Prove Flight 93 was a bunker buster

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Dec 21, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    An honest person would keep trying.'they never contacted me back' is a poor excuse
     
  2. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show me how it's done then. ;)
     
  3. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,697
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who, specifically, did you contact?
     
  5. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not my job to hold your hand whilst you dial the phone....I suggest you find a spine.
     
  7. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not my job to prove your guy's claim.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No one asked you to.

    If you were seeking the truth, however....
     
  9. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    What happened when you telephoned?
     
  10. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Maybe he doesn't have a phone, though since he's claimed to contact them we assume he tried by phone. There's no easily available email for the coroner's office at that website.
     
  11. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It was your claim you attempted to contact them.

    You have to prove you pressed the majority of the numbers.
     
  12. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said I telephoned? They never contacted me back and that's the LAST I'm going to speak of this.

    It's your guy's claim they are plane-buried witnesses, YOU prove it.

    Put up, or shut up.
     
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    AND it's your claim the plane was planted, YOU prove it.

    Put up, or shut up.
     
  14. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, my claim is nothing was buried. :-D
     
  15. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No, your claim is United 93 was planted at Shanksville.

    Prove it.
     
  16. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Go look at my threads, they are all about nothing was buried. Can't plant anything if there were nothing there to begin with. ;)

    Plus, that would be off-topic for this thread.
     
  17. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Well since Wally Miller's official public contact information connected to his job is an address and telephone number, and it is this forum's understanding you contacted Miller, it's fair to assume you used one of those two methods.

    Unless you're saying you sent snailmail, it's reasonable to assume you phoned him.

    If you phoned him, you either left a message, someone took a message or you were transferred to him and spoke directly. All these options could be described as "never contacted you back", though the last one would be dishonest.

    Your refusal to clarify your contact experience is odd given the context of the debate.
     
  18. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm referring to your general theory on United 93 and you know it game player.

    It's completely on-topic to this thread.
     
  19. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back on topic:

    Prove Flight 93 was a 'bunker buster'
     
  20. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    Why are you unwilling to back up your own theory?
     
  21. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    You think you get to pick and chose what you need to respond to to prove your point? This is not true. You can ignore the question but the result is no one will take your claim to have contacted Wally or any other witness seriously.

    You tried to use Wally Miller to support your arguments. It shouldn't have been a surprise when the contact issue resurfaced. Because rational people who want answers would have tried to contact the witnesses in question.

    Your forum behavior is not rational for someone who claims they're interested in facts.
     
  22. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    You're the one who tried to use Wally Miller to support your ideas.
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It IS your job to prove it wrong.

    Get to it.
     
  24. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Remind me.
     
  25. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18

    I think he got the idea he's a mod, lol. He's also confusing off topic with making a point using an element connected to the topic, a confusion he's only applying to other people, not himself.

    The issue of contacting witnesses in Shanksville about what happened in Shanksville to prove or disprove a "theory" about the attacks in Shanksville is by definition ON topic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page