One Nation, what a bitches brew party....

Yes, it does. But I think you will find it speaks rather more volumes than you think…


Let us look at your assumption,” it was YOUR own extremist rightwing Rupert Murdoch who pioneered the concept of "ambush journalism" in the first place”

My media??? Your showing your bias here…

Now after building your strawman and trying to condemn me with it let me point out, I am not discussing media in general, pure and simple this one organisations decisions to make their journalism political. IT was YOU who thought to decide that must mean this discussion was about entire media group.



Secondly, Mal practice??? That is again YOUR assertions not mine. My assertion is that selected interference is maleficent. Due to their intent on making their journalism political they have actually had the reverse affect than intended. I use further rise of the Palmer party as reference and the fact the intended negative press has promoted them as well.


BUT anyway, since it is YOUR strawman you want to argue, perhaps you will fill the argument with more disinformation. Now that is Irony, not your supposed theory .

 

[

AKA the media!

Journalists PLURAL as in more than just a single one.

Trying to squirm out of your own misuse of terminology duly noted but that is entirely your problem, not mine!

Semantic squirming duly noted for the record!

But thank you for PROVING my point about your Rupert Murdoch and his "maleficent" influence upon political journalism.

Did you call him out when he first started this practice in order to grow his media empire?

Do you spurn all of his publications and media outlets?

Or are you just cherry picking because it suits your purpose to do so?

 

Actually NO. Again building strawman.

Yes, it does. Messengers also Plural… Now are you trying to assert only ONE journalist was involved in this??? I don’t have to assume that there was several journalists who conspired to create this sting, record this sting and decide when to report this sting. BUT hey, if you think that applies to one, more power to you.

Squirming No, as maintained I have focused on the one media group all along, it is your who is trying to create a strawman to berate me. Since it is your strawman, then it is your problem not mine.

Proving your point??? You built a strawman and demand I support Murdock press because… and your point is???

Sorry irrelevant dribble dually noted. Now thanks for filling in your strawman… got some more???

 

Thank you for proving my point!

Have a nice day!

 

That is fine, whatever floats your boat...