No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

mmmmmmmmmmmmm....so?.....the link has the testimony/statements from the those who witnessed Flight 11, as well as, Flight 175.

AS ALWAYS, YOU FAIL

 

He didn't see a plane. He was right when he stood there and told the truth.

No one could have seen a plane because Clifton Cloud didn't. He saw the ball and was only a mile away. This witness is confirmed by 3 live videos that filmed an object.

"I just caught the second explosion on videotape...No, a bomb, I saw it, NO PLANE HIT NOTHIN', the building exploded from the other tower floors down."

NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 1-3 (WTC2 Plane Impact, 9:03am) - YouTube

 

I"ve heard that it wasn't a plane at all; it was a small tactical nuclear weapson fired from a helicopter.

 

That's funny...Clifton Cloud, as pointed out to you much earlier in the thread, never claimed he saw a plane 7 years later in a heavily altered audio clip. He assured us there was a plane even though he saw the ball and mistook it for a chopper. Furthermore, because many witnesses didn't see a plane proves those who said they did, were lying.

Honesty and logic, you're not doing them correctly.

 

Interview with Clifton Cloud:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=X09R95S3Jck


YOU'RE WRONG

 

He was right AND TOLD THE TRUTH when it happened. YOU LOSE EVERY TIME TO REALITY.

"There was a police copter like near it...(I swear), I don't know what happen to him," This was Clifton's way of questioning whether he really saw a chopper.


"Ya, the second one I'm tellin' ya..was...I didn't see a plane...I was watching it...I didn't see a plane.

All I saw was a helicopter and I didn't see the helicopter anymore. It just looked like it exploded from the inside."

"Ya, but I don't think it was a plane. No, because it happened like 20 minutes later. I think it was a bomb on the second building. I think they had that bomb in there and they were like alright let's maximize it. Hit it with a plane, and then hit the bomb."

"There was a police copter like near it...I swear, I don't know what happen to him, but. But when the second one exploded there was a helicopter not too far away."

"Ya, I tell you man, I saw it in slow motion, that second building just went boom, just exploded from the inside out, just like a movie, like a cheap movie which was really weird...it was like a 1970's Charleton Heston movie."

"It was unbelievable, I mean it exploded from the inside, that second one."

NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 7-9 - YouTube



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNLVxWUbPDU

 

Clifton Cloud says you're wrong, just admit it. You lose


Are all of these fake also?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=814rcm4KC5w&feature=related

 

Clifton Cloud proves he's lied in 08, just admit it. You lose.

 

Oh, so now he's lying? prove it.

I think what is more than clear to everyone who visits these threads is, you're a simple run-of-the-mill-conspiracy believer. You lack the intellectuall honesty to look into your own claims to learn they just don't hold any water. You have no credibility.

 

I proved he told the truth when he was standing there. It don't matter what he said 7 years later.

 

You proved nothing. You made a bogus truth statement based in his initial video. He went on to explain why he didnt see the plane at first and you think he is now lying.

You proved nothing more than, you like to cherry-pick statements to make your point. Again, another dishonest tactic.

 

videos that nist had 10 years to (*)(*)(*)(*) with? LMAO

Now if these were released upon receipt that would be another story.

Only takes a single digit iq ater seeing that all the people who stuck to the bombs story are dead to know that they were threatened to change their story.

 

Per the question you asked in your deleted message

here is Cloud explaining himself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=X09R95S3Jck


How honest is it of you to delete questions?

 

speaking of dishonest "tactics" hows that bs workin for ya?

 

IQ is not something you have a great deal of contact with. You can't prove any claims that those videos are false or faked....you just claim they are. Ya know, for someone who claims they have court experience....you really don't act/post like it. I think you're just the maintenance guy in a court house.

 

You proved nothing. Cloud made a bogus statement in an altered video 7 years later. He went on to explain why he didnt see a plane because he was watching the towers when it exploded.

You proved nothing more than, you like to cherry-pick lies to make your point. Again, another dishonest tactic from a defeated troll.

I just caught the second explosion on videotape...No, a bomb, I saw it, NO PLANE HIT NOTHIN', the building exploded from the other tower floors down."

NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 1-3 (WTC2 Plane Impact, 9:03am) - YouTube

 

Here's another phone/call interview with Clifton Cloud. He debunks your claim. YOU LOSE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5bYgFN8Wg

 

I guess you didnt watch the video, huh?...why?...too dishonest?...afraid Cloud is going to prove you wrong? (Hint: he does)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5bYgFN8Wg

 

Here's what he said when it happened. YOU ARE INSANE. I guess you didnt listen to the video, huh?...why?...too dishonest?...afraid Cloud is going to prove himself right? (Hint: he does)

"I just caught the second explosion on videotape...No, a bomb, I saw it, NO PLANE HIT NOTHIN', the building exploded from the other tower floors down."

NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 1-3 (WTC2 Plane Impact, 9:03am) - YouTube

 

Here's another phone/call interview with Clifton Cloud. He debunks your claim. YOU LOSE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5bYgFN8Wg

 

Hmmm what a shot in the foot. IQ is not something you can touch. They are already proven and acknowledged by nist.

 

Really?...that would be news to everyone! Of course, I know you can't provide proof the videos are faked...AND, you can back up the claim the NIST acknowledged this.

I think you should wear you Depends on your head cause, thats the end the (*)(*)(*)(*) is coming out of.

 

proof has been provided, as I said, not my problem you do not understand it.

 

yeah, no. All you have provided are, assertions. You make claims and assumption you can't back. Not to mention, your claims have been debunked. Try again.

 

All you have provided are, assertions. You make claims and assumptions you can't prove. Not to mention, your real plane claims have been debunked. Fail again.