Discussion in 'United States' started by MolonLabe2009, Nov 20, 2019.
You evidently don't know what a quid pro quo is.
I asked you to dunk things. You claimed something.... not sourcing anything. lol
You evidently don't know what debunking is.
Nothing to debunk other than your invented quid pro quo.
I dunno what you're talking about. Trump directly asked for favors. He withheld the aid.
You claim it can not be a quid pro quo since "Ukraine would have to be aware"... hinting they weren't....
but you prove nothing. So you got nothing.
One needs a quo for a quid for a quid pro quo to be evident. Not evident so...
We got the transcripts of Trump asking a favor. We know he withheld the money.
Testimonies with oath's saying how it is exactly that.
That's the evidence. So I dunno what you're talking about that there is none.
Do you know what quid quo pro means?
I do. I don't know what you're talking about that there is no evidence.
You're not elaborating, or debunking.
Thanks for proving my point. One has to know there is a quid pro quo to have a quid pro quo but I guess that is beyond your capability to understand.
Who says the Ukrainians did not know there was a quid pro quo?
Ukrainians for one.
Not seeing a source.
You never will if you don’t look or are you one of those that’s gets their news from late night comedians?
I mean a simple Google search can debunk all your BS talking points.
You claimed it. Not seeing a source.
In fact. Your fake news has been debunked.
Kurt Volker, the former US special envoy to Ukraine, also admitted that the country would have known military aid was being withheld as the Trump administration pushed for an investigation into the Bidens.
You're free to have your silly opinion. But it's not founded on anything so far.
This is if Ukraine knew the were being extorted. And your sources aren't about it as far as I could see. While Poroshenko words aren't said under oath. So.. /care.
Sure, sure, he only came to that conclusion from listening to one sided testimony in the impeachment hearing. And he considers the charges against Biden is a conspiracy theory. Well, I guess we know what camp he is in.
So the Ukrainian presidents words mean nothing because they aren't under oath?
while Americans under oath say something different.
American's under oath did nothing but give their opinions or talk about their hurt feelings.
Trump was quiet clear that he wanted a favor from Ukraine / looking into the Biden. We got the transcript.
And the Transcript of the call from the Dotard. There aren't testimonies under oath saying something else as far as I know. Must hurt your feelings.
I have a copy of the transcript right on my desktop, nothing wrong. See, opinions are like @SSholes, we all have one.
Separate names with a comma.