Officer Darren Wilson Suffered Orbital Blowout Fracture to Eye Socket

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Eternal Footman, Aug 19, 2014.

  1. Dollface

    Dollface New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would not have wrote it if I could not back it up. What I have learned here at PF is it does little good to source things here. Lies, racism, and bigotry seem to be the only thing that matters
     
  2. PT Again

    PT Again New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2014
    Messages:
    3,127
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But I see you didn't back it up............."sources" is not a source.

    its not better than Fox's "source"
     
  3. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That crap reputation network has slightly less viewers on average than ALL the rest put together.

    http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/08/22/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-21-2014/295739/

    Why? Because most folks can smell what's coming off the dung heap of the rest.
     
  4. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you watched it you would know.. Try again.
     
  5. Dollface

    Dollface New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh how silly it already had been backed up do you really want to go on with this??? You will lose!!
     
  6. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do have a point there, I must admit. He hasn't been vetted since he doesn't want a nation of race-baiters and race-agitators on the Left to attack him or his family on national television, thus ruining his life. But it is almost the same as the way that those same race-agitators on the Left used as their primary authority from day one a fellow that they made up their mind NOT TO VET while they had his full name and actually listened to him pretty much confess to being THE co-perpetrator of the assault on the officer; not bothering to point that out to the nation AS they relayed his tainted statement as unassailable gospel.

    Yeah . . . as we all know from that inspirational example from the hate-filled leftwing media in this nation, not vetting is very bad. But so far as that goes it's hardly their first time to do something terrible like that to a nation. After all they absolutely refused to vet Barack Obama as well . . . and look how that lack of journalistic ethics turned out for this nation. Very badly indeed!

    Snap! I almost forgot who else the Left positively refused to vet for the longest time . . . Trayvon Martin while they simply pulled things out of their crap orifice to build him up as a saint to the nation. If it hadn't been for pesky old Fox News and Drudge Report and Conservative Talk Radio to this day the nation wouldn't know about Saint Martin's thugish background activities. Go figure.
     
  7. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The news network, formerly nicknamed The Clinton News Network, is credible? Wow! They are almost always hard Left in any form of reporting. One more thing. I just watched the sainted video segment from CNN and, yes, it is more unnamed sources. So their unnamed source denies what another unnamed source stated. Yesssssssssssssssss . . . incredibly authoritative from CNN and the leftwing media in general.
     
  8. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently not. I just reviewed your precious video and all the Left ended up doing was use an unnamed source to 'attempt' to discredit another . . . unnamed source. So it's still rumor against rumor with one exception. It turned out that the officer was undeniably taken to the hospital and that he did have at a minimum a swollen face. Pssssst . . . even for the average whimpy leftwinger it would take a considerable face pounding to create a swollen face in that brief amount of time from the altercation to the examination at the hospital. The Left's gentle-giant did NOT deliver a gentle love tap with his six feet four inches tall three hundred pounds body. Heck, such a mighty blow probably WOULD have completely disabled the average latte sipping, Birkenstock wearing, gated community living, lifetime trust fund liberal . . . just saying.
     
  9. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did watch it. There is a difference between an official report and fooling around. The part that you are calling "lying" is the part that was fooling around.
     
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No you were just called on our ignorance based slur and next time can the selective edit to make it appear I said something I didn't. Here in context.

    Yes we over here know how ignorant Europeans are of our news reporting and politics and just about everything.

    And yes when it comes to the US the Europeans who show up here routinely express such ignorance.

    Yes. Falsifying evidence carries a big penalty here, but let's reverse this would it highly unusual for a criminal to bend to the truth to cover for his accomplice?

    Let's put it in perspective, their were other officers from other police force at the scene along with citizens observing.

    This is just another example of the phony hypotheticals without premise just as happened in the Zimmerman case.

    Neither is FOX which is why FOX rates higher than all the others put together. CNN couches it's reporting and it discussions of the issues and tends to give a one sided view while FOX brings all sides to the table. That is what upsets the left, FOX gives the rightwing side the same coverage as the leftwing side. Go search the last Presidential debates and how the CNN correspondence who was supposed to be the impartial moderator injected herself into it giving Obama a win in that debate.

    "Allegations of bias[edit]
    CNN has been the subject of allegations of Liberal bias. In a joint study by the Joan Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by the three major cable networks of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of presidential primaries in 2007: “The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain faring the worst (63% negative) and Romney faring a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. With the exception of Obama, Democrats tended not to fare well either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator’s stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative, but both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. While Democrats on average tended to have more positive coverage, the trend was skewed by particularly positive coverage of Obama.[1] Many observers have said CNN promotes liberal political positions and biased reporting[2]

    Writer Eric Alterman has noted that many critics[who?] on the left view CNN as more biased than most other corporate-run journalism, supporting business interests of its parent company and sponsors, and refusing to question official sources or present perspectives of leftist critics.[3][need quotation to verify]

