Russian Collusion & AG Barr Cover Up

This is it in a nutshell.

If he doesn't advance our agendas, we will commit any fraud in order to remove him.

 

Oh my, still getting Russian collusion #FakeNews stories from the #FakeNews media?

 

It's incredible that people are still pushing that hoax. Most have moved to the obstruction hoax.

I think their tryout of a coverup hoax didn't gain any traction. So, there's that.

 

Yeah the collusion hoax & the obstruction hoax is all part of the same hoax. Either one ends up here in my dead end #RussianCollusionHoax conspiracy theory thread.

 

And back to the Russian collusion hoax thread again.

 

Lol so you're not really contesting that Barr-Barian completely distorted the meaning of the Mueller report by selecting out it's more significant passages in favor of less significant ones . and by distorting the the entire meaning of it's conclusion.

. Corrupted Bill Barr sent unsolicited letters to our criminal President stating that he would protect him and take care of him weeks before he was selected for AG..and he will soon be held in contempt of Congress for defying the constitution. Since your moral compass leads you to admire and support officials who defy the constitution and show contempt for the American people why would you worry about something like exculpatory language.?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/barrs-conclusions-are-undercut-by-his-lack-of-familiarity-with-details-of-muellers-probe/ar-AAAMqR3?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=spartandhp
“Sen. Kamala D. Harris questioned Barr at the hearing after the redacted report was released: “My question is,” she continued, “in reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?”

“No, we took — we accepted — ” Barr said.

“Did Mr. Rosenstein?” Harris interjected.

“We accepted the statements in the report as the factual record,” Barr said. “We did not go underneath it to see whether or not they were accurate, we accepted it as accurate. It made our — ”

“So you accepted the report as the evidence?” Harris asked. Yes, Barr replied.

Barr twisted Mueller's statements in the Mueller Report to the point of being almost unrecognizable

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/nadler-responsibility-now-falls-to-congress-to-hold-the-president-accountable-1499001411607
"HOUSE JUDICAIRY CHAIR REACTS TO MUELLER REPORT.
MSNBC REPORT 4-18-19

"Barr: stated in his corrupted version of Muellers Report ‘that while this report does not conclude the President committed a crime It also does not exonerate him. But Barr deliberately ignored the two sentences before that line.

If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would say so. Base on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgement. Mueller went on to say that a thorough FBI investigation would have uncovered facts about the campaign and the President personally that the president could have understood to be crimes or that would have risen to personnel and considerable concern. For some reason Barr excluded this critical finding as well from his version of events. .Barr has refused to work with the committee and to which the Judiciary committed is entitled".[/QUOTE]​

 

wrong here's what you said on your post with false stats

​

Thus because you claim without proof that the Clinton polls were false it gives you license to screw your fellow posters with false polls

 

[/QUOTE]

You must not be aware of what an AG does. You think the AG is supposed to do the Special Counsel's job? Fascinating. Now that some of the underlying evidence IS coming out due to the court, it turns out that the Mueller team has twisted the meaning at least 5 times now to make it look worse.

 

Don't you just love the sound of liberal tears falling?

Comes in a close second to liberal souls being crushed and hopes lost.

 

I never said or implied this and you don't have the guts to prove otherwise. Isn't It interesting how our sick Don operates. When he gets desperate he attacks others in vengence by putting words in their mouths they never used or thought.

Same unproven garbage. Corrupted Bill Barr sent unsolicited letters to our criminal President stating that he would protect him and take care of him weeks before he was selected for AG and he will soon be held in contempt of Congress for defying the constitution. Trump's white house lawyer Don McGann admitted to Mueller that Trump wanted him to fire Mueller and then state falsely to the press that it was never Trump's idea. . Since your moral compass leads you to admire and support officials who defy the constitution and show contempt for the American people why would you worry about something like exculpatory language.?

 

You were given substantial evidence on post 246. Just because you hate the truth doesn't mean it's not the truth.

 

The only fraud here is Trump. The vast majority of Londoners were protesting and jeering him. Once again Trump shows his
contempt for the American people by mis-informing them and lying to them,

 

.This never happened again. Please show me the direct quote of Mueller's in the report that says he is vindicated. One again we have a President who show's contempt for the American people by supplying a false narrative about the Mueller report. There was no exoneration of Trump what-so -ever in Mueller's report. That's why you're afraid to supply a direct quote from Mueller saying Trump is vindicated.

This is total B.S. Now Trump's lackey Barr-barion will be held in contempt of congress. Barr shows us over and over the contempt he has for our constitution and the fact that he thinks the AG also serves as Trump's personal attorney
QUOTE FROM MUELLER IN HIS REPORT:
"If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would say so. Base on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgement. Mueller went on to say that a thorough FBI investigation would have uncovered facts about the campaign and the President personally that the president could have understood to be crimes or that would have risen to personnel and considerable concern."

 

A completer pile of B.S. The president was never ever exonerated in the Mueller report. The president who will lie and abuse the American people in an effort to mis-inform themis similar to the old soviet style.

