Rename the Women's Rights Section... or get rid of it

Okay, don't look at my username. Now answer the question. Pretty Please!

 

Allow me Gwendoline.

Seeing as you hate all liberals, male and female, I would say that's a much bigger group than the people the women you are describing in such an eloquent way hate.

Old farts like you with old farts' opinions are a dying breed.

Like it or not but there are a lot more people with liberal views than people who share those backward stone age opinions you are trying to sell us.

 

You got it wrong Majorie, I don't hate liberals, I love em. Its liberalism I hate to the core for its un American and a detriment to our society.

 

Oh poor bugger. Your big America is but a shadow of its greater self. Thanks to you and your war mad friends.

 

Got it wrong again Marjorie. America is facing financial inslovency because of obama's overspending, and facing a drop in our military strength because of obama's need to stop funding our military complex and of playing dove/pacifist games with the commies in looking to downsize our nukes. Have no fear though marge, capitalism will come back to America come January of next year. Sure hope your welfare benefits stay solvent for the next 6 months or so, for your sake.

 

WOW! A psychic!

Blind Freddie, and blind Freda can see that feminism isn`t about equality. Feminism is a sexist club for the bitter, the rejected missfits with no social skills. Real women without the aforementioned hangups are an entirely different category. Real women, - LOVE EM!

VIVA LA REAL WOMEN!

 

Sexist men defining women. LOL.

It would be funny if it wasn't so DUMB.

It would be funny if it wasn't so predictable and sexist and dreary...

In a word: Glib.

 

No, what she's really saying is..."mommy, when I grow up I want to wear combat boots, cut my hair down to a presentable 'butch' like length like my bulldyke girlfriends have, cover my ugly body with as many outrageous tattos that my lover will allow and then get married to my lover in the liberal state of Massachusetts alongside all those other lesbo couples who pioneered their way into the 21st century by living out their fantasies in our new utopian world. Mommy, we don't need men in our world, and if we decide to propagate more of our dear little dykes, we can always pay a visit to our nearest sperm bank location.

 

That one must have cut close to the bone, LOL.

 

When Rush says "I know liberals like every inch of my glorious naked body"--think of my response as me knowing femanazis like every inch of my glorious naked body.

 

Glorious naked body, LOL!! What an ugly fat slug. This is your mentor? An unhealthy repulsive FAT man. And you talk about how women look... while you revere the ugliest slob on earth?

Glorious naked body. Christ, but how delusional can you get!!!



You sexist men are a riot. Truly.

 

Where did you get LH`s photo Gwen? Or was it just an emotional wank?

 

Oh get off the Patriarchy crap already. There is no more legal patriarchy and you know it. You got divorce and family laws changed, you got your affirmative action and your bull (*)(*)(*)(*) laws that say a woman cannot be penalized for loss of productivity while having children, etc. IOW. Women have it better than men now.

The only benefit Feminism has been for men is in the bedroom, where biology says we still rule because we choose who and who not to approach in the first place, because women don't approach men in the real world.

So we get to choose who make our interest known too and guess what? Men don't like fat ugly hags with attitude problems about BS patriarchy myths.

Another way that women have lost is that women aren't attracted to men of lower social status than themselves, so that dried up old husk who spent her fertile years getting Phd not only has her biological clock ticking away to worry about, but the fact that her dating pool has shrunk to less than 5% of all men because no woman with PhD is going to get with anyone but a man who is also a PhD and those men are out banging women 20 years younger than the old hag.

Men are biologically attuned to be attracted to younger, fertile women. We have no interest in cougars and fat girls carrying around the bastard spawn of several men. Those girls are for pumping and dumping.

That's probably the biggest flaw of feminism. That it tells fat ugly hags they are entitled to a guy who looks like Brad Pitt.

40% of the female population is clinically obese. Obese women are not attractive no matter how smart they are.

Truly desirable men don't settle for fat "plain janes". The only men having sex with fatties are the losers in the natural selection pool. When it comes to attraction in men, we care about one thing and one thing only. Looks.

men don't want fat, smart plain women. We want voluptuous, beautiful and proportioned women and any man that has options will gladly marry a dumb, pretty woman over a smart, accomplished plain jane with to much body fat or boyish manjaws.

 

^^^

 

Gwen, I am trying to understand your point of view, and I must admit I am not succeeding very much. If you think feminism can legislate attitude-heavy, antisocial, and fat women to appear beautiful, friendly, and loving, then do you also think that misoginy can legislate short, fat, and jerkish men to appear gorgeous, charming, and encouraging?

 

lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I'm a feminist. Not attitude-heavy, antisocial or fat. Nor are my feminist friends. We’re an attractive, active, social bunch of women.

As for Misogynists they can speak for themselves… and Christ, they sure do a lot of that on this forum!!

Your idea that feminists are attitude-heavy, antisocial and fat, I find quite funny. The feminists I know, and I know a lot, are savvy, friendly, committed to great friendships and primary relationships, have great jobs, are family-orientated, and are kind people. You and some others who depict feminists in such a derogatory way are OUT OF TOUCH. I think it's the fact that feminists aren't drawn to sexist men... so sexist men HAVE NO IDEA about feminism. Because a feminist wouldn't give them the time of day. Except on an internet forum because the sexist men are easy to SWITCH OFF.

Fair enough. It works out quite well.

Feminists move in FAR FAR different circles to sexist men. Good job, too!!

 

So if what you are saying here is true that your unique group of feminist friends are social, attractive, have great jobs, are kind people, and this is my favorite--are family-oriented, then how do you expalin the actions and rhetoric of the in-your-face militant radical feminists that we see on TV or read about from various national sources who have the exact opposite of those traits you mentioned? Surely you and your friends support the radical feminist agenda of your idols who unlike you are granted the 'RIGHT' to share their foreign views under the national spotlight.

 

If feminists are family oriented, as per your description, then how do feminists reconcile their demand for control with their other demand that their husbands have commanding social status? (By the way the latter is every woman's wish, feminist or not.)

 

What the heck does 'commanding social status' entail? My missus just asks that I do my share (a bargaining nightmare because of various pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects) and that our geographic mobility is determined through rational consideration of both careers

 

No one has ever said that a woman has special Rights but what is a fact is that women are denied the equal Rights they have.

What is really foolish are those that don't understand simple biology and the "Right to Life" which applies to "Persons" and not to "non-persons" under the US Constitution. Here is a simple flow chart:

CONCEPTION = zygote > embryo > fetus (non-persons); BIRTH = baby (person)

Prior to birth murder cannot occur because murder relates to the unlawful death of a person. A zygotes, embryo, and/or a fetus is NOT a person and cannot be murdered under the US Constitution.

 

That one threw me for a loop as well.