Proof that the Moon Mountains were Backdrops to a Movie Set/MOD WARNING

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Apr 4, 2015.

  1. stanfan

    stanfan New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    Messages:
    1,175
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yikes - this thread still continuing? What an obtuse, inaccurate poster this fake moon landing tin foil guy is. Simple fact is, and was, that the Gemini and Apollo astronauts on the way to the moon, and returning, passed through the Van Allen Radiation belts so fast, that they got a dose of radiation about as sizable as that you receive when sitting near your microwave oven cooking a tv dinner or your television. Matter of fact, the microwave oven is one of the inventions to come out of the space race, and the radiation level is considered acceptable to the general public, we are still using them. Fortysix years and counting, and hundreds of thousands of artifacts and photographs later, we still get people like this claiming they have evidence the moon landings were faked. Well - talk to the guys who went there, most of them have lived on to a ripe old age.

    Did you see the Abe Zapruder film of the JFK assassination? Believe it? Could it have been faked? There is an alleged conspiracy that has been going on longer than the moon landing - who did they bury in Arlington National Cemetery on November 25, 1963? It was a silent movie - which way did the bullet come from that struck the President, and was it even him in the motorcade? It was televised.

    Did you watch the 1980 Olympic Games in Lake Placid, an isolated community in the mountains of New York State, which, BTW, bought their optic service for television broadcasting access from the area from some kid named Mark Cuban, making his fortune, he owned all the rights. Only about 2,000 people observed the U.S. Olympic hockey team win the Gold Medal upsetting the USSR. Was televised - you believe it? Name me one or two people who were there and talked about it publicly, other than those on the ice. Was a grand victory of the Free World over the Iron Curtain during the Cold War. If it had taken place in Madison Square Garden in New York City, would you believe it actually happened?

    Did Jack Ruby really shoot Lee Harvey Oswald in the basement of the Dallas Police Department building? Were you there - it was on television. Why was Oswald buried secretly by the U.S. Secret Service, and later dug up, and what did they do with his body. Why are there no photographs of the Dallas Police officer, Tippett, that Oswald allegedly shot?

    One of the great action movies of the 1960's took place in Grant Park, Chicago, Illinois, with a cast of thousands of scraggly hippie-type war protesters screaming "The whole world is watching" as the Chicago Police Department go in more stick time than the Chicago Black Hawks hockey team, in 1968, at the Democratic National Convention. It was televised - do you believe it? Know anybody who got their teeth kicked in during that televised brawl. Do you believe it happened - it was only shown on television.

    Richard Nixon allegedlt flew AF 26000, Kennedy's plane, to Red China on an international open door mission, stunning the world, particularly the Russians. It was on television, broadcast to the world. You believe it? Ever met anybody who was with Nixon on that trip - I have.

    The clear truth that tinfoil hat doesn't accept is that the Space Race of the late 1950's and 1960's, which carried America to the moon, depended upon complete new technology, the type that today's technology would stun the NASA engineers of that era. It depended upon the invention of the tiny computer chip to accomplish the technology to go to the moon. It is only 230,000 miles away - we have airline passengers who have flown that far. To believe any of your fake moon landing stories, one has to disbelieve each and everything he or she ever saw on television in their lifetime, every citizen of the world who watched the moon landing in July 1969. Not just one or two engineers; not an out-of-it dying movie producer who deals in dreams, illusion, and smoke and mirrors and creates his or her own universe, but each and every single person in the entire world must agree with you that the moon landing's were faked - all of them - in order for any alleged evidence you have presented in your pilgrimage across "lost touch with reality" to be true.

    Nothing ever broadcast on television is true if your moon landing fake story is true. You don't seem to understand it, and the obtuse bullheadedness you continue to post to regarding it, just about as laughable as anything ever produced on the internet (another invention that owes its birth to the computer chip and the Space Race)...............
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    17,513
    Likes Received:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's one I forgot to put in my last post. Check out Jay Windley's lame behavior on page #2 of this thread. The moderator gave some pretty lame reasons for closing the thread.

    http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?87594-Chinese-space-walk-conspiracy/page2&


    The behavior of Jay Windley, the moderator, and the rest of the pro-official version posters was that of checkmated sophists. The way they addressed this guy's question is laughable; it would get them laughed out of the debating hall.


    Those people are indeed experts with good educations but they are dishonest experts with good educations. Citing their analyses of the Apollo anomalies only hurts your cause.
     
  7. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ad hominem spam. For some baffling reason you use the most insane circular reasoning to dismiss copious amounts of evidence. You use one of your other debunked to death and truly stupid conspiracy claims as a yard stick to then dismiss the entire testimony and rebuttal of a person who refutes that truly stupid conspiracy claim! Man you are one piece of work. You suck as a truther!

    All valid rebuttal that you have no answer to, You are routinely allowed to hijack threads with your spam which makes a mockery of your basketball forum "censorship" hogwash. You've got nothing but repeat cut and paste spam.
     
  8. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sorry Scott ... we have all seen the New Pearl Harbor vid that you have referenced hundreds of times ... having to sit through the hogwash was painful but interesting ... the information that it leaves out is the most glaring and "crushing" problem ... omission of facts is a example of redirect propaganda ... you've been fooled ... get used to it and get back in the real world ...
     
  9. stanfan

    stanfan New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    Messages:
    1,175
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or get a life.........shesh! Why hasn't this thread been closed, nothing he posts is accurate or truthful whatsoever - and more importantly, he has no credibility, and nobody cares............
     
  10. Descartes

    Descartes Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I disagree. First, it is a lot of fun to talk about the Apollo moon landings, and Scott does come up with some pretty good stuff. Instead of just dismissing his point of view, why don't you intelligently debate? And the reason they don't close this thread is that people continue to read and post here - like yourself, for example :)
     
  11. Falena

    Falena Cherry Bomb Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    23,372
    Likes Received:
    5,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fair Warning.

    Focus on the topic and not the member. Members are not the topic of discussion on this board.

    Falena
    Political Forum Administrator
     
  12. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,645
    Likes Received:
    13,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, no , no.. 9-11 was a hologram projection.
     
  13. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see any reason to doubt it. One can never be one hundred percent sure about anything unless one is an insider though.
     
  14. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It isn't 'evidence', it's speculation at best, and crude guesswork at worst.
     
  15. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    It's evidence. Your denial is the kind of thing people post on youtube. The lunar samples are not guesswork or speculation, the idea they could be faked is an example of both, also demonstrating extreme ignorance.
     
  16. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look mate they've been fooling you - don't take it out on me! [​IMG] Anyoldhoo, my comments aren't about local (lunar) stuff but the regular-as-clockwork contrived nonsensical intergalactic pronouncements issued with irritating regularity with a view to ensuring the 'research funding' keeps on coming in; I mean a lot of charlatans' jobs for life depend on it. :mrgreen: Bottom line: they're fully aware of the fact that however ridiculous a 'theory' they dream up, there's a big audience out there made up of folk just like yourself who, without the slightest bit of tangible evidence, will believe it, and they (the 'cosmologists' :roll: ) exploit it for all they're worth - and who can blame them? I don't, for one. I might be demonstrating 'extreme ignorance', but you're demonstrating 'extreme (almost childlike) naivete'. They're laughing at your gullibility, don't you understand that? Can't you see how condescending they're being? Here's today's dose of condescension: "Astronomers have found gas clouds in the distant Universe that are around 12 or 13 billion years old." I suppose you believe that too. :wall: :wall:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/science

    By the way, read my signature - the top one, and think about it?
     
  17. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    605
    Trophy Points:
    83
    LOL!!!

    AboveAlpha
     

Share This Page