NIST has no evidence, the official "Story" is DEAD

Kind of like this thread.

 

"garbage in garbage out".

thats ok just dont let the door hit you in the ass on your way back out.

 

so you admit that;
nobody was able to get in there and determine what structural damage had been done

and at the same time want everyone to believe the model is good for anything more than wiping our asses?

 

They were able to determine by examining the metal what did cause failure of key elements. They were also able to determine, by cursory examination of the steel that it was NOT done by explosive charges.

 

the steel? what "the steel"? every piece of steel?

they said they did not investigate the possibilities of explosives.

what "the metal"? I did not see pics of the metal that they made these grandiose assumptions.

Oh wait that would jeaopardize national security and its top secret like the rest of their data. I forgot.

which of courwse brings us right back to total guess work and pulling data out of their asses.

 

They did not forensically test for explosives because there were no visual signs of explosive damage to the steel

 

according to nist nothing was molten either, yet we have (*)(*)(*)(*) loads of pics showing lots of molten.

so you simply accept their lies then

 

No the NIST found no STEEL had melted prior to the collapse

 

Good luck trying to get by the artful dodger koko.

He just can't grasp the notion that the workers doing the cleanup weren't sleepwalking their way through the cleanup, and they had to keep their eyes open,because the rubble pile was one big crime scene

 

so they found it melted after the collapse then huh

 

Oh I know - some things never change And even if the clean up crew missed something there was forensic guys at the dump site checking everything in the hope of finding closure for as many of the families as possible. Koko does not seem to realize that there is a fair bit of steel from both towers in a storage area, that if anyone was really serious about concerns could go and re-examine.

- - - Updated - - -

Feel free to show me an image of molten steel from the site

 

I and others have posted them several times, and I did not say molten steel, you did, I said molten stuff. does not matter what the (*)(*)(*)(*) was that was glowing near 3000 degrees the (*)(*)(*)(*) was hot enough to melt or weaken anything near it.



Like that.

 

Safe bet he'll dodge that request.

 

Ahh well that is even easier. Did you miss the section of the NIST report that discussed apparent metallic outflow from level 80 of the south tower.

And that photo you supplied has clearly been cut with a welders torch because there is no evidence of slag at all

 

Show me the molten steel.

 

so they cut pretty designs in the steel did they? Is that what you think?



clearly torched too right! LMAO

- - - Updated - - -

find it yourself.

 

I said "molten." That stuff is chemically corroded. I would guess from exposure to sulphuric acid in the presence of copper

 

Your claim, your evidence. No one other than you is obligated to present evidence to defend your point. Thats not how debates work

 

What are you assuming that you have here?

- - - Updated - - -

I have no reason to believe it exists, thus would not have any idea where to find it. I could as well google "unicorn poo."

 

it looks like a dog bone to me what do you assume I have there?

- - - Updated - - -

I did not claim molten steel you did so you put it up.

 

I did in post 93 which I notice you chose to ignore

 

nope you did not say molten steel in post 93.

 

What did I say?

 

go read it

 

I wrote it - you ignored it. Now you are back peddling gleefully