Ronald Reagan's Mark on History

The whole blog which is just opinions.

Take Chomsky for example.

Despite his renown as a brilliant man he is a proven hypocrite and liar he merely spouts jingoistic OPINION without evidence.

All of your sources offer no opinion but merely claim expertise which any one can do.

You have no evidence for any of the claims on your blog THAT IS FACT.

It is extremist hate speech and nothing more

 

He's not part of the evidence. Just commentary.

So I guess I should never read "extremist" Human Rights Watch again or take any Congressional report seriously. That goes for the Economist as well. Amnesty International was conning us this whole time, right? So then who owns the "facts" as you see them? What is credible?

You are in 'la la lu lu', sir.

 

None of those specific sources offers evidence to support your claims.

It isyou in a land of confusion you are brainwashed to believe that agreement equals evidence

 

Be specific.

 

I was specific

 

You're a flake. Beat it.

 

You hate reality but I will stay here and put it in your face

- - - Updated - - -

You hate reality but I will stay here and put it in your face

 

JFK + Executive Order 11110

[video=youtube;OXHyFUXvGAk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXHyFUXvGAk[/video]

 

Yeah.... I'm not watching your video. Executive Order 11110 allowed the Treasury Department to issue Silver certificates. Pretty riveting stuff. I can see why that got Lee Harvey Oswald so riled up.

 

Oswald was just a patsy who conveniently got killed before he could speak a word. Besides that, he never could have taken the shot from that building and Kennedy moved back on impact of the bullet, in stead of forwards if he got shot from behind.

Here, have a listen to Bill Hicks:

[video=youtube;8aaqN7SqLpU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aaqN7SqLpU[/video]

 

You do realize that Kennedy was wearing a back brace, right? And that there was no place a shooter could have been located in front of the motorcade? The Grassy Knoll was off to the right, and if Kennedy was shot from there, Jackie would have been hit by fragments of the bullet that passed through his head. The only other people that were injured were Governor Connolly and James Teague and they were both in front of Kennedy, so that's a pretty clear indication to me that all of the shots came from the rear.

Anyway, this is all ridiculous and waaaaay off the subject of this thread.

 

JFK - The Speech That Killed Him

[video=youtube;utYcFf93Srs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utYcFf93Srs[/video]

 

The only speech that led to President Kennedy's death was the one he was on his way to give at the Dallas Trade Mart.

 

Check:

 

I don't know how many times and how many ways I can say this, but I'm not clicking on any of your links or videos. If you can't make a legitimate argument for yourself, maybe you should spend a little less time watching and posting links and a little more time actually reading and educating yourself.

 

Ah, so you're one of those guys... "I won't look at any videos or links, because I already know what's best."

Trust me, I can argument you to kingdom-come if I want, but a short vid or a link would be way faster to get the message across, as I need something called "back-up" for the claims I make.

Good thing you haven't become a judge, because it wouldn't be really fair to wipe any evidence off the table in order to come to a verdict purely based on 'hear-say' right?

 

*LOL* If I was a Judge and you were a lawyer, and you came in and didn't say a word.... just put in the DVD and started playing a video without making an argument to how it is relevant to your case, you're darn right I wouldn't allow it.

The way this is supposed to work is that you make an argument - you put forward your case and present any supporting evidence you want - with reference to it's relevance and context, and then I can decide for myself whether I want to follow it up or not. I'm not some puppy dog who's going to go chasing after every stick you decide to throw into the woods. No matter how good your videos are, they probably aren't interactive - I can't debate with them. If you can't explain to me why I should watch it, then why would I waste my time?

 

Well, I did make the argument that JFK was killed due to a massive conspiracy right? And put some evindence there along with it. Got some more if you want, but hey.. since you won't be looking at any vids or links, it would be an endless discussion anyway, since you already made up your mind about it.

Anyway, maybe you'll get to find the following interesting, like for example the "stand-down" order which was given right before he drove up to "Elm-street"

[video=youtube;XY02Qkuc_f8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8[/video]

Now what the hell was that stand-down order good for right before JFK received the kill-shot?


Besides that, Kennedy was killed in Dallas which lies at the 33rd parallel (if you look at the world map); 33rd degree is the highest degree in Freemasonry.



