Your source says the same thing as I said- that "Palestine" is a Latin word that was formed because of the existance of the Philistines. The one inscription at Medinet Habu from circa 1170 BC has nothing to do with "Palestine" nor "Palestinians". This inscription wa found in a temple which was dedicated the second Ramses. This inscription talks about the Sea people such as the Sherden, Peleset, Denyen, Shekelesh. To remaind you that Philistines were existed in Egypt at the time of the 13th century BC. Therefore, are you saying that the Philistines (Pleset) are the "Palestinians"? According to the Padiist's statue is not from 850-900 BC, but the statuewas found by Germen Archeaologists that found it by University of Leipzig. The statue is from the 13h century and it is the statue of Ramses. at the same place was found as well the statue of Ramses's grandson, Sethi. Therefore, "Padiist's statue" has nothing to do with "Palestinians" not "Palestine". According to the Assyrian inscriptions, in Assyria there was a king names "Tiglath Pileser" (has nothing to do with "Palestinians" not "Palestine").
It is relevent. If the Arabs themselves dont know what is "Palestine", then how they can demend to claim such place that is unknown to them?
Flights to Jordanian Palestine. Flights to Jordan Palestine - satisfy your curiosity. Discover a bustling capital in Ramallh, desert landscapes in Wadi Rum and stunning Petra.
