NZ defends “stupid fat Australian b****” racism court ruling

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by truth and justice, Nov 23, 2012.

  1. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,866
    Likes Received:
    8,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10849174

    Calling someone stupid or fat or b***** is ok. Threaten to kill the dog is ok. Calling someone Austrailan then you are guilty of racially aggravated public disorder. Oh dear!

    "She called me a stupid fat Australian b****. Because of my accent there can be some confusion over my nationality. She knew I was New Zealand," Ms O'Reilly said.

    How much did this case cost.........
     
  2. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47,159
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Nanny State is tyranny. Wake the frack up, progressives.
     
  3. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    14,876
    Likes Received:
    4,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not true. Calling someone a "stupid fat b****" and threatening to kill a dog (in a similar context) would be public disorder. Just calling someone Australian isn't illegal at all. The racial aggravation aspect doesn't create the crime, it just augments it (not that I agree with that in principal but I don't agree with dishonesty either).
     
  4. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,866
    Likes Received:
    8,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except she was found guilty because she used the word "australian" in the sentence. She was found guilty of racism, not threatening behaviour

    But the story was from The Daily Mail, and knowing them, the whole story was probably not all there
     
  5. ThirdTerm

    ThirdTerm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,324
    Likes Received:
    461
    Trophy Points:
    83
  6. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    14,876
    Likes Received:
    4,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry but you're simply wrong.

    The criminal offence as reported was "public disorder". The shouting, ranting, making threats and the like identify the public disorder and in itself it has nothing to do with racism. The "racism aggravation" aspect is additional to the core offence. Had she done and said exactly the same things but without using the word "Australian" she could (and all else being equal, probably would) have still been convicted of "public disorder".

    Almost certainly, and I bet the NZ Herald hack didn't make the slightest effort to check any facts. Copy, paste and insert your own by-line counts as "journalism" these days.
     

Share This Page