The mainstream media ( etc... ) made the claim that the jet engine was from the alleged FLT175 however there has never been any proof of that shown, and in fact challenges to the validity of this claim go totally unanswered. Have you ever heard of Dr. Reynolds?
Yeah, and he is a buffoon and in over his head with ignorance when it comes to 9/11 and FLT 175. Engines were recovered and their parts did in fact match what we expected.
Really?...the egine parts found were those that would be found in the engines know to be on the plane. This has been addressed and debunked many times over. I'm not sure if the engine parts SN were kept and documented. Not to mention, it's not uncommon for planes with a long life span to consist of many non-factory parts as the go through years of maintenance and up keep.
So there has been no documented serial number checking, and you allege sloppy record keeping on the part of the airlines? Really?
I don't allege anything, where did I do that? You're the one who has alledged sloppy documenting / no documenting WITHOUT actually knowing. Not only that, you are asking to prove a negative.
Still missing: an inventory of aircraft bits sufficient to confirm the "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" & "FLT93" aircraft also where is that report on the tests for explosives or explosive residue?
How do you know is "still missing"? Just because YOU do not have it or cannot find it, does not mean its missing. You are again, asserting and then attempting to apply some nefarious intent. Ask the FBI.
This catch all "ask the FBI" is getting old, when I'm told "oh there are pictures all over the web" and then when it comes down to actually providing links, nobody has any, and as with these alleged reports, you see .... its easy to find things such as NIST NC-STAR 1A no problem, however, if reports on the tests for explosives exist, where are they?
...and you just assume they dont exist. So, will you send an email or contact the FBI to see if they do exist?
Guaranteed for certain the last link you posted for me I read and nowhere in that document does it specify that the FBI looked for evidence of explosives. Look at the link you posted.
so the idea that explosives may have been used to destroy WTC 1, 2 & 7 is so ridiculous .... that the people who could have tested for explosives, didn't because it was obvious no explosives were used .... is that it? BTW: this then negates the claim that the FBI tested for explosives and found none. Witch is it? they tested and found nothing, or they didn't test because it was obvious that no explosives were used? Please at least attempt to keep the story straight.
You are catching on. They tested after all the outrage from the conspiracy theorists but found nothing.
The lingering question, is what did they test, and by what technique and where is that DOCUMENTED? indeed when did they do this testing? Without INFORMATION, its only an empty claim that testing was done at all. and as for why anybody should have considered testing for explosives, note that the talking heads on TV mentioned how the "collapse" of WTC7 so much resembled CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. and indeed if you play the video for a random sample of people, they will say that is a CD. and as we all know, if it quacks like a duck, has web-feet like a duck, has feathers like a duck, ya know, it just may be a duck. get the picture?
To answer this one, its not the hijackings I was referring to but the total loss of an airliner, the bits that were allegedly recovered from the various crash sites constitute insufficient evidence for any conclusion about airliners having ever been there at all.
There will always be a lingering question for those that cannot accept facts. - - - Updated - - - With the exception that they were parts of an airliner. LOL
you can produce the word "FACTS" but can you support your argument with documentation? The mainstream media alleged that AMERICA was attacked by radical Arabs, and as yet, they have produced no proof at all that what they allege has anything to it at all.
Question, WHAT airliner? if the bits can not be certified as being from either "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" or "FLT93" all you have is a bit of scrap metal, where is the certification by NTSB ( or? ) that indeed the aircraft that was alleged to have crashed at the various sites was indeed the aircraft that was found? or even the parts thereof.....
They have produced plenty of evidence. It is not everyone else's problem that you are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theory self that you can't see any of it. - - - Updated - - - Like you keep proving, you have no concept of aircraft construction or physics. You appear to be at the level of scientific knowledge as the Salem Witch trials.
The nay-sayers here could put this matter to rest right now, by actually producing DOCUMENTATION, but the fact is that its highly unlikely that any documentation exists because the tests for explosives were never done, the alleged aircraft wreckage is but a heap of scrap metal and the whole bit is a farce. You see, the real burden of PROOF is on the people who first asserted that there were Arabs hijacking airliners, and that has never been proven and all that follows, that is the allegation that there really was an airliner crashed into either of the towers or for that matter the PENTAGON. Standard procedure for airliner crashes was NOT followed and there has been no inventory of what is alleged to be the aircraft bits. and the AMERICAN public is buying this crap?
and the lack of support for outrageous arguments like radical Arabs hijacked airliners and crashed into buildings. The radical Arabs are a MYTH. & I can say that with great confidence because there is absolutely zip, zero, nothing for actual documented proof that said radical Arabs actually even boarded the commercial flights, or for that matter, did "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" or "FLT93" exist at all? The first one to make the assertion ( that is the mainstream media ) has not provided the solid data for any of the allegations. What do we have that actually PROVES the Arab Hijackers story?
