Police Execution Squads, the Tyrannical Government that Supports them.

Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 21, 2017.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    after seeing what they did with the innocent people of waco, by compounding violations of the constitution and bring in a tank. We can wipe our asses with the constitution thats all its worth as its thrown out every time we need it.

    They have no regard for the constitution what so ever.
     
  2. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It was dark, the guy committed violent felonies in his past, he was running from police, and he was pointing an object in a classic shooting stance. You tell me why the officers shouldn't assume it was a firearm.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats the problem. ASSume.

    when you ASSume you justify taking an innocent life without a trial. There is no law that says Rambo has to open fire and cant just back off and give it a 10 minute rest instead of wasting these kids.

    Its easy for you to scream see he was a criminal after the fact, well rambo had no way to know that at the time. You are justifying violations of the constitution and even more kleptocratic corruption.

    Because it wasnt a firearm, hows that for a start.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2018
  4. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Irrelevant. You treat something as a firearm, like pointing it in a shooting stance, expect to be treated like you have a firearm. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. This isn't a violation of the constitution.
     
  5. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh...do the new driverless cars evade policein high speed chases now? Lefties gonna lefty.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    its 100% relevant.
    the kid most likely hit video and was holding it up to video them, you certainly draw a lot of assumptions with no evidence what so ever to support it, I can do the same. Shot for innocent video taping, feel free to provide evidence to the contrary if you wish.
    Pointing at a cop is not a constitutional violation, shooting an unarmed kid because he was pointing is a constitutional violation and everything this country is 'alleged' to stand for.
     
  7. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Skip to the 27 minute mark on this one.





    And here's a couple of videos completely dedicated to it.





    What evidence do you have that he was video taping? Why was he video taping?

    Prove it. Prove pointing an object deliberately in a threatening manner is protected by the constitution.
     
  8. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    OK. So let's suspend the 2d Amendment until that happens.

    Deal?
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Prove it was a threatening manner, in this case you have no evidence what so ever he pointed any thing at all. Your video shows nothing for all we know he had his hands in his pockets. Are you that naive that you would think the cops dont talk **** to make a record to protect their asses if something goes wrong. get real. Burden of proof that he pointed something is on you since you are supporting the murder.

    Yeh that kid was so dangerous that the second cop had to empty the whole ****ing clip in to him after he was shot to **** and already on the ground.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2018
  10. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. The purpose of the 2nd is a reminder to government that if they turn tyrannical, they would have to deal with an armed populace.
     
  11. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You didn't watched the videos.
     
  12. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    government has done so - see OP
     
  13. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's not a clear case of tyranny and in fact arguably justifiable.
     
  14. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Nazis claimed they did not engage in tyranny and said their actions were justified, God ordained, and for the good of humanity. Same difference.
     
  15. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hardly.

    I have posted many times about cops murdering innocent people.

    And not even cases where there was a possible excuse, such as the murder by cop of 7 year old Aiyana Jones, shot in the head while she was sleeping on the sofa, shot by a cop during a late night no knock raid - to the wrong address.

    And the killer cop first blamed the childs grandmother (can you believe that?) until the film crew spoke up (they were there filming for the tv show 48 Hours). But then the state attorney charged the shows producer with interference and tampering - cops hate to have their lies exposed.

    Cops are not your friend, and they are not there to protect and to serve.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2018
  16. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    that's good to know - mind you I wrote the lack of en masse 2d Amendment supporters

    ONE supporter does not mean ''en masse'' - the fact that only one such person has this type of integrity clearly demonstrates that the majority of right wingers here lack that integrity and principle ~ mind you, this forum is 90% right wing which shows there a lot of people who fall into this category
     
  17. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not the only one, there are others in the forum. Remember the main purpose of the founders supporting an armed population - being able to oppose a tyrannical government. Conservatives and particularly libertarians are skeptical of government, and as law enforcement is the means by which the govt forces people to obey, many of us are not fans of law enforcement.

    Thee is also another aspect to consider. The "right" has a lot of pro-law enforcement people not because pro-LE is fundamental to current conservatism, but because the only political party that grass roots LE supporters can join is the Republican party. "progressives" hate cops, they rail daily about cops abusing minorities, the progs headline front groups (BLM, Occupy, antifa) are clearly violent against all LE.

    In the forum, many of the vocal supporters of LE are current or former LE themselves.
     
  18. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    Proof, please.

    I with your claim that progressives rail against cops but that is because of their selective enforcement of the law, abuses such as beatings, their willingness and eagerness to frame innocent blacks for crimes they did not commit such as in the Wilding case, their use of agent provocateurs to foment violence such as in Ferguson, the endless violence and crimes of a criminally racist punk such as Mark Fuhrman and the many cover ups used by is henchmen in the LA police department, their conspiratorial crimes such as: https://www.google.com/search?q=phi....69i57j0l5.12230j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    (see also the book Busted - https://www.npr.org/2014/07/10/3304...line-between-good-and-bad-philadelphia-police)



    But their campaigns against these police criminals do not constitute hate. If they did, then failure to condemn those crimes such as in the failure of right wingers to do so constitutes hatred against innocent minority victims of those police crimes.

    So where's your proof, please.
     
  19. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113

    BLM, antifa, Occupy. Look them up.
     
  20. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    that's proof of your hate and does not prove your claim
     
  21. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Man falsely convicted of killing 2 cops is freed after 36 years in prison
    Source: UPI


    By Ray Downs | June 24, 2018 at 9:30 PM

    June 24 (UPI) -- A Chicago man has been freed after 36 years in prison for the murder of two police officers after a judge ruled police tortured him to get a confession.

    Jackie Wilson, 57, walked out of the Cook County Jail on Friday after Cook County Circuit Judge William Hooks threw out his conviction for the murders of Chicago police officers Richard O'Brien and William Fahey in 1982. Hooks said police tortured Wilson to get the confession and prosecutors "utterly failed" to make a convincing argument to keep Wilson locked up as he awaits a new trial.

    "[I'm] happy to be a member of society again after 36 years of incarceration for a crime I didn't commit," Wilson told reporters shortly after he was released. "It's been a rocky ride. I'd just like to move forward with my life barring any further complications and I'd like to make my contribution to society."

    Wilson was one of several young black people who were allegedly tortured by ex-Chicago police Cmdr. Jon Burge and detectives under his command during the 70s and 80s at Chicago's South Side Police Station. The scandal has resulted in at least $115 million in settlement payouts and at least one false conviction.

    Read more: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/06/24/3191529888301/


    [​IMG]

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jtZM_i2fS...5BAgdOfzptc/s1600/Sun-Times+cover+6-29-10.jpg

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rToabVydLgM/Ul7-Z8Qtj4I/AAAAAAAASeI/K5SV1qp1G0s/s1600/jon+burge+1.png
    9






    Criminal cops and prosecutors again proven to be hate filled filled racists. Then, taxpayers are forced to pay for their crimes while the real criminals in the government laugh all the way to the bank as they cash in their fat pensions.

    so where are the forum right wingers to protest rather than to applaud the criminal cops???
     
  22. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113

    So you reject facts for personal attacks. Don't blame me for your bias and for "progressives" hatred of cops.
     
  23. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    still waiting for proof of your alleged 'facts'
     
  24. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Look up BLM, antifa, Occupy. Its not as if you have never heard of them.
     
  25. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    antifa is not progressive but anarchist

    BLM and Occupy are peaceful but their rallies were disrupted by police violence and agent provocateurs as shown in the videos we patriots posted.

    Thus, still waiting for your "proof".
     

Share This Page