Please cite your best evidence of "no-planes"

Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Dec 11, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's assuming all the parts were going in the same trajectory after the plane hit
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Only two?...and you think two trumps the thousands who saw the plane hit with their own eyes?


    You're a joke.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    the thousands that you cannot "prove" even one! LOL
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    no you wouldnt! what a pile of manure!

    you have been asked time and time again to produce bonafide witness statements and all we get from you and your ilk is more bull(*)(*)(*)(*) font ink.

    you think you are the only one who lost friends there

    More bs, looking is meaningless when thats where it ends, then going right back to singing dablunder web site mantra and pretending never saw a thing.

    So please spare us the posturing and plea to emotions and stick to the facts.
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That's correct. Because the ball was filmed by the media at least four times. The truth doesn't need one eyewitness because the films prove that something other than a plane was accurately filmed by the media.
     
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There was NO 'ball' filmed by the media...It's purely your bad eyesight that maked the plane appear that way on the poor resolution clips you provide
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    why would you blame truthers for providing poor resolution clips that THE NEWS MEDIA PROVIDED?

    What kind of scam is that?
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,469
    Likes Received:
    20,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The media provided video that some truther wad made into a poor grainy gif, you know, from those videos you refuse to watch.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    well then show us the pristine originals! LOL

    Ill wait right here!

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    oh and btw I did watch your videos and the gifs are equally as good as the originals that the media supplied.

    If you think they arent by all means feel free to prove it.

    [​IMG]

    Ha! you can even see the transparency overlay like the hezerkhani fake LOL
     
  11. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,469
    Likes Received:
    20,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Doesn't matter how much I post of the original live videos, you will still claim the substandard gifs as the "originals".

    - - - Updated - - -

    LOL, dude, you are something, but not something smart.
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can't even see the windows of the tower in that crappy GIF...how would anyone see a hole?
     
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,469
    Likes Received:
    20,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, "huh, no windows", or "huh, no columns". LOL
     
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yeh too bad its a foia release and the same quality as the original video suck it up and deal with it.

    same (*)(*)(*)(*) you showed on tv to claim a plane hit, so SUCK IT UP!

    If it was good enough to show a plane hit its good enough to show it did not!

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    cant see the streaks in the paint either.

    Oh and why did it blow out the side with so many explosions, the most resistance instead of the hole it supposedly made?

    I mean here is this BIG GAPING HOLE and it blows the side out instead!

    WTF is up with that anyway? That as crazy as a building falling into the path of most resistance.

    Oh wait they did that too. I forgot. I hope you can explain all that magic for us.
     
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,469
    Likes Received:
    20,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, again, it is not my problem you have no understanding of physics.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'straight down' is the 'path of most resistance' now?

    Ol' 'electricity isn't energy' koko gets nuttier every day..
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Nope its the path of LEAST RESISTANCE IN A DEMOLITION!!!!

    But I am sure OSHugging debunker fizixists will continue to try and prove newton wrong.

    Oh yeh and that electricity statement was correct, and I love the way you continually mock it proving your ignorance. and spare me the high school dictionary definition.
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There you have it...the rest of the world thinks electricity is a form of energy,but koko says it's not...he's painted himself in that corner and refuses to budge.

    Is it any wonder we think he's full of beans when he posts his truther BS?

    Can anyone take him seriously when he claims there were no planes on 9/11?
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,783
    Likes Received:
    362
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you got it!

    electricity is not energy DUH!

    and I claim YOU CANT PROVE THERE WERE PLANES ON 911, all the videos are CGI

    stop misrepresenting my position.

    >>>Flamebait Removed<<<
     
  21. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    "Ya, but I don't think it was a plane." This was in response to someone on the roof, regarding the second tower, the one he witnessed.

    "No, because it happened like 20 minutes later." He's telling them that the second tower exploded 20 minutes after the first tower.

    "I think it was a bomb on the second building." He couldn't be more clear.

    "I think they had that bomb in there" (THE SECOND TOWER, the one he witnessed and recorded) and they were like alright let's maximize it. Hit it with a plane, and then hit the bomb." He's saying that he thinks they thought to hit the first tower with a plane and bomb the second one. At no time does he describe seeing a plane, that's a fact.

    "Ya, the second one I'm tellin' ya..was...I didn't see a plane...I was watching it...I didn't see a plane." He didn't see a plane because he was watching it. Just imagine trying to refute this evidence. It's unassailable.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_bttrlyx4k
     
  22. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,048
    Likes Received:
    9,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ALL the videos are CGI?

    prove it.
     
  23. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where are the complaints or comments from anyone who took a video or photo....that their video or photo has been altered with the addition of a plane?
     
  24. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,469
    Likes Received:
    20,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know that you only seem to be able to pay attention to pictures so here you go.

    [​IMG]

    - - - Updated - - -

    So if someone says they "think" the moon is made of green cheese you would believe it?
     
  25. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He can't, he didn't and he won't. All he does is, latch onto some blurry video and then demand everyone prove his claim wrong. He dishonestly attempts to switch the burden of proof because he knows he is unable to his claims. His use of the Ace Baker "nose-in, nose-out" CGI claim only proves this. He dishonestly ignores the FACT this claim has been completely debunked.

    Furthermore, he is unable to explain how the hole left by his "explosions" cause debris on the outside of the building to be bent inward. There is only ONE explanation for that. He is just too dishonest to admit that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page