    Accuracy in Media and Media Research Center (MRC) have claimed that CNN's reporting contains liberal editorializing within news stories as well as omission of important facts.[citation needed] Former Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and MRC founder Brent Bozell, among others, have referred to CNN as the "Clinton News Network".[4] DeLay has also called it the "Communist News Network".[5] In its early days, CNN was sometimes referred to as "Chicken Noodle News".[6] In September 2009, a Pew Research Poll showed that Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to rate the network favorably, and Republicans were much more likely than Democrats to see CNN unfavorably.[7]"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies
     
  11. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you are claiming that a news source is not credible because it references its sources as anonymous, then you would also have to include all the RW news sources that say the same thing. Right? Just to be sure, any anonymous source would have phrases such as "according to a source close to.....," "according to an unnamed source," "from sources who do not wishto be identified,:" or "according ot my sources,"

    And beard in mind, those same phrases were used in the OP article and thus, according ot you, that news story is not credible.
     
  12. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there is no fracture, none. This entire thread is pointless.
     
  13. PT Again

    PT Again New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2014
    Messages:
    3,127
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    source?
     
  14. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only race baiting I have seen has been on the right wing side here. Shall we look at the number of threads started by RW posters who allude, infer, or state unequivocally that Blacks are not to be trusted, not good at anything, or that they cause trouble the moment the enter your neighborhood. Please. Don't go there with that.

    What is not race baiting is the calling for an investigation of the shooting. What we have here are two different stories, or versions, based on the same event. Officer Wilson has his version, other people have theirs. And the only way to get to the truth is through an investigation. Personally, it should be handled by IA of the police department, but given the nature of the incidents that have followed, that task has now been regulated to the grand jury. They will look at the evidence presented and make their decision. And keep in mind, there is always a chance in which the jury will not indict and there is always a chance in which the jury will indict. That is the process and the rule of law.
     
  15. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Source? are you kidding? you must be in hiding. how fox got this lie going is all over the media just now.



    Dear Republicans: TRUTH IS NOT HARD!
     
  16. Dollface

    Dollface New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    haha a right winger asking for a source on this forum lol
     
  17. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would district attorneys withhold evidence that would exonerate people they prosecute? Happens ALL the time.
     
  18. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You realize that the X-rays and MRI's will be used as a defense at the the grand jury or the trial don't you?
     
  19. Capitalism

    Capitalism Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    5,129
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No evidence, this post is invalid.
     
  20. Cloak

    Cloak New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmm, a fringe blog with a proven record of misinformation, run by someone frequently referred to as "the dumbest man on the internet" vs. an actual news network. Which should I listen to?
     
  21. YouLie

    YouLie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10,177
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The best evidence, or lack of, will be the presence of Mr. Brown's fingerprints on Officer Wilson's weapon. We'll see.
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The CNN report and reporter are conflicting and confusing and don't seem very well sourced. He says "torn", torn is quite different from "fracture" and he seems utterly confused in exactly what he is trying to say.

    “The source says it is not true, at all, he did not have a torn eye socket,” Lemon said. “Unequivocally.”

    But fractured, torn or not, the report confirms he sustained injury to face.
     
  23. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is only to your own fanatic right wing perception. You, no doubt, are well aware that the accuracy of Fox news is mocked in the US by many Americans in your random late night tv show and average cartoon like the simpsons, southpark, American dad, family guy etc. Those Americans and most of Europe is well aware that many Americans swallow the right wing semi fabricated indoctrinating "news" of Fox.

    It is a fact that police officers falsify reports on occasions. You can not really trust their word for it.

    Yeah. I saw that. They bring both sides at the table. So the dissident gets yelled at and his mic cut off.
    That is how Fox makes an intellectual debate with the all sides at the table.
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No it is evidence everyday on this board when foreigners come here and try to talk about the United States and our government and our laws and our peoples.

    Yeah the leftest who prove constantly how misinformed on issues, even do so right here on this forum.

    Thanks for proving my point, I was listening on the way home tonight to a discussion of Obama and how he has screwed up our foreign policy, Pat Caddel and David Shrum were the panelist. They are two of the top most respected Democrat LIBERAL consultants out there. You see FOX gives BOTH sides in a fair and balance manner so so much for the phony ignorance indoctrination claims, ANY show that has a conservative giving a view point is consider right-wing by the left no matter that their side is also given an airing of views. Give the right side and your brand right-wing propaganda.

    You are doing a good job of sustaining that point.
    And criminals lie ALL the time, but the fact is the police report is put up for corroboration and we have that. Your attempts at simple dismissal notwithstanding.

    Wait a minute you said you don't watch them how would you know this? And the only time someone gets a mic cut off is when THEY are yelling and THEY are ranting and no answering questions asked, of COURSE they will move on from them they add nothing to an intellectual discussion of the issues.

    But do give me some examples of which you speak. Else stick to criticizing your own lame leftist media.
     

Share This Page