http://youtu.be/3i9ra-i6Knc Noam invites AE911 to submit their evidence to MIT. Will they (finally) do something other than fund-raise?
Of course not. 2,000 members which they managed to desperately scrape together after 5 years of constant road trips, awareness campaigns and activism, and they are still yet to publish any kind of science or take legal action. They are a pathetic waste of time that only exist to give Gage an income.
Chomsky is saying things he obviously doesn't believe himself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhrZ57XxYJU There are several theories on why he does this. Some people think he's a sleeper agent. I would bet that he's being threatened. I'd bet some government goons paid him a visit and made him an offer he couldn't refuse. He says those architects and engineers should write articles for science journals. Science journals are controlled as tightly as the media are. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA (00:16 time mark) Chomsky himself explains how the media work. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=chomsky+media&aq=f http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710--.htm http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/MediaControl_Chomsky.html He knows they wouldn't publish anything subversive. Chomsky is working as a government sophist now as are several other anti-establishment pundits. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ-R-6k48qc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxSRGgJ5gjY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQd86qOONls Chomsky's writing have hurt the government so much that I'd bet he's not a sleeper agent. http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman /ThirdWorldFascism_ChomHer.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PdJ9TAdTdA I'd bet he's been threatened as he's no moron. He knows 9/11 was an inside job.
WRONG. Chomsky knows that 9-11 was committed, planned, and funded by Islamic extremists who are tired of the USA throwing its weight around like they are King of the Earth. when you (*)(*)(*)(*) with a society for decades, they will eventually (*)(*)(*)(*) you back. that's what happened on 9-11.
No. I've read a lot of Chomsky's works. He is usually very scientific and not dogmatic. Suddenly, he's very unscientific and dogmatic. He usually has neither a naive willingness to believe, nor an a priori incredulity. Now he has both. People don't do one hundred percent changes in their way of analyzing things overnight. It's true that a lot of Arabians would have liked to carry out something like the 9/11 attacks but the evidence all points to an inside job. Here's a link to some of it. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746 spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144746
all the best evidence points to 9-11 being carried out by Muslim extremists. at most, the US govt. knew about the coming attacks and worked to prevent its discovery. inside job? bollocks. the science says it wasn't an inside job.
Evedently,you know jack about chomsky,and your 'spurstalk' crap didn't fly with your moon hoax crap,and it won't with your 9/11 crap..
Basically what this says is, "He's right when he agrees with me, but lately he doesn't agree with me so that means that he is wrong, or worse! When you get evidence, post it. Someone may acknowledge it.
Hey,I know when I want to find out about 9/11 conspiracies,I'd go to a board discussing things like who the best shooter is from the three point line.....
No, those architects and engineers are pitching woo and as long as they keep their woo from peer-review, they can continue to pitch it. That's why they are AFRAID to publish. No control needed.
What makes you think they'd even be allowed to publish? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA (00:16 time mark) Science journals are as controlled as the media are. Go check out post #3.
Anyone can submit for peer-review. If that peer-review holds up to the scrutiny of the peer, then one can seek publication. I don't need to check out post #3, I have a number of friends how submit for peer-review and are published quite often. I A&E cannot past the musters of a peer-review, they obviously have not done their work.
...or it's too subversive. Do you think a science journal would publish analyses of these anomalies from the Apollo footage? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gn6MTrin5eU (2:35 time mark) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00 I'd bet they's say it wasn't a serious submision and reject it. They'd say they only dealt with serious issues. That's what some moderators on science forums have told me when explaining why they delete my posts.
You've completely jumped the shark! I'm sorry you believe in so much woo. Your issue, not mine. Perhaps you should check the validity of your claims rather than claiming everyone is against you. Ever here of a "common denominator"?
Hmm, maybe Chomsky didn't see this... [video=youtube;k2Trj_5J02k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k[/video] This video not only shows that the media had foreknowledge of the demolition (albeit the BBC claims that knowledge was second hand), but it also shows obvious explosive charges going off just prior to its collapse. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.h tml "Pull it"- Larry Silverstein
*sigh* this old crap again? They had been expecting 7 to collapse all day,in fact they were measuring it's sag with a transit line And that report wasn't the first thing they got wrong in the chaos that was 9/11
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.html So, they were eagerly EXPECTING something to happen which has never happened before in the history of the world. And they were so certain that this unheard of thing would happen that they reported it before it happened? Cool story bro.
I've lost track of how many times I've seen that video.....youtube is the conspiracy nuts dreamland there were NO 'explosions'
