three and a half million Americans died in Vietnam? ... it's staggering that the Govt could hide those numbers ...
Some estimates are over 1.2 million including civilian (not American) deaths. Other estimates go over 3 million going back to 1955.
I posted what the available numbers were from research, that's all. If I wanted to "condemn" a poster I would do so, I don't need your prodding. In any case, Vietnam was a US government atrocity (what else is new?), the correct number of casualties is irrelevant, it doesn't make it any more or any less a war crime based on a number. I'm much more inclined to condemn those who defend US government crimes 24/7 and never question them than those who expose them. If my "slip is showing" for that then so be it.
Yes. The important point is lots of people died in Vietnam and LBJ's enthusiasm for the military quagmire was a principle reason why. If people want to quibble with the number I chose to cite that's fine by me.
The only ones who want to make it an issue are the same ones who defend every US government atrocity 24/7 and never question them. What a surprise.
They argue over how the deck chairs were arranged on the Titanic and ignore the iceberg ripping her underside apart. They really know how to focus on the important things.
3 shots in six seconds, with a bolt action poor rifle, through trees at a moving target with accuracy..impossible.....try your fallacious theory again.
I stated fact not theory. HE was NOT aiming or shooting through tree's. It is long since proven beyond question that six seconds is indeed adequate time to shoot 3 aimed and accurate shots with that rifle. That is absolute fact. Your denial of that fact proves only that you are massively ignorant of rifles and shooting. Moving targets are irrelevant. Some moving targets are harder to hit than others, some are quite easy to hit. In this case the movement was almost directly away from Oswald which means that the target would not have appeared to be moving at all. Yes sir it is proven by EVIDENCE that he fired 3 shots in six seconds or more with a bolt action rifle and hit twice. You can provide no evidence to the contrary. Embracing stupid theory does not make you better informed or educated. But you believe you are despite the fact that you know nothing about the assassination.
I could not have said it any better myself. I see that the poll is closed,i would not have voted for any of the three because they are ALL wrong.I am dissapointed that the OP did not include the correct choice that Oswald was innocent,the patsy he said he was with multiple shooters pulling it off.hard to believe the OP did not think of that one. the correct one.
that is why we have not heard back from him since then because he knows he has been taken to school by you and unlike someone else who trolls here night and say 24/7 talking to himself trying to convince people of his lies that oswald,he is not a paid shill like him,so he has not come back because he wont come back for ass beatings for FREE like that paid shill does here all the time.THAT poster gets paid for it,he doesnt for his arse beating he just got from you so he wont be back.lol
Of course the poll was biased and rigged. There should have at least been an "Other" selection if it had minimal honesty.
You are the only one taking arse beatings which is proven by your childish postings. The people you defend are the ones with no evidence
Despite the fact that he can offer no evidence for any other explanation concerning JFK or 911 and neither can you
You need a fourth choice which is the only choice in reality .LEE HARVEY OSWALD NEVER FIRED A SHOT AT J.F.K. He was in the break room when it went down which was verified by witnesses !
Lots of evidence, but you are too blind and/or dumb to see it....brainwashed by the government and their coverup...if ignorance is bliss, you must be a very happy person...lol
I agree. The mafia killed JFK. Joe had lots of mob ties from his rum running days and the mob figured his kid would turn a blind eye. When bobby started making life tough, something had to be done. And a headshot on a moving target with a carcano? Yeah right! Oswald was a patsy. The mob killed him too.
There are moving targets and MOVING targets not all moving targets are the same. In the case of a head shot from the sixth floor of the depository the target was very close to the window. It was moving VERY slowly and the aspect would made the target appear to be moving almost DIRECTLY away from the shooter. This means the movement would have been negligible. It would have been any easy shot with the carcano for any US Marine or soldier or even the average deer hunter. Despite the fact that is true Joe had dealings with organized crime the evidence simply does not show any involvement with anyone except Oswald. Ruby killed Oswald and again he acted alone
No you are wrong and you know it. There is no evidence of a conspiracy and that is fact you cannot refute. if there were such evidence you would have posted it by now. Your only argument is " the government lies, the government lies, the government lies ". That is not a valid argument nor is it evidence. The evidence proves you wrong
I am familiar with what we were told went down, I don't buy it. Having our president taken out by the mob wouldn't sit well with the country. A lone gunman is easier to accept. Oswald even had mobsters in his family, an uncle I believe. Oswald being an outspoken FPCC sympathetic completes the narrative. I also don't buy that ruby wasn't mob or didn't have ties to the mob. It is also purported that Hoffa called his attorney and said "(they) killed the SOB". And also purported that bobby said "I figured (they) would get one of us but I thought it would have been me".