Ever wonder why this poster has never show a direct quote from the Mueller report acquitting Trump there is none

From the Mueller report: If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would say so. Base on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgement. Mueller went on to say that a thorough FBI investigation would have uncovered facts about the campaign and the President personally that the president could have understood to be crimes or that would have risen to personnel and considerable concern. If anyone's wondering AG Barr-barrion will soon be held in contempt of congress.

 

Thanks for proving my point you have no clue. You are also completely clueless about the law and what the AG can and cannot do.

 

Once again you simply attack the poster when you can't muster the facts to prove anything you posit in your posts. You support a corrupt AG who doesn't know what he can and cannot do which is why he is facing contempt of congress charges. You unflinchingly support a President who violates the law the constitution and the American people all at the same time.

Trumps pathological mantra: anything unfavorable about him is 100% fake news without exception.

 

Again, thanks for proving my point over and over. Fun to watch.

You should read up on the law, you might learn something. For instance, Barr CANNOT release grand jury testimony. That is the law that the democrats want Barr to break. You say his is corrupt yet he is following the law and even did much more than he needed to. He had no obligation, by the law, to release anything to Congress except whether there was an indictment or not. So Barr goes way beyond what he had to do and released the redacted report to Congress and the left calls him crooked. So the dems whine and gnash their teeth because Barr only released 99.5% of the report so Barr un-redacted the classified information for the Intelligence Committee, the only ones allowed to review that and the dems whine and gnash their teeth again saying Barr is hiding something while refusing to review the new information.

So the laws for Grand Jury Secrecy now apply and Barr CANNOT release it. Only a court can and the dem clown show knows this. The dem clown show cannot force Barr to break the laws they passed so their contempt of congress charges are ludicrous (and they also know this) so this is all political clown show for the useful idiots for 2020.

 

You're wrong. During the Nixon investigation Grand Jury testimony was given to congress by Judge John Sirica because when your president acts like a criminal you simply have to and the constitution gives congress the absolute right to investigate the president, subpoena documents and demand testimony.. You don't understand the constitution, past precedent, and the separation of powers. You believe that the president is above the law period.
.

Your sad ignorance leads you to recite the Administrations talking points. Barr was dishonest from the start. Barr assured the president that he would help him in any way he could by sending letters to him 20 days before he was selected AG. The letters stated that Mueller's notions of obstruction of justice were fatally flawed. The report hadn't been released yet. No AG in our history has ever done this and his actions were fundamentally corrupt. Corrupt Barr should have recused himself because this was in conflict of interest.

Pure talking points much of it word for word. When Barr received the Mueller Report he completely mis-quoted it in such a way that it would allow him tod declare Trump innocent of all charges. Since you've barely read a word of the report let me help you.

"Barr: stated in his corrupted version of Muellers Report ‘that while this report does not conclude the President committed a crime It also does not exonerate him. But Barr deliberately ignored the two sentences before that line. And went on to declare Trump clear of all charges.
The 2 most important lines in the report according to Mueller:
'If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would say so. Base on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgement. Mueller went on to say that a thorough FBI investigation would have uncovered facts about the campaign and the President personally that the president could have understood to be crimes or that would have risen to personnel and considerable concern."
If you don't believe this google it but I can see you've never read the report because your response to It is knee Jerk talking points.

Ignorance! As I've said before grand Jury information has been released in the past when a judge believes it is central to a case. Your overused cliché talking points lead to the blind mantra that "the President is above the law'. You're not very bright on all this because all your blind talking points would prevent the Congress from fulfilling its constitutional mandate to investigate a very corrupt criminal oriented President. Of course congress has the constitutional right to hold corrupt Barr in contempt and will do so shortly.

 

You are even unaware that the counsel investigating Nixon worked for Congress and not the AG. Different law. You keep proving my point about your own lack of knowledge.

 

Yes, again thanks for repeating my point. Barr cannot release grand jury information as the dem clown show wants to hold him in contempt for. It is up to a judge.

Speaking of ignorance, no prosecutor exonerates anyone.

 

I've proven that your ignorance completely clouds your judgement. You can't talk about this without discussing congress' stake in all this. In fact corrupt Barr will soon be in contempt of congress by denying it's constitutional right to have him testify. Our criminal oriented President is defying congress' constitutional right to receive documents and have witnesses testify which is also obstruction of justice. You really don't know which way is up. Again read up on the constitution, the separation of powers and maybe take a look at the Mueller report before saying such ignorant things.

 

Mueller could have recommended further investigation. And thank you for not contesting in the least that Criminal oriented President Trump committed obstruction in the Mueller report and is showing further obstruction with his contempt for Congress, the American people and the constitution. Corrupt Barr is on the way to being charged with contempt of congress.

Mueller clearly said " "If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would say so. Base on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgement. Mueller went on to say that a thorough FBI investigation would have uncovered facts about the campaign and the President personally that the president could have understood to be crimes or that would have risen to personnel and considerable concern.
Your posts are purposely misleading since you are afraid to include Mueller's most important quotes in your posts