Nukes: the less used weapons ever

Discussion in 'Nuclear, Chemical & Bio Weapons' started by AlpinLuke, Apr 24, 2015.

  1. AlpinLuke

    AlpinLuke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    6,559
    Likes Received:
    588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Have you ever spent a thought about the usage rate of nuclear weaponry, I mean real usage in battle.

    We can count nukes used for real in combat using the fingers of a single hand: 2 [two].

    How many nuclear weapons have been produced in the world?

    Some estimates say that in 1985 there were more than 60,000 nuclear active weapons ...

    This would mean a usage rate of 2 / 60,000 =[TABLE="width: 94"]
    [TR]
    [TD="class: xl33, width: 94, align: right"]0,0000333333[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    Or 1 nuke used every 30,000 nukes produced.

    Considering costs, one could infer that the nuclear weapon is the less efficient and more economically expense weapon ever ...

    :oldman: Eh no. Since the existence of such an arsenal has practically avoided WW III and so the return of the investment in nukes is not represented by direct earns, but by avoided losses.
     
  2. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,494
    Likes Received:
    2,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And that is the main reason why so many were made, and are still in service. With conventional weapons, it becomes to tempting to use them someday.

    When you spend a lot of money building Battleships tanks, and Bombers, it becomes tempting to use them to take over land. And when the enemy has the same thing, most of the damage is minimal and constrained to the military of the other side.

    When the weapons can destroy entire cities in a single use and kill huge numbers of civilians (especially the leadership) it becomes much less appealing of a weapon to use, and is then only used to ensure that the threat of your weapons prevents them from being used against you.
     
  3. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Or in the 21st Century especially when looking at California, use them to take over water.

    I need to compare California's National Guard to Oregon's and Washington's National Guard.
     
  4. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,278
    Likes Received:
    22,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would say the economic price of those nukes were well worth it to avoid World War 3.
     
  5. Panzerkampfwagen

    Panzerkampfwagen New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    11,570
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anti satellite missiles exist but they've never been used in a war. That's 0 use.
     

Share This Page