Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Dec 11, 2013.
That's assuming all the parts were going in the same trajectory after the plane hit
Only two?...and you think two trumps the thousands who saw the plane hit with their own eyes?
You're a joke.
the thousands that you cannot "prove" even one! LOL
no you wouldnt! what a pile of manure!
you have been asked time and time again to produce bonafide witness statements and all we get from you and your ilk is more bull(*)(*)(*)(*) font ink.
you think you are the only one who lost friends there
More bs, looking is meaningless when thats where it ends, then going right back to singing dablunder web site mantra and pretending never saw a thing.
So please spare us the posturing and plea to emotions and stick to the facts.
That's correct. Because the ball was filmed by the media at least four times. The truth doesn't need one eyewitness because the films prove that something other than a plane was accurately filmed by the media.
There was NO 'ball' filmed by the media...It's purely your bad eyesight that maked the plane appear that way on the poor resolution clips you provide
why would you blame truthers for providing poor resolution clips that THE NEWS MEDIA PROVIDED?
What kind of scam is that?
The media provided video that some truther wad made into a poor grainy gif, you know, from those videos you refuse to watch.
well then show us the pristine originals! LOL
Ill wait right here!
oh and btw I did watch your videos and the gifs are equally as good as the originals that the media supplied.
If you think they arent by all means feel free to prove it.
Ha! you can even see the transparency overlay like the hezerkhani fake LOL
Doesn't matter how much I post of the original live videos, you will still claim the substandard gifs as the "originals".
- - - Updated - - -
LOL, dude, you are something, but not something smart.
Can't even see the windows of the tower in that crappy GIF...how would anyone see a hole?
Yeah, "huh, no windows", or "huh, no columns". LOL
Yeh too bad its a foia release and the same quality as the original video suck it up and deal with it.
same (*)(*)(*)(*) you showed on tv to claim a plane hit, so SUCK IT UP!
If it was good enough to show a plane hit its good enough to show it did not!
cant see the streaks in the paint either.
Oh and why did it blow out the side with so many explosions, the most resistance instead of the hole it supposedly made?
I mean here is this BIG GAPING HOLE and it blows the side out instead!
WTF is up with that anyway? That as crazy as a building falling into the path of most resistance.
Oh wait they did that too. I forgot. I hope you can explain all that magic for us.
LOL, again, it is not my problem you have no understanding of physics.
'straight down' is the 'path of most resistance' now?
Ol' 'electricity isn't energy' koko gets nuttier every day..
Nope its the path of LEAST RESISTANCE IN A DEMOLITION!!!!
But I am sure OSHugging debunker fizixists will continue to try and prove newton wrong.
Oh yeh and that electricity statement was correct, and I love the way you continually mock it proving your ignorance. and spare me the high school dictionary definition.
There you have it...the rest of the world thinks electricity is a form of energy,but koko says it's not...he's painted himself in that corner and refuses to budge.
Is it any wonder we think he's full of beans when he posts his truther BS?
Can anyone take him seriously when he claims there were no planes on 9/11?
you got it!
electricity is not energy DUH!
and I claim YOU CANT PROVE THERE WERE PLANES ON 911, all the videos are CGI
stop misrepresenting my position.
"Ya, but I don't think it was a plane." This was in response to someone on the roof, regarding the second tower, the one he witnessed.
"No, because it happened like 20 minutes later." He's telling them that the second tower exploded 20 minutes after the first tower.
"I think it was a bomb on the second building." He couldn't be more clear.
"I think they had that bomb in there" (THE SECOND TOWER, the one he witnessed and recorded) and they were like alright let's maximize it. Hit it with a plane, and then hit the bomb." He's saying that he thinks they thought to hit the first tower with a plane and bomb the second one. At no time does he describe seeing a plane, that's a fact.
"Ya, the second one I'm tellin' ya..was...I didn't see a plane...I was watching it...I didn't see a plane." He didn't see a plane because he was watching it. Just imagine trying to refute this evidence. It's unassailable.
ALL the videos are CGI?
Where are the complaints or comments from anyone who took a video or photo....that their video or photo has been altered with the addition of a plane?
I know that you only seem to be able to pay attention to pictures so here you go.
- - - Updated - - -
So if someone says they "think" the moon is made of green cheese you would believe it?
He can't, he didn't and he won't. All he does is, latch onto some blurry video and then demand everyone prove his claim wrong. He dishonestly attempts to switch the burden of proof because he knows he is unable to his claims. His use of the Ace Baker "nose-in, nose-out" CGI claim only proves this. He dishonestly ignores the FACT this claim has been completely debunked.
Furthermore, he is unable to explain how the hole left by his "explosions" cause debris on the outside of the building to be bent inward. There is only ONE explanation for that. He is just too dishonest to admit that.
Separate names with a comma.