute over-abundance of facts, documents, images, reconstructions, reports, and more, from radar, flight plans, to transcripts and audio records, to back up every single point I make. The only response to which from you, was hand waving. And now you lecture me on posting 'fluff' and claim you're "finding the facts". The ridiculousness of your post is lost on you entirely. What a truly deluded individual.
~sigh pick out your top fact, just one, explain what makes you think its an incontrovertible fact and lets take a look at it and see if you have anything more than the sieves you posted before.
Do I really have to go bump the radar thread? Or my Pentagon thread? Or my thermite thread? Why would I bother? I've posted Radar. I've posted verified documents. I've posted ATC recordings and transcripts. I've posted verified images. I've posted verified video. I've posted witness testimonies. I've posted everything from secrete service logs, to flight manifests, to personal conversations I've had with people involved on that day. I've posted all this, just to have you hand wave it away. Why would I bother doing that all over again?
oh well if you are regurgitating what I already dismissed as frivolous then you are right there is no point because its controvertible.
The problem is that you do not present actual verifiable facts to contradict his statements. That is to say, you don't trouble yourself with finding actual EVIDENCE. Bring some or look a fool.
Hey kids I am not the one here trying to prove the governments conspiracy theory YOU ARE. I do not need to put up squat until you present verifiable incontrovertible facts and all ANY of you have presented so far is belches and beer farts in facts clothing. Until the time you do which will never happen what can I say....SPIN! LOL Shortage on whitewash! Hear the stock is going up!
yeh it takes a man to argue bull(*)(*)(*)(*)! Cowards argue facts! Troughers get so pissy when Truthers want to argue facts? ~House of Cards Even Kindergarteners spot the difference right away whats wrong with the troughers? ~Whitewash .
Ironic that I read this just now LoL. I just placed Koko on ignore after he told me that he wouldn't be able to hire me. It'll be a nice break.
I love it when people put me iggy squiggy! See you cant even get something as simple as my saying that I WOULD NOT hire you because you cant get anything right and you managed to convert that into I would not BE ABLE to hire you. For (*)(*)(*)(*) sake I have to want to hire you first. The only think I would hire you guys for is if I needed a propaganda team but even then I would not hire because you are not even qualified to do that successfully. Then I suppose you wonder why people do not take you seriously. Get something right, anything, and that impression may change.
you wonder why no one believes anything troughers say any more? the nist model the roof kink is in the wrong place and the corner caves before the roofline even starts to move. Completely different failure mechanism than from reality. that and the corner on the real building does not cave till its only a couple lousy floors from the ground.
The whole thing is collapsing inward on itself. How about providing some actual data on the position of ther camera. The roof appears to deform almost as soon as it is set into motion.
that is the last half of the demolition. it does not show the beginning. yes we all know that it collapsed in its own footprint. nist cannot reproduce the actual collapse, but thats the way computers are, garbage in garbage out.
The computer can only work from what can be known. Much cannot be known because nobody was there to take measurements of the damage done by the most horredous bombardment that a skyscraper ever took. CD would have been knowable.
no it wouldnt. not without an investigation. wait you mean they investigated for cd and lied to us that they didnt? Bombers dropped bombs on it now? (*)(*)(*)(*) this is getting more weird by the second. Oh well if they could not measure it then they simply made (*)(*)(*)(*) up got it! L)OL
They would have known which columns and girders would have to be taken out, in what order, in a CD. The damage, pre-collapse, was more random. The impact of debris from the north tower was the equivalent of a heavy artillery barrage. The showed the results of failure of the identified column in a logical mathematical progression AS THE TOWERS WERE BUILT. Can you follow this?
more random? another belch and fart contest? Then again you are correct that they have to be taken out in sequence if you want the building to fall straight down. there was no structural damage to 7 from debris. yeh their collapse looked NOTHING LIKE THE REAL ONE get it? Well unless you want to claim that the purpose for making the model was to make it look as different as possible from reality. then they did a great job! I would have done a better job though I would have simply made it fall sideways and claimed that was the collapse sequence.
You are apparently too busy rehersing your bukkake scene to pay attention. Well, they had to fail in a particular sequence to fall hap-hazzardly in the foot print and onto neighboring structures and across the street, but that sequence is unknowable, because nobody was able to get in there and determine what structural damage had been done before the fires or how badly the heat had warpped any given piece of steel as the fires progressed. Per statements made by fire fighters at the scene, and per Barry Jennings, and per Michael Hess, you are quite laughably wrong. We can see some of the damage in news footage. You are totally pulling stuff out of the wrong end of your torso now. Actually, it did. You are suffering debilitating confirmation bias here. You are actually trying to do just that here.
Seeing as Fraud only exists to me in quoted form, it seems he has not yet realised that he has been on my ignore list for well over a month now.
