I've seen it now; thanks for the information... I would love to hear what happens in court.. Unfortunatily I noticed this from the article: I would have concern that this case gets chucked out prematurely as well.
I wasn't implying that you were. Afghanistan have comparatively lots of caves as they are geographically suited of course, and thanks for your explanation about that term as well!
The 19 hijackers lived here; Osama was found in a safe house. KSM was in Islamabaad if I recall. It's just another false sacrament in their religion of ignorance. You see this throughout their arguments. WTC7. The only thing unique about 7 compared to the other WTC buildings is the time it fell; much later in the day. The other 6 buildings were, of course, damaged as well. Yet none of these "researchers" say a word about them. And naturally the stories about it falling became more and more spectacular with every passing month in twoofer lore. When they found out there were government offices in the buildings...oh my God the conspiracy tide rolled in. Like most tides in a polluted lake, a fair a mount of garbage was deposited as well. Lets look at the Pentagon; there are claims of missile attacks instead of crashing a plane into the building. As if they would just hijack a plane for s**ts and giggles. One of the overwhelmingly stupid summations of this group of morons is that the attacks were carried out by the US to engender fear so there would be no opposition to going to war overseas. While on the face of it; the argument is merely silly, when one considers the nuances of the 9/11 Official story, it would seem that the plotters missed a real opportunity. They should have used a missile, I suggest. What is more fearful than a band of terrorists loose on the countryside with a missile launcher? Yet somehow, the plotters--who would later use the same entity they attacked--settled for the complex hijacking of planes and getting people to commit suicide by crashing them into the buildings. Perhaps the most glaringly ignorant stance taken by some twoofers is how they gauge the reaction of the government and the military as if they are an all-hazards, all-powerful, and frankly omniscient in the realm of the plan, the tactics, and the strength of an enemy whose De facto army materialized 2 hours earlier. While its true that the military is supposed to defend the country, assuming that they are ready for all threats, anywhere, at any time and can react at a moment's notice is folly. Yet, again, the sacrament of twooferism is that everything operates just as it would in training, on a powerpoint presentation, or on a video game. Someone should tell them that the world isn't their X-Box. I don't know that I would call it racism. It's certainly inaccurate. It's certainly silly. And it's certainly a stereotype that they use to paint this paradox between our supposed superiority due to our culture versus their inferiority based on their culture. Once you peel back the labels and look at the principals who were involved in the attacks, their argument falls apart at faster than free-fall speed; it develops a gravity of it's own that sucks it down to the earth. This is true of any of their sacraments; just keep peeling back their layers upon layers of moronic arguments and callus indifference to reality and you see that the entire argument is based on lies and assumptions that have little basis in fact.