Most US presidents were Freemasons.

You also going to brush that of as a 'coincedence' ?

 

stands up and gives standing ovation.could not have said it better myself. yeah this OP is so much in denial about Reagan that he only sees what he WANTS to see about him. Reagan was obviously a distant cousin of his the way he takes it so personal when his hero is exposed for the traiter and mass murderer he was going into meltdown mode when he cannot refute the facts on him.

- - - Updated - - -

amen to that.that is so obvious.lol

- - - Updated - - -

amen to that.that is so obvious.lol

 

as always you know your stuff and you took him to school major big time.

- - - Updated - - -

you nailed it.

- - - Updated - - -

best damn post on this thread,bat none.

 

Alright... I'm going to keep a straight face.

Dallas is actually on the 32nd parallel..... if "they" wanted to shoot him at the 33rd parallel, they should have done it up in Plano instead. Or maybe the shooters were from the second-highest degree of masonry? That'd make sense, wouldn't it? I figure if the top guys were giving the order, they'd give it to the next-lower guys, and where else could they do it besides the same parallel where they were numbered?

 

yeah we are off to conspiracy land because what he posted is conspiracy FACT. and as far as the question goes,uh duh,do your research. The thing that was different about Kennedy than all the other presidents we have had since then is because of TWO things I can think of immediately off the top of my head and they are the main reasons why he was killed and WHY all the other presidents since then have all stayed alive.

1. He was going to get rid of the federal reserve. 5 months before his assassination he signed an executive order that basically was going to get rid of the federal reserve because our money was backed by silver for fives months after he signed it.

Our money was actually worth something for that short period of time since it was backed by something where now our money is not backed by anything so it is about as worthless as monopoly money. For five months our money that was distributed said UNITED STATES NOTES on them they did not say federal reserve notes like they do now. I know people that still have some of the dollars that got distributed back then that kept them. After Kennedy was murdered,LBJ stepped in and immediately stopped the printing of the united states notes.

2.He had cut off aide to Israel.Israel is the major reason the world is in the mess that it is today starting wars in the middle east.Every president since LBJ has given aide to Israel.

Oh and Reagan was also a traiter to americans because as governor of California,he was instrumental in blocking an extradition request by Jim Garrison to subpeona Allen Dulles. Ford got rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup on the warren commission so did Reagan for his participation in the coverup.

carter was the last DECENT president we had.Like JFK carter ALSO tried to take steps to get rid of the CIA.When he got in office,he immediately cleaned house by firing evil monster George Bush who is linked to the assassination and hired Stansfield Turner who immediately took steps to reform the CIA cleaning house getting rid of all CIA covert operations. Then when Reagan got in office,the CIA of course went back to their corruption with Reagan dismissing Turner and bringing in William Casey who got the CIA back to its corruption getting the CIA back to their covert operations they still are doing now.
you have learned something after being taken to school now.

They did not assassinate Carter like they did kennedy because they knew the next election was going to be rigged for Reagan to win and that Carter was on his way out. the last halfway decent president we had carter to no surprise only served in office one term.

Good presidents never serve in office longer than one term. Bush sr is the exception but that was because he was actually running the country most the time while he was VP under Reagan since Reagan had alzheimers.since he had already been president for 8 years pretty much,he was ready to step down and let his pal Bill Clinton be the new president.

 

well said,thats what many people dont understand is corruption in government goes on DESPITE the efforts of a president to stop it.That just because it goes on,doesnt mean it has the presidents blessing.Carter was kept out of the loop on that same as how JFK was kept out of the loop by many of the covert wars the CIA was running back then. good job of taking him to school there.

 

thats what everybody finds out that tries to discuss that with him.He is the same as the OP here is with reagan on JFK.He ignores any facts that shread to pieces the warren commission.thank god for the ignore list.

 

It's not exactly on the 33rd parallel, but it's very close to it:



Besides that, the logo of the Freemasons, which is on the backside of every 1-dollar bill is a pyramid with an "all seeing eye" above it.






If you look at the map where Kennedy was shot, it also resembles a pyramid:



So... still don't think anything 'fishy' is going on there?