Replacement 'theory'

Then you should have no trouble QUOTING him. But of course... you will!

 

I thought that you were saying that the theory itself isn't even real.

 

CNN came out with their story about how Carlson was supporting the Buffalo killer because he was promoting replacement theory over 400 times.
Yet the Buffalo killer had nothing to do with replacement theory. Its was just yet another fake CNN propaganda to try and crawl out of their lowest ratings in history.
And if anyone actually watched Carlson he was talking about voter replacement with illegal votes which is why the Biden administration refuses to do anything about the border.
So you can tell very quickly the last CNN hold outs that come on here and start regurgitating their CNN replacement theory propaganda.

 

That sounds accurate. Wait, how many since????? We're being overrun. Of course, people who don't live where these people infest and destroy will pretend there isn't a huge problem.

 

Posters like @chris155au have long held the belief that if a person doesn't SAY the crime or immoral action they commit, then they are not guilty. In this case, he demanded I quote Tucker say the exact words "Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory". And if I don't show those exact words, then he assumes Carlson is not pushing white supremacist propaganda. He and others have done this in the past. If we can't quote Trump saying to Zolensky "I am hereby extorting you" then they feel comfortable claiming that he wasn't extorting him, even though it's clear to any moderately intelligent individual that he wanted this "favor" in exchange for the missiles.

 

If you admit that no one knows, then it means the whole claim was pulled off the seat of your pants.

You: This lake is very deep

Me: Do you know the depth?

You: No. No one knows

Me: So, how do you know its deep?

You: Oh, its deep. Believe me.

 

Someone posted a compilation of Tucker going on and on about the replacement theory. I have to believe my own ears and eyes, even if @chris155au does not.

 

None whatsoever. And I did, as a matter of fact (in a different thread). But I'll pass doing it here so the absurdity of your argument is what remains...

 

I don't find being concerned about illegal aliens voting to be bigoted at all. In fact, if you're not concerned about it then I question your very judgement, because as I have shown on multiple occasions (but nobody seems to want to discuss it), it's astonishingly easy for an illegal to register to vote, with no questions asked, and no proof of citizenship required. All done on the "honor system" which is freaking stupid, and whichever politician(s) are responsible for that should be impeached.

 

What about it? Most States do not require it, you just say you're "Stephen Miller", and BOOM, you're Stephen Miller.

 

No, most States (35) DO require it.

 

And the 2nd part of your post is also misinformed, because every one of the 15 States where they do not have Voter ID laws, they have procedures to challenge voter eligibility, so you can't just say "I'm Steve Miller" and then vote. Where are you getting this stuff?

 

"Black criminals could be my family, don't be mean to them".

Obama, probably.*

 

These can be called 'distinction without a difference' arguments. Obviously they are highly disingenuous.
"A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid."

 

Its happened and people were caught doing it. Stating that it has happened and that the laws are atrocious isn't a claim pulled from where ever. It's a fact.

 

I haven't heard him spew bigotry. I must have missed that episode.

 

It never left and you don't need to put the word "theory" in quotes. The Left has been pushing this lie for years claiming it was going to turn TX, AZ and FL Blue. Like much of what the Left pushes, it's yet another pile of crap, though it did incite a mass murderer. You are right, it's time for the Left to drop this. For one thing, it's not working. We aren't a racist nation, we are divided by Class, not race, And the Left's screw up on this is relegating them to a rump regional party who can only win if they can enrage blacks by convincing them that they are hated and exploited, which of course, is hateful and exploitative by the Dems to lie to them like that for the DNC's benefit.

HOW’S THAT REPLACEMENT THEORY THING WORKIN’ OUT FOR YA? Biden’s Hispanic approval rating plummets to 26% in new poll: Biden approval rating among Hispanics was at 55% last year.

​

Even Ruy Texeira, the originator of the “emerging Democratic majority” theory, is backpedaling.

​

20 years the political Left has been pushing this "Replacement Theory" crap. The trouble with much of the Left is that they don't seem to be smart enough to change course when they are headed for a cliff.

 

You forgot. Bernie Sanders told his followers that Republicans were taking away their free healthcare. Incited by Bernie Sanders and the Democrats, Hodgkinson said ,,, "This is for healthcare!" ,,, and proceeded to fire at Republican Congressmen with the intent to kill them to get the free stuff Democrats told him he was owed.

On the other hand, the Buffalo shooter identified as an "eco-fascist", murdering people in the name of AOC's Green New Deal ,,, NOT free healthcare.

The Buffalo shooter also claimed that his choice of crime scene was based on Democrat Gun Control. The party that doxed gun owners as punishment for exercising their 2nd Amendment rights were actually singling out homes that were safe to invade since they had no means of self defense. To your shooter, New York was safe to attack because it was unlikely law abiding victims would own a means of self defense.

