Got to feel for the poor Koalas. It's making the news over here. People might have to wonder why it's so bad this early in the season and it would mess with their cognitive dissonance over global warming if they did. Best to just stick your head in the sand and ignore it.
I won't be surprised if Prince Andrew is kicked out of the Royal Family for good, or disowned whichever comes first.
Charles has already said that he will slim line the Monarchy after he becomes King. It was, supposedly, to sub cash to help with Fergie's debt that Andrew was at Epstein's for those four days wasn't it? And she lives, with him at Windsor still, Andrew not the 'dead' one. £1/2 million per yr is not a lot of money to live the life style of a Prince - they both loved the money they they have not got = He had the title, those they hung with had the cash. It isn't the first time that Royalty has flirted with glamour or the wealthy.
Allegedly. Yes, this is true unwittingly, the foolish, Prince Andrew has brought, back to life, a story many hoped and others feared was dead. It is all about money from now on in ..............
I was going to link to it on another forum to counter one of the posters who thinks Charles is a gutless softie.
He is the second son of the Monarch and thus a Prince - not a lot can be done about that. He will not be seen 'around much anymore' though - that is for sure - he'll be tucked quietly away some where out of the public eye. Such folly on his part ---- no-one can really make sense of how he was allowed to agree to Maitlis's third degree - it was and is bizarre.
Andrew is worth over £50 million. Nobody is quite sure how. There's more scandal to come out yet. The newspapers are all united in their distaste for him. He took a real kicking on tonight's satirical political panel show ''Have I Got News For You''.
The Queen can remove all of his titles including Prince if she so desires. I'm not saying that it's likely but it is possible. Maitlis wasn't even that hard on him, wait until he's before the FBI giving evidence under oath...
Trial by press which the public are less and less impressed with - 'Have I got News for You'? Honestly ............ 1960s left wing satire is no longer amusing -
For what? For what? That a woman and her lawyer, in the US, have made allegations of sexual encounters from over 20 yrs ago and that Andrew's compulsion to defend himself in public did not go down to well? Allegations being of something which is not a crime in Britain which Andrew denies. We are still living under common law, we are not yet under EU coded law. Innocence is still presumed, or is it? That Prince Andrew is not the most endearing of men does not make him guilty of any crime. . Maitlis, like all of the blatantly bias BBC female 'interviewers' now, is just pure nastiness - cold, unintelligent and needlessly aggressive asking the same questions over and over and really never getting anything out of their prey - she did at least allow him to answer her questions without talking over him, I will say that. IF the FBI did ask to question Andrew, his lawyers would be present and I should imagine that any interview would be arranged here in Eng. I cannot imagine that the US authorities would want to humiliate the British nation over this but at the moment it is an ambulance chasing lawyer demanding he should, not the FBI. Money - that is all this is about now - money. Are 'they' trying to blackmail our Royal family? Yes .... ,
Who knows these rich elites never have consequences. Take the clintons or the bidens for instance . Nothing ever happens for them mutilating the system , the make billions on the taxpayers dime , them their families and anyone that keeps them in power .
You got that right. The political elite do and take whateve they want , if nothing happens to a one of them after this next ( bombshell ) ig report comes out then im officially done .
It will slide off the page again ---- Prince Andrew was a fool, and will suffer for that personally, but in fact ''there is nothing to see here - move on''.
Wow, there's a lot of anger to unpack there. I never mentioned any crime of course but you obviously needed to use a strawman so you could rant at your pet peeves of the EU, BBC and apparently women interviewers. Of course, any investigation by the authorities in the US will determine whether any laws were broken. Still, your loyalty to the royal family and their parasitic, pedo be-friending Prince is clear to see.
Maybe he won't be seen at all. He knows to pick his women. Including a porno star at one time. The Royal Family should have known by then. I still don't want Andrew as a King, There would be too much controversy there. Too much obscenity in the family. Andrew has disgraced his family including the Royal Family. I rather have Prince Edward as King Not Andrew. and that's all I'm going to say for now!