Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Cre

Full title:
Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"


As Galileo, Columbus, William Harvey and countless others attacked for their science and beliefs, we add another nail in the coffin to the vast human caused climate change conspiracy. More evidence of data issues despite the religious zealots of the world screaming the science is settled. Will we ever get back to a point where the facts can be debated again or is this new religion never going to allow it?


As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:



In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.



As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.



The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.



Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. (Full Abstract Report)

Of course, this won’t stop global climate normalcy deniers from saying it’s all one big conspiracy to destroy the earth. They’ll naturally argue that data adjustments to the temperatures need to be made for a variety of reasons, which is something the report doesn’t dispute. What it does show, however, is that these “adjustments” always prove to be to the upside. Always warmer, never cooler:



While the notion that some “adjustments” to historical data might need to be made is not challenged, logically it would be expected that such historical temperature data adjustments would sometimes raise these temperatures, and sometimes lower them. This situation would mean that the impact of such adjustments on the temperature trend line slope is uncertain. However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.

In short: The evidence has been falsified.

Karl Denninger sums it up succinctly:



It is therefore quite-clear that the data has been intentionally tampered with.



Since this has formed the basis for plans to steal literal trillions of dollars and has already resulted in the forced extraction of hundreds of billions in aggregate for motorists and industry this quite-clearly constitutes the largest economic fraud ever perpetrated in the world.



I call for the indictment and prosecution of every person and organization involved, asset-stripping all of them to their literal underwear.

The real data looks something like this:



(Via ZeroHedge.com)

And the establishment, along with their fanatical global warming myrmidons, continue to push the need for massive, costly initiatives to reduce green house gases and global temperatures to “normal” levels.

The problem, of course, is that there is no global warming according to the above referenced report.

Moreover, none of those supporting the Paris Climate Agreement and other initiatives have any idea what these behemoth regulations will actually do to curb climate change, as evidenced by the following video of Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, who despite his best efforts, can’t seem to figure out exactly how these agreements actually lower temperatures and help Americans:








http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-

 

It has been a scam from the start. Only the gullible are buying into it.

 

Oh, yeah, virtually ALL of climatologists are certainly being "scammed" or are "scamming" us all, and the secret is being exposed by a meteorologist with an honorary degree!

It must be legit!

http://www.snopes.com/climatology-fraud-global-warming/

 

Dr. Alan Carlin: His doctorate is in economics, he worked for the EPA as a senior economic analyst and manager,

Dr. Harold H. Doiron: Doctorate in mechanical engineering,

Dr. Theodore R. Eck: Doctorate in ecomomics, worked for Amoco and Exxon.

Dr. Richard A. Keen: Someone who actually has a doctorate related to climate, He is also the Chief Economist for the Standard Oil Company.

Dr. Anthony R. Lupo: Doctorate in atmospheric science

Dr. Thomas P. Sheahen: Doctorate in Physics

Dr. George T. Wolff: Doctorate in environmental sciences

All of the above are involved or are active board members in organizations that receive a large portion of their funding from oil companies

These are the peers from the EPA, MIT and other universities that reviewed this. The one from the EPA is an economist.

It was not published in an unbiased journal for review by peers. Only the abridged work meant for release to the general public is available. It lacks any real detail regarding the methodology used or the exact sources of the data. Out of the 7 who reviewed it 3 do not hold doctorates related to climate. All have ties to oil companies except one.

Not saying the conclusion is wrong, just there are many things questionable about it.

I suggest looking at what was happening prior to the ending of the use of leaded gasoline. Same thing was happening. People with ties to oil were saying the lead build up in the environment was natural. Those people who worked at refineries lead poisoning was not the result of working there. Oil companies then used the same tactics, except then they used some strong arming and threats.

 

Nobody says ALL. Just 97%

 

But I read it on the internet and Al Gore says it's true...

 

That figure has been completely debunked.

 

Typical for climate scientists – lie, lie, lie, ad hom, poison the well , use all other fallacies, and lie, lie and lie again.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...te-change-data.509557/page-10#post-1067752124

People who WORKED for oil companies are not scumbags, they do not do fake science, climatologists are scumbags and climatology is the fake science.

