https://www.globalresearch.ca/syria...rding-alleged-chemical-weapons-attack/5694146 The international chemical weapons organization cheated and lied regarding Douma, and the result was more involvement by US and European sources. Who bribed them to suppress the truth? Why did they do it?
You're right--the article didn't mention Boeing. When I read the article the cheating reminded me of how Boeing cheated. Perhaps I should have used a different title, sorry. Point being that cheating by OPCW led to many deaths and much destruction. Their cheating provided the media with really juicy headlines and helped POTUS crank up the war. Those juicy headlines misled the public and demonized Assad. I reckon the cheating made Tel Aviv joyful.
Boeing put an aircraft into passenger service which they are now admitting had several ENGINEERING FLAWS OR ERRORS???Which is an admission that their pre passenger testing before service release was grossly inadequate resulting in many passenger deaths.
Aside from this not having much to do with Boeing... its a great rundown of a classic, textbook False Flag operation. Excellent article. This should be cited as 'exhibit A' every time our political establishment tries to convince us to invade a foreign power or muscle out a dictatorial regime.
Because we care about their citizens so much, we invade their countries killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions of them. Then we inform them of their liberation and the democracy that we've spread to them.
Articles like this are swept under the rug by MSM, demonstrating their role in the manipulation of the public perception. How can the war in Syria be legitimate when it is founded on falsehoods? How can the Global War Of Terror be legitimate when it is founded on falsehoods?
Well, sure both the Boeing 787's Lithium-Ion batteries with electric pressurization, and the Boeing 737 Max computer systems, and lack of proper pilot training debacle... however, your analogy does not hold here; not that I am so quick to agree with you on the chemical weapons issue, but even if I did the Boeing analogy is completely different. How so? Glad you asked... Boeing is still the number one commercial aircraft provider in the globe, though Airbus could conceivably overtake Boeing in a few years; in general, Boeing jets are impeccable pieces of aviation engineering--marvels really. Not to mention that when the Boeing 707 was first up and flying it has plenty of issues (See Al Haynes crash) and older 737's had issues landing in windshear--Airbus has problems similar historically too, but this is hardly the same by analogy as the claimed 100% lie you are making the case for in terms of chemical weapons inspectors.
Yes, I used a poor choice of words and analogy by including Boeing in the original post. The point, poorly made by me, is that just as Boeing cheated and lied, so did OPCW cheat and lie regarding the incident in Douma and probably others. Boeing cheated and lied for profits, nothing more. Why did OPCW cheat and lie? Obviously no money was made, but truth suffered and in the end, people died from the OPCW deception just as people died from the Boeing deception. OPCW merely served the propaganda interests of the US and Israel and other western countries who wanted to see Assad taken down. OPCW thereby became a propaganda organ for war criminals.
Did OPCW lie? It does not appear so: https://www.news.com.au/world/middl...k/news-story/d910d24c25210c70509249082b37f347
You offer an article from April of 2018, I offer an article from November 2019. Things can change you know. If you bother to read the more recent article you will see that yes indeed, OPCW lied. Keep up with the news Jacob, stay abreast of what's happening. OPCW lied about Douma and maybe a few more. We can only speculate as to why they did it, but they did it. The war of terror brought by the US and its partners is a hoax on the world, especially US taxpayers.
I do stay up to date, and the weight of evidence is that OPCW did not lie. Please use reputable news and data sources; so-called news filtered from 'sputnik; is not news.
All aircraft have engineering flaws or errors. You can't build a flawless, perfect aircraft. Even the legendary ones.
You stay up to date with "news sources" approved by your government. I am very much the opposite. The facts on the ground at Douma at the time showed it was a staged event. You buy into the mainstream/government talking points, while I reject the statements of known liars. You think as they want you to think, while I am very much the opposite.
Wrong, Airbus did overtake Boeing in sales as well as deliveries and profits. Boeing has slushed down to rank 2.
Not correct; Airbus is definitely catching up but not there yet. New orders for Airbus have recently surpassed Boeing's but overall profits are not higher yet. If Boeing keeps playing with bad engineering, then, yes, Airbus will surpass Boeing. This year: https://www.wsj.com/articles/airbus...eing-in-new-jet-orders-deliveries-11572369091 And last year total profits and defense contracts: https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/11/05/1-way-boeing-is-absolutely-crushing-airbus.aspx Operating profits and defense contracts keep Boeing number 1 in terms of capital, and saving 737 Max orders means more profits later this year.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/airbus...eing-in-new-jet-orders-deliveries-11572369091 I think we do great. On my flight to New Caledonia this year i was in a 787-9 and noticed whats wrong with Boeing. Too much nonsense features. Like the windows that get dark when you press a button. Why is that necessary? All other aircrafts you rise or drop the sun shield. Here you press a button and it takes 3 minutes until it gets transparent. Its laughable.
I hate the Boeing 787 and would never fly on it. I agree Airbus is better overall now comparing newer planes to new planes; no disagreement there. I love the Boeing 747, 757, 767, and 777, but the 787 is garbage as is the 737 MAX.
The 737 MAX makes for riskier investments if the issue is not fixed: https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/10/19/better-buy-boeing-vs-airbus.aspx
5 years of drought and the collapse of agriculture and the oil sector are NOT about demonizing Assad.
And more on the subject of OPCW deception on Douma. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/11...-opcw-found-fixing-its-own-findings-on-syria/