Obama Unable To Register For State Primary As Alabama Reviews His Eligibility

This seems to be heating up and I don't think Obama and his team were prepared for this type of strategy used by state citizens. It is also my opinion that because the political climate has changed, his chances in court become more risky. This type of challenges were not done at the state level during the presidential race in 2008. This will be interesting to watch and I'm sure the MSM is watching this closely too.

BARACK OBAMA UNABLE TO REGISTER FOR STATE PRIMARY AS ALABAMA REVIEWS HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE A CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31406.php

UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.

Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to "prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings."

The deadline for any candidate to register to appear on the Alabama Presidential Primary ballot is just days away, but by agreeing to hear the case, the Alabama Courts have effectively stalled any efforts by the Democratic Party to place Obama on the ballot.

Just as important is the fact that the Court did indeed accept the case. By agreeing to hear the case, the Court appears to have recognized that the defendants, ordinary Alabama citizens, do in fact have standing. In many previous eligibility cases, courts have ruled that ordinary citizens did not have standing, in other words were not sufficiently harmed by the actions of the defendant and therefore had no legal right to bring their case before the courts.

The actions of this Alabama Court is a game changer in that the legal system has finally recognized that ordinary citizens CAN be harmed and DO have the right to protest unconstitutional actions committed at the highest levels of Federal government.


Additional link at Alabama TV station from the AP:

http://www.local15tv.com/news/local...tioned-in-Alabama/bQisq3dHbkWh3e6G8NRJIw.cspx

 

http://www.local15tv.com/news/local...tioned-in-Alabama/bQisq3dHbkWh3e6G8NRJIw.cspx[/QUOTE]

march 13 still aways off , why is he is so much a hurry..darn those states rights people

 

Amazing the lengths people are willing to go to deny the nation's first black president a chance at re-election.

 

lol- how many times have I heard a Birther say 'this is a game changer'?

But I will quote Dr. Conspiracy's article- refering to Georgia's case, which is the same situation- because I agree with his point of view:

"I’ve spent a lot of editorial energy on this site criticizing birthers and particularly their methods. I decry smears. I decry lies. I decry legal incompetence and frivolous lawsuits. But for once the Birthers have done the right thing.

The people of the State of Georgia in their wisdom have enacted legislation that allows Georgia voters to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on ballots in Georgia. The administrative lawsuit, Farrar v Obama, to be heard this month in Atlanta is an exercise by Georgia citizens of their legal rights to challenge what the Georgia Secretary of State did in approving Barack Obama for the 2012 primary ballot. Judge Malihi agreed when rejecting a motion to dismiss by Obama’s attorney Michael Jablonski.

Don’t misunderstand. I think Birther claims are the worst kind of nonsense. There are no legitimate grounds under which Barack Obama can be excluded from the presidential ballot, but that is beside the point. Birthers believe otherwise, and in Georgia they have the legal right to have those claims examined in court. So I applaud the birthers for following the law and seeking to have their grievances examined in an appropriate venue. What I fail to see is any respected anti-birther raising an objection to the Georgia process. Both sides have come together to agree on the rules of the contest.

That’s for now. There are a number of factors that will certainly upset the idyllic scene. The first factor is Orly Taitz, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys. Keep in mind that the success the Birthers have had in Georgia is not due to Orly Taitz. She didn’t guide them through the process, and she didn’t write the motion that prevailed and prevented dismissal. We can expect Orly to engage in the same deplorable legal demeanor that we’ve seen before. The second factor is that there will be a winner and there will be a loser, and this has to happen advance of the March 6 Georgia Primary. The birthers, specifically, will lose. Once that happens, they will crucify Judge Malihi and deny the validity of the process that they themselves selected. It’s their nature"

Now I just wonder if there is any Democrat as idiotic as the Birthers are, who will challenge whether any Republicans are elgible. We know Obama was born in the U.S...we just assume all of them were.

 

And the Spirit of the Old South still lives.

 

I'm still wanting to recall his name on the ballot in Indiana which he did not qualify for in 2008.

 

They are just following their election ballot statutes that gives them the right to proceed in this manner. That's all.

 

Just the opposite. Obozo would have never become president but for his black skin. Never would have gotten into harvard either on merit. He's a pure afffirmative action baby.

 

Amazing how much racists love playing the race card.

 

Agreed!!! This action has nothing to do about race.

 

He got 5% more of the black vote than Clinton did. try harder bro.

 

how did he not qualify in idiana?

 

of course it does. you are only demanding OBAMA provide evidence of eligibility. You are not demanding it of any other candidate. ONLY obama.

even though obama is the ONLY president or presidential candidate in US history who has ever proven his eligibility for the office.

 

Obama, the first black President of the United States, has shown 2 verified forms of proof of birth in Hawaii.

Most US Presidents haven't even had to show one.

It's NO coincidence.

 

You are supposed to be fair and color blind. It would seem that you are not. If Obama's opponents are to be fair and color blind..so should his allies.

 

you are incorrect. NO other president, or presidential candidate in the entirety of US history has ever shown a birth certificate.

 

Well actually they have for McCain in 2000 and Barry Goldwater in '64 but i agree that this is a non issue some of these people just cannot stand the fact that a black man is there commander in chief, i dont like Obama but i want to beat him in the up coming election not trying some sneaky BS to get him off the Ballots ffs

 

Obama used similar sneaky BS to get his opponents off the ballot when he ran for his first political office. What goes around comes around.

 

I didn't realize that Bill Clinton was running again.

AS IF Obama's race is the issue; notice , it's ALWAYS THE LEFTISTS who mention race...ALWAYS.

 

Very astute. This is the same tactic Obama used and these citizens are exercising the state ballot statutes on the books . Positive rep for you for recognizing this.

 

South is still burning that's all this tells me. Yawn.

 

Is there a particular question about the others?

 

For which one was there a cause to do so?

 

Obama was on the committee that vetted McCain.. it didn't take long.. The accusation that McC wasn't a US citizen was ridiculous.. just like its ridiculous that Maro Rubio or Jindal aren't citizens.

 

The other states where such actions have been filed don't count? That the lawyer behind it is from California, doesn't count?