Ravi Zacharias, sexual predator, The greatest Apologist of his Generation!

apparently not. not a drop.

 

You didn't know the guy so quit making things up.

 

Please show where I have attacked the poster. For the third time can you answer the questions?

 

We know the guy was a sexual predator who used god to get sexual pleasure. We know he accused one of his victims of trying to blackmail him and excluded her from her christian community by lying about her. We know he was filth who used women. What is there to make up about this loathsome individual?
If you can stomach it, watch how he has made this woman suffer.


Ravi accused the husband of "pimping his wife for monetary gain" when he had used her confusion over spiritual matters to get indecent photographs of her. You want us to ignore the evidence that this guy was a liar of the first kind and look for truth in this perverted mans writings?

 

nice show!
odd her friends believe shes just in it for the money
nice drama queen hit piece you wrote
so fair and balanced judge jury and executioner no facts required ron whats his side of the story?

 

It is with shattered hearts that we issue this statement about the allegations against RZIM’s Founder, Ravi Zacharias.

Following allegations made in late August of 2020 that Ravi had engaged in sexual misconduct and abuse in connection with two day spas, we commissioned Miller & Martin PLLC, a law firm with experience in corporate and sex crimes investigations, to conduct an independent investigation. We gave Miller & Martin a broad scope to pursue any avenues that they judged to be relevant to the accusations, and we emphasized that our only purpose for the investigation was to ascertain the full truth.

Having received the results of the investigation, we are publicly releasing the investigation report in the exact form that we received it. We have been waiting to make an extended statement in the hope that the full findings of the investigation would allow us to speak more accurately and meaningfully. We also wanted to ensure Miller & Martin’s independence in their investigation, assessments, and reporting of the findings.



To be victimized by unwanted sexual contact, advances, and behavior is horrendous. It is diametrically opposed to everything we believe about the value and dignity of every single person. We believe not only the women who made their allegations public but also additional women who had not previously made public allegations against Ravi but whose identities and stories were uncovered during the investigation. Tragically, witnesses described encounters including sexting, unwanted touching, spiritual abuse, and rape. We are devastated by what the investigation has shown and are filled with sorrow for the women who were hurt by this terrible abuse.

The investigation’s conclusions have caused us to think very differently about the allegations Mrs. Lori Anne Thompson made against Ravi in 2017. We were wrong.

https://www.rzim.org/read/rzim-updates/board-statement

 

Of course guilt by accusation!

Thats how Stalin tried people before he executed them.

"We would like to thank each journalist, advocate, and concerned member of the public who brought accusations of sexual misconduct and abuse to our attention."

No trial required.
Atheist religion at its finest!

 

Brilliant, you did not notice the entire content was from RZIN one of the biggest CHRISTIAN organizations, a classic KOKO own goal, keep them coming!

 

Yep I noticed they clearly stopped at ACCUSATIONS and you clearly claimed guilt.
Sure thing ron!
people in glass houses should learn not to throw rocks.

 

You are so funny when trying to back track, quite cheered up my day, stick at your single handed attempts to ridicule atheists by attacking statements from Christian organizations!

 

dont blame me for pointing out and exposing the ridicule atheists bring upon themselves.
assigning a guilty verdict was all on you ron.

 

No Koko, there is no one who does not admit he is guilty apart from those who have no idea what they are talking about but want to continue their personal crusade of internet silliness against atheists and Jews! Keep up the good work, you always brighten up the forum with your funny interruptions on a dull day! Be happy!

 

we get it ron.
you represent the best atheists have to offer.
no trial required, guilt by accusation,
sorry I interrupted your pity party
are you going to publicly hang him today, or does he get the firing squad?

 

It must have been deeply painful for the victims of Ravi’s abuse and misconduct to tell their stories and to relive their terrible experiences as they participated in this investigation. To you we say directly: Words cannot come close to expressing the sorrow that we feel for what you have been through or the gratitude we feel for the bravery with which you have responded. We are so thankful to you, and we are so sorry.
https://www.rzim.org/read/rzim-updates/board-statement

Only in Koko world can this be seen as not being an admission of guilt by genuine theists who recognize what Ravi did. but an atheist plot!

 

English not your primary language?

"We would like to thank each journalist, advocate, and concerned member of the public who brought ACCUSATIONS of sexual misconduct and abuse to our attention."

I realize this is extremely complicated for those in the business of condemning anything to do with God and religion, however PRESUMPTION of innocence of alleged victims and you dealt atheist justice handed down a guilty verdict without trial are 2 different things.

So allow me to help you.

repeat after me:

accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt
accusations are not proof of guilt

presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence
presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence

victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim
victim allegations are not proof they are a victim

There I hope that helps
feel better now?

btw, if this goes to court and he is proven not guilty he will have a very fat wallet.

 

Did you even bother to read it?

The conclusions we report here are based solely on conduct for which, in our judgment, there is credible evidence.

We also acknowledge possible selection bias in this investigation.

lewd behavior is not sexual misconduct, nothing there but conjecture, yet you hand out a guilty verdict with no trial.

 

Yes Koko now why do you not start defending Jimmy Saville, he was never found guilty in his lifetime but is described by theist, atheists and agnostic as the UK greatest pedophile and sexual predator, defending a pedo along side Ravi and Adolf Hitler should get you the attention you crave!

 

Nah its so much more fun to point out the modus operandi of stalinist atheism.
Its not my OP its all you!
Im not the one condemning him without a trial you are.
So you admit guilty by accusation is the neoatheist british way of justice now days eh...
how long before summary executions?
Can I get a front row seat for the show?

 

Sadly not, did you not know how difficult it is for holocaust deniers to travel to Europe especially when they have served time for it!

 

You said there was “more truth in his books and videos”, something you just made up. How well did you know him?

 

Which holocaust ron? The Jews had about 40 of them.

why would I ever want to travel the european shithole?

Thought police that disrespect inherent human rights to free speech.

 

Better than you.

 

Do you think the people who worked and lived with him knew him well? If so did they help him to abuse women?

 

Maybe then the responsible thing would have been to tell him to not molest people while making up hilarious fiction. Did you tell him to stop?

 

Actually I think the responsible thing would be to quit making up stories about a dead man.