NO evidence of nationwide election fraud!!

Don't know about that. The reason they''re keeping the stores boarded up is for when the Biden coronation is overturned the left will riot and loot as always. Trumpsters just don't do that.

 

This isn't going to age well

 

Holy cow.....you've only havegot to wait til Dec.12, or so! Where is your patience? Com'on man! You know the thing! We waited 3-1/2 years for"collusion coup" to be dropped!

 

What does your claim not aging well have to do with waiting till Dec 12? My comment has nothing to do with patience. It has to do with the fact that your claim is not going to happen.
I didn't realize you were part of Trump's administration waiting for the collusion "coup" to be dropped. Are you still with his administration or have you been fired like most everyone else?

 

Wrong. There was substantial evidence that Trump & Russia had a thing going. The Mueller Investigation was created to resolve that question. Barr twisted the conclusions of the Mueller Report BEFORE it was actually released publicly, thus providing the foundation for Trump supporters' doubt. Mueller himself said there was sufficient evidence of collusion to charge anyone else other than the President, but Mueller admitted working under a FBI policy that no charges can be levied against a sitting President. That prevented further action by authorities. Trump liked to brag that no evidence was found. But over 20 people involved in that investigation were charged with criminal actions. Many of those were Russians in Russia, who we couldn't arrest. Trump's claim that there was no evidence of wrongdoing was a lie, but most Trump supporters accepted it without question. Most still do.

The Mueller Report was substantial enough to warrant the House Impeachment, but Senate Republicans failed to follow up with that action, allowing Trump to remain in office for the remainder of his term. At the time, Senate Republicans frequently said, "Let the people decide Trump's guilt or innocence in the 2020 election." Well, they did. Yea for the people !!!!

 

You just keep saying that. It's just like the media keeps repeating Creepy Joe is President Elect. If you repeat it often enough, the people might believe you. It's going to be very hard for you when the Big Guy and Dr. Jill bet the boot!

 

Just as you keep saying Trump will win. If you repeat if often enough, the people might believe you.

 

You ignore any evidence and over 200 signed affidavits. I don't need to say more. All you ever had was anonymous witnesses and FBI that got fired.

 

A) Affidavits aren't evidence
B) You guys can't keep the talking points straight. You say over 200, another person on here said over 1,000 signed affidavits. Which is it?
C) I never had anonymous witnesses or FBI that got fired for anything. No idea what you're even talking about.

 

I believe you do.....but that's just me.

 

Um...ok. I really don't but whatever

 

Ignore the truth if you must, that however us what's being reported

 

Still in denial with anger. Ooh, that's bad.

 

Not by any reputable new org.

 

oooooh anger and hate! Da Nile is a river in Africa. We'll see anger and hate when those stores are burnt and looted of the plywood!

 

And their in lies the rub, we don't even agree about what constitutes a reputable news source...

 

One writing conspiracy theory stories are not reputable.

 

Well then you should tell your "reputable" sources to quit writing them.

 

Oh get real they knew they had no evidence of illegal collusion before the Mueller investigation ever began and nothing they did ever found any though God knows they tried.

 

This has been investigated and found to be false. Investigate the investigators. The (first) investigation was properly predicated. Trump's team came to this conclusion.

 

I believe that if Hitler lived in America right now, he would be a Republican, and him and Mitch would be fantastic friends.

 

BS.

 

No, it's not BS. It wasn't that long ago. Look it up. The investigation found one improper FISA warrant. The predicate was proper.

 

And another one bites the dust...
“U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann turned down the request for an injunction, dealing another blow to Trump's hopes of invalidating the election's results.
In his 37-page ruling, Brann said the Trump campaign asked him to “disenfranchise almost seven million voters” and said he could not find any case in which a plaintiff “has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election.”
With such a request, the judge said, one might expect compelling legal argument “and factual proof of rampant corruption.” Instead, Brann added, “this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

Hahaha....suck it

 

If you believe that, you are sadly misinformed, &/or easy prey for the Trump propaganda machine.