Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Lee Harvey Oswald Did Not Act Alone

I must say this is an entertaining discussion.

(sorry to interrupt, please continue)

 

At least you know you’re full of prunes.

 

Can't help yourself can you? At least I was being polite, you're just a hopeless immature troll. Are you saying you don't believe the Warren Commission and their report?

 

In your face liar
you are the dishonest lair here and that is proven and you know ****ing know it.

 

Not the part of Oswald being just a guy who wanted a place in History and having no tie to a government. Obviously, he did.

 

Here is a pro tip little boy.

Why not do this? Instead of lodging your humorous tantrum for the 10th time like you’re doing now; just post the numbers you say you posted about:

The number of Americans who defected to Russia in the early 1960’s (from America obviously)
The number of Americans (from America obviously) who defected to Russia THEN were able to defect back in the 1960’s with their wives in tow.

You say you posted them.
We both know you didn’t.

If you could re-post them here, it would prove I’m lying. But we both know you can’t because you didn’t know what you’re talking about in the first place.

C’mon, summon what little manhood you have and prove me wrong bitch.

 

So you think they LIED?

 

Already did and you read them and are now lying.

The coward is you little boy run along you got whipped

 

Wrong liar we both know i did post them.

We both know you read them.

We both know i rubbed your face in them

You are humiliated and you know it boy.

Just like every other man you have met you got bested and beaten by one and now you can only cry like the whore I MADE you into

 

As predicted by yours truly…the troll is left only with insults and accusations. He could post what he says he already did….but of course, he’s lying about it.

 

I think they made a decision to not go down the rabbit hole because they knew where it would go.

Okay, you can dig deeper and find that Oswald was certainly active with the Soviet Union—he defected there. Some say he immigrated but most would call it a defection. DE-FECT-ION. he he he. Obviously, he was active with Cuba. Now did Nikita or Fidel order Oswald to shoot the President? Don’t know. But I don’t think it would matter to the American public. If they find out that he’s a puppet of either place, the outcry would likely be for full scale warfare. You can’t just let your leader get slaughtered by another nation. Of course, when the other nation has nukes pointed at you and the stakes are as high as they were in the 1960’s, the only way the war ends is in mushroom clouds over major cities. There is no other way for it to go.

So LBJ or whomever has a decision to make. The Commission could have thought; if we keep asking questions and find out he was acting on behalf of a government or even the appearance of acting on the behalf of a government; if we report that; WWIII is on our doorstep. Or if we just put Oswald out to pasture, everyone wakes up tomorrow. Or someone could have told Warren…”are you sure you want to go there?” Once you do, there is no going back.

 

Well in fact had you bothered to read it you would know that the Warren Commission did explore and exhaust all of those possibilites and found NO evidence.

No one calls it a defection because it was not one period and that is fact not opinion.

He was not active with Cuba he tried to emigrate there and they turned him down

 

So you think they lied then, it's a yes or no question.

 

I think they made the best decision they could have made given the circumstances.

 

In other words you don't have the stones to admit you believe they LIED. It's just one more reason why any adult discussion with you is a waste of time.

 

Gee, you mean we're not going to have our chats any longer? Boo hoo

 

Just to expand on the answer a bit...I'm not sure anyone "lied" in the Warren Commission. I think they made a decision to not open some doors that should have been open; I say that in terms of doing their jobs as investigators. I think they did their jobs as Statesmen.

Oswald is as guilty as the day is long. His antics after the shooting report absolutely nothing but guilt. His story before it report either the greatest series of coincidences and simultaneously the greatest example of incompetence on the part of a national security apparatus to befall a society in the history of multi-celled organisms or a conspiracy. So blaming Oswald for the assassination is not only proper, it is correct. But I doubt it is the whole story.

I think someone in the Commission on a weekend entertained some of their fellow members and over some brandies and cigars just maybe said out loud on their lanai..."ya know, if we find out that the Russians or Cubans were behind this, we have no choice but to go to war with them" and just let that thought hang there for a while. Everyone knew what that would mean; thermonuclear war. Keeping the doors to who was behind Oswald allowed life to move on in the nation and, yes, the world.

 

It's ok, you can make up any story you want to try to get around verbalizing your own belief that they LIED. The similarities between the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission are quite obvious, even to you (although you're obviously in denial). The only difference between the two (as "investigations") is that the members of the latter publicly admitted they published a bunch of lies.

 

Yet you can quote no inaccuracy in either one.

 

Like the "magic bullet"? The gaping exit wound in the back of John Kennedy's skull? http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/5017529-74/wecht-commission-specter

The Warren Commission report is riddled with inconsistencies and lies. http://www.npr.org/2013/11/10/243981006/inconsistencies-haunt-official-record-of-kennedys-death

To say they covered up the true nature of the coup of a sitting president in order to avoid a war with a foreign nation is a bit of imaginative
bulllshit that cannot possibly be justified.

 

Quote the inaccuracy in the report… If you can.

 

Try looking at the post already provided for that very purpose. That's what it was there for (not that you will acknowledge it).
Of course there is also the masterful video I already provided, which you refused to look at (Agent Oswald...CIA Patsy).
So I've done my part and provided my facts.

I'm not sure what your game is. It certainly isn't unraveling the coup against our president.

 

The magic bullet is not found anywhere in the wc.

Tha magic bullet is a fictional story about the wc created by conspiracy theorists. It is a lie about what the WC said.

The gaping hole is not proof of a lie so what proof do you have other than failed attempts you have made?

 

You mean the exact words "magic bullet" are found nowhere in the Warren Report?
That's true.

What's also true is the theory of that single bullet, that changed course, smashed through two bodies
and sustained virtually no loss of mass or exhibited any deformation, defying all science and ballistics experience, was formulated by the Warren Commission (Arlen Specter gets most of the credit) That's a massive lie, a bizarre invention and a trap the Warren Commission set for itself by insisting that one man fired three shots at the Kennedy limousine that day in Dallas.

The exit wound in the back of Kennedy's skull is, of course, also proof positive of the shot from the front of the motorcade that went through
the president's skull.

 

Wrong .

Not just the exact words but the description you give is NO WHERE to be found in the WC.

They never stated it changed course nor did it have to when striking the two men. The fact is bullets can hit to people causing multiple wounds it is not a consistent phenomenon but it is not unheard of either and striking to people causing multiple wounds is in no way magical or abnormal.

It defied no science but perfectly followed the laws of physics. Since you always evade this question I will ask you again WHICH law of physics did it defy?

It is an outright lie that it was lacking deformation it was deformed and missing mass consistent with having cause the wounds that it did.

Wrong the gaping wound is not proof positive of a frontal shot particularly since no wound was found on the front of the head which your spin would require,

What evidence do you have since you have failed to provide any?

What lie was told by the WC ?