Please cite your best evidence of "no-planes"

Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Dec 11, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    they usually only eliminate people with first hand knowledge or professional in an industry that can tear them apart in court like the demolition expert danny jowenko just happened to hit a rtee with his car after saying that wtc7 was a demolition without any doubt.
     
  2. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    1,036
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Isn't he the guy that said that there's no way that 1 and 2 could have been a demolition? Maybe truthers killed him for disagreeing with them.
     
  3. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://911research.com/disinfo/index.html

     
  4. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Yes, because I have the advantage of knowing what was recorded live. He was confused about the ball and mistook it for a chopper. "I swear" was his way of questioning whether it was really a chopper.

    "There was a police copter like near it...I swear, I don't know what happen to him, but. But when the second one exploded there was a helicopter not too far away."
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    1,036
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what happens when you end up having to argue with your witness regarding what your witness says he saw?
     
  7. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.truthmove.org/content/disinformation/
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.truthmove.org/content/disinformation/

    I guess there are people in the world who are stupid enough to believe nonsense like this.

    There are others who believe the official 9/11 story as spoon fed to them by the Kosher press too. But in their case many of them have the legitimate excuse that they suffer from a LACK of information, not DISinformation.

    That is through no fault of their own. The complicity of the main stream media in the cover up is to blame for that.
    And I DO blame them. Call it anti-semitism if you want. I'd just as soon call them a pack of liars as a bunch of Jews. But ignoring the SOCIO-POLITICAL RELIGIOUS aspect of their identity only serves to further obscure their motives and their long range agenda. For they are not doing all this things for no reason at all.
    The public needs to know what they are up to before they sign themselves into slavery by default.
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  11. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.truthmove.org/content/disinformation/

    I guess there are people in the world who are stupid enough to believe nonsense like this.

    There are others who believe the official 9/11 story as spoon fed to them by the Kosher press too. But in their case many of them have the legitimate excuse that they suffer from a LACK of information, not DISinformation.

    That is through no fault of their own. The complicity of the main stream media in the cover up is to blame for that.
    And I DO blame them. Call it anti-semitism if you want. I'd just as soon call them a pack of liars as a bunch of Jews. But ignoring the SOCIO-POLITICAL RELIGIOUS aspect of their identity only serves to further obscure their motives and their long range agenda. For they are not doing all this things for no reason at all.
    The public needs to know what they are up to before they sign themselves into slavery by default.
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll: because Jews,part 10
     
  13. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The actual truth is fantastic enough without any embellishment.

    For some reason it is easy to get people to believe that a handful of Arabs could penetrate US intelligence and NORAD and then fly around for an hour without being intercepted, but it's almost impossible to get them to realize that the Israeli MOSSAD is even more capable of performing the same feat, which they are.

    They have "Dual citizens" in the highest places of US govt, intelligence, and everywhere else. Plus they have literally hundreds of thousands of Jewish Sayinim who were born and raised in the US who would be more than happy to lend a hand in the plot.

    Non-Jews have been accused of "anti-semitism", but if this were actually true, then the majority of them would realize the truth of what I am saying. Yet they remain complacently oblivious to the presence of people whom they call neighbors who are all looking forward to a Mashianic Age in which they will become the favored ruling class. They practically are already, while all the so called bigots can't even tell them from Adam.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Have you always been this lazy, or is this just your way of avoiding being made to look bad?
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I don't know how he'd reconcile what he didn't see with what he did, and don't really care. He's not a witness that needs to be re-interviewed. Only two eyewitnesses need to be questioned again for my simple research.
     
  15. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    1,036
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don't care what your witness has to say?
     
  16. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I certainly care about what he said when he was standing there filming and providing an accurate account of what was really there and what wasn't, a plane of any kind.
     
  17. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And the people who were watching nearby, their voices can heard on the video, they can be heard saying it was a plane...were they pre-planted there to pressure him to change his "it was an explosion" claim.

    Time to replace the gerbil in your wheel.
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is true. Frightening list of people of had 'accidents' running their mouths about 9/11 early on. Now, they mostly just run interference (like in here). They create doubt, pick holes, and generally obstruct any useful dialogue, and people are mostly lazy and often stupid so, much easier than it first was.
     
  19. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ...and of course, it just serves your purpose, without any proof....these people were all taken out by the government.

    No they serve as a "squirrel!" for those who lack actual critical thinking skills.
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's NOT true,sigmund...you made that all up
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    anyone capable and "willing" to contradict the official lie in court is dead!

    why do you protect these criminal elements?
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    one only needs a simpleton 101 education in physics to the official lies.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83

    nope, he said 7 was a demolition. if 7 was a demolition guess what, so was 1,2,3,4,5, and 6
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    watch it or I will repost your dodging your failed posterizing claim. LOL
     
  25. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    1,036
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [video=youtube;RrJH8nLO8kc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrJH8nLO8kc[/video]

    Once again, Koko is wrong.

    Jowenko: "[The plane] crashed in a more favorable spot, a bit more in the center. Plus the building's own weight on top..."

    Interviewer: "So it's logical the second [building collapsed] first."

    Jowenko: " Of course. You clearly see the building that was hit first was hit higher, so it went last because there was less weight to bring it down. That's essential knowledge for anyone that knows anything about demolition. You have to use the building's own weight"

    Interviewer: "If it was done with explosives it would have collapsed from below"

    Jowenko: "You'd place the explosives below, of course."

    Interviewer: "And it would have started underneath"

    Jowenko: "Yes, that's how you get the full weight"

    Jowenko: "It collapsed at the exact location the plane hit and heated it"


    So once again, maybe someone like koko made Danny's death look like an accident. He clearly didn't tow the truther line.

    More projection from the book of falsehood that is koko's argument. You got wrecked in your little display of technological ignorance. By all means. keep reposting the proof that you have no idea what you are talking about.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page