The shooter wore body armor that could not be penetrated by firearms that were legal in New York. Despite the fact that 15 times more people are murdered by knives than by rifles, possession of silverware is OK in NY ,,, but ARs are considered weapons of war.

Sorry you have destroyed the country in less than a year, but your drivel isn't going to undo your inflation, bring back those you murdered with the drugs you brought through the southern border, save your victims of human trafficking, end the war you started by funding Putin's military buildup and giving Putin an alternative to pumping gas through Ukraine, killing 750,000 Americans that didn't have to die of the COVID virus since January 20, 2021 ,,, the virus developed with funding by Obama-Biden&Fauci starting in 2014.

Best of luck in November. You will need it.

 

@DentalFloss, your response?

 

Well I'm not making any argument, I'm simply asking for evidence. But anyway, wouldn't my "argument" -- whatever you think it is -- be even MORE absurd if you presented evidence which counters it? Obviously you would JUMP at that opportunity, so clearly you don't actually have any evidence that Carlson said "great replacement."

 

Name ONE SINGLE Republican talking about Great Replacement Theory. Just ONE!

 

Incorrect actually. I was responding to your claim that "Tucker DID say 'Great Replacement.'" So you didn't quite claim that he said "Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory."

You said:

And I said:

So you weren't even able to quote him saying THAT! You will only be able to quote him talking about "replacement." That's it. And he is talking about changing voting demographics via immigration, mostly of the illegal kind. He is NOT talking about racial replacement. Is the word "replacement" a stupid way to frame it? Sure. Does he frame it as a conspiracy? Sure. Is all of this unhelpful? Sure.

 

You seem to be confused. The shooter's manifesto makes it crystal clear that he was motivated by the nonsensical Great Replacement Theory. You may have missed it. However, the Great Replacement Theory is not what Carlson talks about. What do you mean when you talk about "replacement theory?" Do you think that it's a real thing and the thing which Carlson talks about which is to do with "voter replacement with illegal votes?"

 

@Pro_Line_FL to begin, 35 out of 50 States requiring proof of citizenship in order to register to vote is nowhere near good enough. However, it doesn't matter, thanks to our federal government. You see, there is a federal form, available in 27(!) different languages (that you can find here), where a current utility bill with your name on it is good enough for the feds. These languages include Russian, Chinese, Korean, and Arabic, which represents much of the military threat to our country on the planet, too, so if you just happen to be a Chinese spy or soldier, we just made it so much easier for you to meddle in our affairs.

If you actually bother taking a look at it, you'll note that each State has ID requirements on top of that utility bill, and they all pretty much say the exact same thing. But, for the edification of anyone who doesn't bother actually downloading the form but who is nonetheless curious, I picked the reddest state there is, The Republic of Texas, where you would think they would actually require proof of citizenship, but like all the others, they don't. Here's what Texas' instructions say:

The last 4 digits of your social is the closest they (or any of the other States, with a handful of exceptions outlined below) came to requiring actual proof of citizenship, but that number is neither unique to you (there are only 10,000 possible "last-4" numbers which means pick a number at random, say 0473, and you've just picked a number that millions of other Americans have that verifies jack squat), nor does it prove anything. I didn't see a single State's requirements (and to make sure I wasn't about to stick my foot in my mouth, I read all of them, and Florida's is almost word for word identical) ask for a Birth Certificate, or a Passport, or your Naturalization document(s), or a Report of a US Citizen born abroad" (which is a real thing, I know because I have one), or any other actual document(s) that would prove a thing.

Exceptions include New Mexico, Tennessee, and Virginia, who say a full SSN is required, but the feds say otherwise so if it ever went to Court, those laws would probably lose. Several others ask for it, but then turn around and say it's not required. North Dakota doesn't have voter registration (extremely odd, no idea how that works), so this form would be invalid, and Wyoming refuses to accept it, another case that would probably lose in Court.

So, just make up a random 4-digit number, and as long as you submit the paperwork in time for whatever State you are an illegal resident of, and POOF, you're voting in the next election.

Yes, it is a crime, but one with no way to suspect or investigate, and I bet if you showed up on election day looking Chinese and not speaking a word of English, but with the magic registration card, anyone who even raised a question would likely be crucified for racial profiling, would likely be fired, and made infamous by the woke left, who actually wants illegals to vote. Why? They know that illegals like free stuff from the gubmint, making them a ****-ton more likely to vote for dems who promise more and more of it. See "Build Back Bankrupt" for the most recent example.

So, you were saying?

 

Texas is the reddest state?