Now find who out of 7 is a Christian and who once said something against man on man marriage (and if that does not help post a cartoon reflecting the level of your thinking) and you are done with destroying the report which says NOTHING NEW but a kind of summarizes everything which was repeatedly pointed to for years.

 

Can you can link me where the fact that 97% of climatologists are certainly being "scammed" or are "scamming" was debunked?

 

What do they all say?

That man contributes


5%

10%

25%

50%

75%

100%



Come on what do they all agree on?

 

Can you link me the names of these 97% climatologists?


.

 

Reviewers

Dr. Harold H. Doiron
Retired VP-Engineering Analysis and Test Division, InDyne, Inc.
Ex-NASA JSC, Aerospace Consultant
B.S. Physics, University of Louisiana � Lafayette
M.S., Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston

Dr. Theodore R. Eck
Ph.D., Economics, Michigan State University
M.A, Economics, University of Michigan
Fulbright Professor of International Economics
Former Chief Economist of Amoco Corp. and Exxon Venezuela
Advisory Board of the Gas Technology Institute and Energy Intelligence Group

Dr. Craig D. Idso
Chairman, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change
Ph.D., Geography, Arizona State University
M.S., Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
B.S., Geography, Arizona State University

Dr. Richard A. Keen
Instructor Emeritus of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado
Ph.D., Geography/Climatology, University of Colorado
M.S., Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado
B.A., Astronomy, Northwestern University

Dr. Anthony R. Lupo
IPCC Expert Reviewer
Professor, Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri
Ph.D., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University
M.S., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University

Dr. Thomas P. Sheahen
Ph.D., Physics, M.I.T.
B.S., Physics, M.I.T.

Dr. George T. Wolff
Former Chair EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Ph.D., Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University
M.S., Meteorology, New York University
B.S., Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology

http://principia-scientific.org/co2-caused-global-warming-invalidated-conclusively/

 

Who cares what scammers agree on?

 

Please don't confuse them with facts.

 

The figure comes from a survey of 14,000. 8000 of that 14000 refused to say man was causing warming. They were thrown out, and the remaining 4000 that say man is causing it were surveyed. How the heck it didn't come back 100% beats me. So, 97% of those who say man is causing GW, answered a survey on it. The 8000 who do not say man is causing GW were ignored.

The numbers are BS, as are all the numbers the Cult tries to push on the public.

 

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

 

I am not to sort out BS.

Was there one who pointed that GW (not AGW but GW) is a total scam?

If not then 100% are are certainly being "scammed" or are "scamming".

 

From your link:

Most importantly, the 97% consensus derived from abstract ratings is validated by the authors of the papers studied who responded to our survey (N = 2142 papers) and also reported a 97% consensus in papers taking a position.


There ya go. They only surveyed people who say man is causing GW. All the others who say it hasn't been proven are ignored. How "sciencey".

 

I understand what you are saying.

I have no argument against what you are saying.

Do you understand what I am saying?

I am not to sort out BS.

Was there one who pointed that GW (not AGW but GW) is a total scam?

If not then 100% are are certainly being "scammed" or are "scamming".

 

Believers in GW (man made or not man made) stepped back to 0.2C, now the paper does not give them even that.

Where is warming?

Nowhere.

Total fake.

 

The totally legitimate climate scientists were all swept away by Al Gore's rising tides, hence only the frauds and hucksters are left...

Nothing kills a hoax like decades of false predictions...

 

They probably believe the earth is flat too because its been debunked as often as that failed claim.

 

I am not sure even that can kill the hoax.

Al Gore just rode a wave.

Ozone depletion hoax successfully lined up many pockets before him.

It is more like a change in the fabric of American society.

Orwell's 1984.

 

I think most intelligent people have long since rejected the hoax. The saddest part is that so much of the hoax originated in colleges and universities and provided tons of funding, which not only perpetuated the hoax, but created a huge incentive to 'teach' the hoax to create a false legitimacy amongst the unsuspected students. Unfortunately many innocent students were brainwashed by illegitimate professors who where just soaking the system for 'research' grants...

 

There are photos of the melting glaciers, the warming is documented. This thread is just another RW circle jerk for political purposes.