Pfauci Follies

Mindless fools are the ones who see things that aren't there.

Where's the "corruption"? Be specific and be accurate. *LOL*

 

No, they were shut down because they could provide no research for their claims.
If some paleontologists were having a discussion about T-Rex’s and someone joined the conversation saying he had a theory that T-Rex’s were about 7 feet tall, purple and sang songs do they have to “have a debate with him”?

 

So where were all the open debates/discussions among all peers? There were definitely two camps, for and against the official narratives. Those against were silenced, there was plenty there. Do you think because CNN didn't air any story about it, it didn't exist, hey, is that your perspective?

CDC, FDA & Pfauci are corrupt to the core.

 

Now now. We have a lot of preeminent scientists on this forum, including @UntilNextTime!

 

*LOL*

 

There are two camps in my example. Those paleontologists who believe T-Rex was about 12 feet tall and an apex predator and the guy who believes they looked like Barney. Should CNN air a serious science story about the guy who thinks a T-Rex looked like Barney?

 

No, just people who can see through bullshit.

 

Good comeback, not.

 

If you don’t know the science the odds are much greater you’ll be fooled by the bullshit.

And from the posts of yours that I’ve seen I can very confidently state you don’t know the science.

You take unrelated or (often) incorrect information and then build wild narratives that have no basis in reality and use that instead of actually trying to understand the science. I bet there is also a smidgen of “I can’t admit I was wrong” thrown in there too.

 

You are completely describing yourself, once again.

 

No "comeback" was necessary, my unlearned chum.

 

So you'd jump off a 200ft cliff like a lemming if a bureaucrat told you to because it will save your life?

 

A response that amounts to “I’m rubber, you’re glue. What you say bounces off me and sticks to you”

Not exactly the well thought out response this topic requires.

 

No, I’m not the one who is taking the advice of debunked sources.

 

IMO the mindless fools are those who always believe the claims and statements of known liars.

 

Show
Me
The
Corruption

 

You've
Already
Been
Shown

 

The only thing I've been "shown" is your claims of corruption backed up by silly websites.

 

Great odds of surviving the lies and fear-mongering, makes you wonder about the lengths people go to, to get 'saved' by something that has an average of 1.1112125 % chance of 'getting' you seems crazy to have yourself injected with a concoction that does more harm than good

 

For all those who believe the lies...

https://community.covidvaccineinjur...wed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/

 

Ok, a website that lists 1,000 medical papers of "covid vaccine injuries". So what?

For example from the very first link of this list (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601) there is a paper discussing the diagnosis of Myocarditis in 23 men after being vaccinated with a MRNA vaccine. This is against the backdrop of 2.8 MILLION doses being administered. As the conclusion of the paper states, "Vigilance for rare adverse events, including myocarditis, after COVID-19 vaccination is warranted but should not diminish overall confidence in vaccination during the current pandemic."

Link #2? It goes to the very same paper as link #1. So listing it as 1,000 papers is a bit of a misnomer if multiple links are going to go to the same paper.

Link#3? 15 patients between the ages of 12-18 showed signs of Myocarditis after receiving a MRNA vaccine. (Again, against how many MILLIONS of doses?) Let's let the paper speak for itself. "At follow-up 1 to 13 days after hospital discharge, 11 patients (73%) had resolution of symptoms." IOW, about 75% of the subjects were perfectly fine up to two weeks after hospitalization. The findings? "In this small case series study, myocarditis was diagnosed in children after COVID-19 vaccination, most commonly in boys after the second dose. In this case series, in short-term follow-up, patients were mildly affected."

Do you really need me to follow up on all 1,000 links?

You really should be doing this research yourself before presenting this as some kind of indication of serious issues with the COVID vaccines because, as we can plainly see here, it's not even close to the case.

 

~ Sadly this entire Covid19 fiasco has been a living example of psychological manipulation /social conditioning .

 

I absolutely agree, although I'm positive we disagree over who is being manipulated.

 

I'm bored so lets examine some more.

Link #43 under Myocarditis. A study about ONE man diagnosed with Myocarditis after his second MRNA shot? Final result? "Follow-up at 1 month confirmed complete symptomatic recovery and echocardiogram demonstrated normalization of cardiac function."

After one month of being diagnosed, no issues.


Link #153 under Myocarditis. It is a review of 29 cases of reported Myocarditis after a COVID vaccine. I didn't bother to trace down the cases. Bottom line what is the conclusion? "The bottom line is that the risk of cardiac complications among children and adults due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection far exceeds the minimal and rare risks of vaccination-related transient myocardial or pericardial inflammation."

Let's move to the next category: Thrombosis

All of the cases of Thrombosis have been associated with the Astra Zeneca vaccine. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have no such issues.