I'd say it's 'convenient' they aren't available for scrutiny (kinda like those 83 cameras yielding 'nothing showing a plane striking the Pentagon, and kinda like the lack of verifiable evidence that Flight 93 supposedly crashed there). I suppose I could understand them not surviving controlled demolition but, that's also convenient. Further, I think anyone that rejects outright what the available evidence (eyewitness testimony, nano-thermite, and on and on) shows while insisting the Kean report is squeaky clean in its content (or lack of) is themselves 'extremely ignorant and disingenuous).
Read my previous post. It's leverage and a fulcrum. Think, think think. I'm not even stating this is what happened. I'm merely stating its a possibility in the world of physics. I want everyone to avoid looking at that one dimensional cartoon gif of a plane and think about it in motion at high speed. What will happen upon impact? Consider a seesaw with the fulcrum off center. You jump on the short end dropping at 20 miles an hour. Because of the off center fulcrum the long end might accelerate upwards at 40 miles per hour. Now turn it sideways and make it a swept back wing design. The fulcrum would be the point the wing originally snapped which would be closer to the body due to the swept back design.
You keep ducking the evidence, Boss. Those 85 videos are public, and you've been linked to them. Still you keep making the same debunked claims. Those paychecks must be pretty big for you to sacrifice your morals this way.
This speaks volumes about what is going on here, PLEASE people if you care about the issue at all, LOOK AT EVERYTHING, and then make up your own mind, use the intellect that your creator endowed you with. In response to the "seesaw" explanation, please note that it takes energy to accelerate anything and that energy must come from someplace or something, but it doesn't just magically happen.
My aren't you extremely obtuse. The energy comes from a velocity of 500 mph. What is so difficult to understand about that? I'm trying very hard to get you to use your intellect but so far your lacking.
Uh yeah you too warden. Obtuse. Would either of you care to refute my hypothesis or simply stare at that little cartoon drawing without a singular thought in your head?
To attempt to address the issue, there are all sorts of voids, places where there should be INFORMATION however there is none because nobody tested for explosives, or there are pictures missing where there should be pictures, or testimony from specific individuals who most certainly have something to say on the subject, but were not allowed to tell what they know to the commission. The taxpayers funded a HALF BAKED FARCE. as a taxpayer, are you happy about that?
Do you remember the plane that crashed into the Florida Everglades? There was next to nothing ever found of aircraft parts, let alone your "serial numbered" parts. What is the truthers explanation to this crash where parts were almost nonexistent ? Or perhaps you prefer not to answer this. This from CBS at the time,"Thick smoke filled the cabin, the pilots lost control, and the plane smashed into the shallow waters of the Everglades at near top speed. The plane disintegrated on impact".
and so it should be that an event that only happens maybe once in 40 years of aviation history, happens 4 times in the same day, what are the odds?
I see. So, they (the hijackers) knew live simulations of planes crashing into buildings was being exercised, and they somehow what? Commandeered the military for a couple of hours? Poor security on the part of the folks running said exercises, wouldn't you say?
9-11 took months if not years of planning and training. Finding 20 or so morons and getting them on the same page was not easy. Yep . . .4 times that day.
So training of hijackers = cause for having 4 airliners virtually disappear.... or? not to mention the total destruction of 3 skyscrapers.
I do not get what you mean by virtually disappear. Virtually in my book means "almost or nearly no effect". Don't know about you, but I saw three planes hit three separate buildings, 2 in NYC and the one in DC has overwhelming proof that plane hit Pentagon. I really do not understand what truthers are wanting to know. The evidence is overwhelming even for someone such as yourself. Did you know that one of the jet engines in NYC kept right on going through the WTC and landed on the street below? WTF are you after?
