Oklahoma - 3 youths hunt down Aussie >>>MOD EDIT<<<

Uh huh... in all your complete vagueness I guess that should have been assumed.
I think you're the only one waiting for Lapierre to utter a word.


Anyway, how in the hell did you not find a way to tie this back to George Zimmerman?
I didn't realize that would ever happen.


Ok, back to waiting for Obama to comment on the death of a white person......

Wake me if it ever happens....

 

Go to MSNBC.com, cnn.com, cbsnews.com. Many more people visit their websites than watch their television programs.

Main story on all 3 networks. You just don't want to believe it.

 

I did ... see the Die mofos Die thread where the shooting-deaths of black-teens should be legal or a sport ... as a response to DonGlocks outrage and blame at Obama/Holder/Al/Jesses' Australian student shot dead in U.S. by three teenagers over on the new racisss-waste disposal-site tPF.

 

Ala!!?? What're you....... some kinda muslim?

- - - Updated - - -

Zimmerman was not arrested and charged. Der de der der der.

 

It was the cover story on all of the major news sites...

They get more online traffic than they do TV traffic...

All it takes is a quick bit of typing...

In fact, I just checked MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News...

You know where it's not the cover story?

Fox News...

 

That's likely because they wanted to get facts straight before mentioning it, aside from the fact that they were all technically juveniles, and authorities likely hadn't released that info yet...

Also, you do recall that the outrage about the Zimmerman case was primarily generated by the fact that he wasn't arrested, correct?

 

Oh really?

 

I would agree that they are different as a whole, but the parts I am comparing is the way the race of the suspects was handled. Zimmerman was white day one, no one waited for the facts... how long does it take people to figure out the race of perps? If it doesnt matter, why say it at all with zimmerman? Furthermore , the jury confirmed that Zimmerman should never have been arrested in the first place.

 

It's not "ideal", but these kinds of things are just "bumps along the road" toward racial egalitarian utopia. Lane's family can at least take comfort in knowing they helped sacrifice for the good of multiculturalism.

 

It's going to be interesting to find out, but my guess is that the kids are going to turn out to be the offspring of good, Christian, militia members.

 

It shouldn't have mattered in either case...

 

Doubt it. The shooters.

 

I don't think there is a racial motive here...the shooters at Columbine were white...the Aurora movie theater...a white guy....

At least one of the suspects in this shooting had a father as he commented his son was not affiliated with a gang...
the bottom line is some people are simply bad seeds. The rest of society should be protected from them for sure...regardless of their apparent youth, they are dangerous and if found guilty should never see the light of day outside of prison walls again.

 

When the story first broke, the liberal media was showing the pictures of three white teenagers, creating the illusion that the shooters were white. The three white teenagers turned out to friends of the victim, and not the little terrorists.

So far none of the liberal media has shown pictures of the three black teenagers -- not even Fox. The liberal media seems to be proud that it has managed to create the false impression that the miscreants were white.

 

You have to go overseas to find out.

http://www.news.com.au/national-new...-lane-identified/story-fnii5sms-1226700172461

- - - Updated - - -

Edwards holding a small caliber rifle on his facebook page.

 

In Australia they have gun regulation, and bad guys don't have gun's there. There would no drive by's in his home country, because their violent crimes only consist of knives.

He would have been safer in Australia than here.

 

Um, every story I read, up until they actually released the perps identities, said that the shoters had not been identified...

You wouldn't be making things up would you?

 

So we're supposed to track your posting history on multiple forums so that we can decipher a complete thought from you ?!

Seriously ?


Do you mean the tPF where you said:
"PF (meaning this forum) has now re-invented itself to re-accomodating white-raciss hillbilly trailer-trash ... very scummmy now ... LOL."

Now, instead of insulting THIS forum, you use the same insult against THAT forum ?!

How odd. You just blow with the wind, eh.... I mean bans.

 

In Australia, most aborigines (indigenous people) are allowed to own guns. Although white people in Australia are not permitted to have guns, criminals, as in the U.S., do have guns.

 

Care to cite that?

 

The minorities in Australia benefit from gun regulations which have them to be armed, to defend themselves against further intrusions by the whites. According to history they were pillaged and brutalized by the whites who stole land from the native aboriginal races.

If America had similar gun regulation where only minorities are armed to defend themselves, and whites weren't, the Aussie would have been safe and alive today.

 

It shouldn't , but it will always be around .

 

The only caveat to the answer is demographics. People in rural areas have easier access to certain classes of weapons. So if more Aboriginals live on the land as a percentage of population, it could be construed they have greater freedoms with gun ownership

 

No, MORE innocent people would be killed. You do know that these monsters were black right?

Edit: I just realized that your post was sarcasm at the end there....

 

I'll admit that that's probably an unfortunate fact...