One Year Later Still NO Evidence of Trump Collusion with Russia

Still waiting for the proof. Biggest fake news story of all time. And they wonder why fake news CNN is not trusted or believed. I'll post some videos here, you know, just like evidence, of stupid democrat politicians admitting that the whole Russia/Trump collusion story is bogus. Wait for it.

Do you know how stupid that sounds? Like Putin is really glued to his seat watching Trump on TV awaiting Trump's command to use Russian hackers to go after Hillary? Liberals have no sense of humor. It was a JOKE! That's why people laughed. You know that Russia has been engaged in illegal behavior and spying on the US for 100 years now, right?

I was in the intelligence field at one time and frankly, I haven't seen any proof that Russia interfered with the election. How did Russia interfere with the election? Obama said that Russia did not change the votes, did not hack voting systems. Please explain to me how Russia interfered with the election?

Yeah, so? Perhaps because Al Franken doesn't understand basic English.

I wouldn't know about that because I've heard that claim but have seen no evidence of it. I don't know who did that or if it was approved. But I find it interesting that democrats all of a sudden care about Ukraine after Obama did nothing when Putin invaded Crimea, did nothing when they invaded Eastern Ukraine, all the while Obama selling our uranium to Russia.

I just saw Senator Feinstein on TV and Jake Tapper asked her if there was any Trump/Russia collusion, and she said no. He asked her if there was any evidence the Trump campaign got Russia to divert the emails through WikiLeaks, answer, no.

Seems to me the timing of the Access Hollywood tape is more evidence of collusion between the MSM/NBC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. No coincidence that it was leaked so close to the election.

 

You said you wanted evidence and now you want proof? Moving the goal post.

Don't care about the project veritas videos. They have proven themselves felonious and untrustworthy through selective editing multiple times over.

The man explicitly and openly asked Russian hackers to engage in illegal behavior in an effort to hurt his political opponent.

Here you go: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Setting aside that Jeff Sessions is only one of about 8 Trump associates who have retracted their statement, the most recent revelation regarding Popuadopolist forced Sessions to suddenly recall a conversation that he said never took place. And he said such while under oath.

J.D. Gordon

And Obama imposed economic sanctions on Russia following Crimea.

I'm curious, when did this interview take place?

Seems to me that you see what you want to see. The DNC emails were released the day after Trump altered the GOP stance on Crimea and Trump started to echo Russian talking points ("the people of Crimea want to be Russian"). The Podesta emails were released the day after the Hollywood Access tape dropped.

 

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...nce-sotu.cnn/video/playlists/top-news-videos/

The veteran swamp monsters know better then to dirty themselves in such BS.

 

No, because there is neither evidence nor proof.

Huh? Never said anything about Project Veritas.

IT WAS ALREADY KNOWN THAT RUSSIA HACKED THE DEMOCRATS!

The Russians engage in that illegal behavior already! They don't get their marching orders from Trump!

Do you not understand a joke?

From your source: "We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election."

I tried reading that crap and it was a big nothingburger. No evidence presented at all.

Well I would say that is a lie. Haven't seen him retract anything and I watched his entire testimony. He did give it to lying Al Frankenstein, the fricking moron from Minnesota.

A slight change in wording and semantics isn't a dramatic shift in Ukraine policy. I read that article and one again fake news BS. The wording agreed upon was still pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia! God I hate it when I fall for your guy's fake news BS!

I saw it on Fox but it was a clip from CNN which I believe was a Sunday show from yesterday.

Didn't see this in the story you posted. Show some proof yourself instead of making false claims the get passed around like liberal democrat stink bombs.

 

Evidence is proof.

 

Ask again AFTER Mueller COMPLETES his investigation.

Apparently, some on the RW seem to be unable to grasp how investigations operate.

 

One wonders when the Trump/Russia collusion will appear. So far...nothing

 

We know now, for a fact, that members of the Trump campaign team in the very least ATTEMPTED to collude with Russia. And we have a mountain of lies and cover ups from all over the campaign that tried to keep that information from getting out. The only argument Trump supporters have left is that the either the campaign team was incompetent in their attempt or that the Russians changed their mind about helping him.

The "they would never" argument is dead in the water. In the very least, they conspired to do so.

 

Oddly it appears that almost everyone in the Trump admin had meetings with the Russians that they lied about.

Derp

 

Not sorry, still see no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion. Please show some evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. Everyone in the Trump admin had a meeting with the Russians that they lied about? I don't think so. Nobody had any meetings with Russian officials as a representative of the Trump campaign that I have seen yet.

 

Can't see with your eyes closed

 

To the Left, talking to Russians is collusion -- but ONLY for Right of Center politicians. Hillary AND the DNC knowing working with the Russians through the Fusion Group cut out and Steele in order to purchase a fake dossier on Trump from the Russians with the express intention of changing the outcome of a presidential election, however IS NOT COLLUSION to these leftists because leftists did it. End . . . of . . . story; and the entire nation knows that the Dem Party leadership actually did what the DNC and Hillary falsely accused Trump and his people of doing.

 

Why don't you open your eyes? Here are top democrats admitting there is no evidence of Trump collusion with Russia:

 

Tell it to the judge. Mueller clearly is pursuing people and prosecuting people, with more to come soon.

It appears that Trump Jr was soliciting the notion of lifting sanctions for dirt on H, in the now infamous meeting at t tower. That clearly is evidence of the intent to commit a crime,

Collusion isn't a crime. The crime will be conspiracy. And conspiracy against the US charges have already been filed against Manafort and Gates.

 

So what?

A year after the Watergate break-in, the "smoking gun" tape had yet to be released.

Patience, grasshopper.

 

If they pretended to be defending Obama or even Hillary, no doubt at all their story would radically change.

 

They are trying to send people to jail. Where the hell is the proof?

 

None of that means there is dirt on Trump. Try this tactic. Imagine you are defending Obama or Hillary. what evidence would you see against either?

 

Clearly, the "nothingburger" meme that was issued for the toadies to parrot failed, and so have the desperate, "Hey! Look over there!" attempts at diversion.

The Trump Justice Department Special Counsel is impervious to such nonsense, as well as to schisstorms of pissytweets.

The FBI, NSA, and CIA all confirmed that Russia attempted to pervert the US election in Trump's favour, and a matter of such vital national security transcends hyper-partisans being in a snit.

The investigation must proceed and it will find what it will find. If everyone implicated walks, so be it.

Whining is futile.

 

Yet.. still nothing.

 

Please, show me one iota of evidence of collusion. I'm begging people, yet, so far the charges of the MSM for a whole year has been a yuge nothingburger as confirmed by the democrat leaders themselves. (See video in post #13)

Oh, and the CIA, FBI and NSA confirmed the Russians attempted to pervert the US election in favor of Trump how? Based on what intelligence evidence? The phony paid for by Hillary & DNC Russian dossier?

 

You could say the exact same thing about the accusations against Hillary, except that (1) she's been investigated even longer and (2) the party that opposes her controls the government. So what's the deal? Why no allegations against her? Why no prosecution?

Ohhh, it's because you only believe conspiracy theories that suit your narrow-minded political narrative. Well, good luck with that. Some of us prefer to live in the real world.

 

First off, that's a lie. I haven't seen one investigation opened into Hillary Clinton's collusion, which she herself admits to doing, with Russian in generating a dossier full of lies intended to effect the outcome of the election. Correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Has she been investigated or not?