Proof positive no plane flew over the Pentagon

Discussion in '9/11' started by Patriot911, Feb 5, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you see any insults in posts #1 or #8 here?
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/19657-we-never-went-moon.html

    Post #8 just has arguments. Every link in post #1 was about something different. It was all relevant info. Relevant info is not spam no matter how much of it there is.

    I'd been debating on these two threads for more than six months when all of my posts got deleted.
    http://www.booktalk.org/the-us-government-planned-and-carried-out-9-11-t6222.html
    http://www.booktalk.org/we-never-went-to-the-moon-t6028.html

    All I'd done was debate the way I debated on this thread.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487

    Do you see any reason to delete my posts and ban me on that thread?
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not now, but I was prevented from posting on that thread for three years. Please address my last post.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have been free to post what you will. Your posts remain, at least those where you adhere to the board's rules.

    Your whining has no basis in fact.
     
  5. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    OOOOOOOOOOOkaaaaaay......

    I really don't know what to say to this. You do know that the Apollo landing site can be seen by Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, right?

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

    Pretty much blows the Moon Hoax out of the water.
     
  6. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Like anything Scott doesn't like, he will just claim they are faked. It won't matter if other countries photograph the same thing. He will claim they are part of the cover up. Fly Scott to the moon. Show him the sites. He will STILL deny it. Some conspiracy theorists make members of the flat Earth society look reasonable.
     
  7. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well, my guess is that the moderators of Book Talk (quality books, good people, great conversation) and Sours Talk (a sports oriented forum), although they do have a political subsection, did not want to read about some ridiculous conspiracy garbage from a delusional nutcase.

    But that's just my guess. I'm betting it's pretty right on target though.
     
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pictures are fakable so pictures aren't proof of anything.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRE7grId3sI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKj5fckUX-c
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc2kijG8YdY

    They also don't make the mountain of hoax proof go away.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4001964&postcount=1

    If the evidence really shows that Apollo happened, why would they delete the arguments of the opposition? Wouldn't they want to leave them there as proof the hoax-believers were wrong? The truth is that the proof that Apollo was a hoax is so clear that sophistry is ineffective and the attempts of those pro-Apollo people to obfuscate it were having little or no effect on thinking people. You can pretend all you want but the only way you're going to sway the opinions of viewers on Apollo is to have a discussion between pro-Apollo people only with no posting or discussion of the clear proof. Once they see the proof, you've lost. There's really nothing you can do.

    Tell us why you think I was allowed to make two posts on the below thread and then was blocked from posting for fifty four pages.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/19657-we-never-went-moon.html
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh quit whining and post this garbage on the moon hoax board,where it belongs..
     
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You people brought it up first in post #21. Here it is again.
    I only wanted to talk about the censorship. I didn't intend to talk about the moon hoax evidence but you people started it in post #55.

    You seem to be trying to sweep this issue under the rug because it's an embarrassment to the pro-official version side. Censorship is only necessary when a lie is being defended. If a theory is wrong, it will fall by its own lack of merit.

    I've been censored on lots of forums. I discussed some cases here.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=54

    You people brought it up. Are you going to recognize that my posts were censored on this forum, or are you just going to tap dance around the issue?
     
  11. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You first need to prove you were actually censored. I already pointed out anomalies with your account in the moon thread. Then, of course, we have to actually take your word for it that you were trying to post, but couldn't. THEN we have to take your word for it that the intent was malicious and not something screwed up with your account. When posts are deleted, they show they were deleted, who deleted them, and usually why. Yet we don't see that with your claimed deleted posts. Just more conspiracy paranoia? No more paranoid or delusional than pretending you're being censored because "a lie is being defended". :lol: You can't even defend your own lies! Makes it rather hard to believe you as a credible poster.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have been free to post what you will. Your posts remain, at least those where you adhere to the board's rules.

    Your whining has no basis in fact.
     
  13. SpaceCricket79

    SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It didn't fly over the Pentagon, it crashed into the Pentagon - thanks for stating the obvious.
     
  14. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then, you ignored my response. I was able to make two posts (#1 and #8) before I got blocked. If the reason had been because I was new, post #8 wouldn't have appeared and I probably wouldn't have been able to start a new thread. The censorship started after it became clear that I was going to be posting clear hoax proof and asking the pro-Apollo people to analyze it. As I said before, the proof is so clear that sophistry is ineffective. They probably figured that preventing me from posting without saying so would be their best bet as it looked like I'd chickened out.

    I discussed the issue in January of 2008 at the bottom of post #1026 on this page.
    http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/51606/42/
     
  15. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If only everyone had your insight and understanding..... :lol:
     
  16. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I read your response. Like the vast majority of the crap you write, it was bull(*)(*)(*)(*). LOOK AT THE ACCOUNT INFORMATION. #1 and #8 don't show your account. They show "guest". Not only that, but the post was made in March of 2007. Your account shows it was created in August of 2008. I can't believe you're not wretching from the stench of the crap you're writing.

    That may be the way your massive ego would like it to be, but the truth is your posts show a very different story. Four years later and you STILL can't even begin to prove your claims. All you can do is whine about how you're so persecuted.

    Any dip(*)(*)(*)(*) can make that claim. Doesn't make it true, does it. Nope. :lol:

    More bull(*)(*)(*)(*) opinions from you. If they were really trying to prevent you, you wouldn't be posting here now. Yet you can't explain why you are posting here now. Oh no! Yet another direct contradiction in one of your claims! I am sure you will ignore that one as well.
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You did chicken out. You remain able to post and be seen and heard. You are not censored.

    Your arguments (all of them) carry no merit.
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I registered once. It was before I'd started the moon thread. Notice my name is there. I don't know why they put the word "Guest" by my name seeing that I'd registered. I don't know why they say I joined in 2008 as I'd registered before I started the moon thread. It looks like some kind of screw-up on the part of the people who run the site. Anyway, I couldn't keep posting after post #8.

    You ignored this. Please address it.
     
  19. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I ignored it because I don't want to go read you bragging somewhere else about yourself which is what most of your posts are all about. If you want to make a claim, post it here for everyone to read. As it stands now, it would appear I was right that there was something messed up with your account that was preventing you from posting. I guess you will just have to find some other boogieman to blame for all your failures instead of falsely accusing the admins / owners of this board from censoring you because they are obviously in on the whole moon hoax. :lol:
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You ingored it because the date of the post precedes the date that my account info says I registered.

    Look at the date of post #1026 of this page.
    http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/51606/42/

    I discussed the fact that I was being blocked at the bottom of that post.

    edit
    --------------------

    Look at my posts below that one too
     
  21. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow. You SERIOUSLY need to get better reading comprehension skills. I already brought up the fact you were obviously posting before your current account was created, thus backing up my contention there was something seriously messed up with your account. Did you actually talk to a Mod about it, or were you so happy to get attention even if it was negative that you didn't want to correct the situation.
     
  22. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
  23. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You showed what I said out-of-context to mislead the viewers. Here's the link to the post.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...lane-flew-over-pentagon-7.html#post1061508410

    That's a pretty desperate tactic and truth-seekers don't use it. Sophists use it.
     
  24. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
  25. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48

Share This Page