San Bernardino school shooter fired 10 shots, reloaded once

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/11/us/san-bernardino-school-shooting/

This story was form 2 days ago. Funny how a school shooting perpetrated by a black man with a revolver drops from the national media's radar so quickly.

Still waiting for someone to tell us how California's draconian gun laws failed to stop this, and what new law would.

 

Never too early to attack gun control. The bodies are not even in the ground yet

 

There has to be one, right? They should just keep adding more laws until they find it.

 

It's worked this far, why not keep going?

Stories like this die off as soon as the left realizes it does not fit their current narrative.

 

If Obama was still president, there would have been an immediate televised condemnation of the GOP, the NRA and gun owners and a renewed appeal for increasing gun control before the barrel of the gun had cooled with tears for the fallen school children stoking emotions..the Never let an egregious/horrible crime to waste leftist strategy.

 

There will be a call to limit the number of rounds in revolvers....to 1?

 

Indeed -- the anti-gun side prays every night to wake to the news of a shooting the next day -- what better means to push an unthinking and nonsensical agenda than the blood of innocent children.

 

The pro gun side jumped on this incident before the bodies got cold

 

The revolver aspect of this story is why there is no one in the media is clamoring for gun control. This doesn't fit the narrative.

 

I saw just the opposite.

 

I am all for preventing such tragedies, but blaming guns and attacking 2A rights is not the answer. By doing so, the result preempts pursuing an understanding of the causal underlying problem.
I have owned many guns, not one has voiced violent thoughts in my head.

 

I refer you to the OP

 

And he states a very good question.

 

Yes he sure did jump right in on this incident with his pro gun position

 

So why didn't California's extreme gun laws stop this?

 

Because those laws are not national. I live in Vegas about 3 hours from this place. ANYONE can get almost ANY gun they want here

 

ANYONE must be breaking the law then.

 

And it is incredibly easy to do so

 

Correct!!!!!
So new laws will be incredibly easy to break too.

Laws don't stop anyone from doing anything.
The willingness for the public to comply or not is why they work or dont.

 

I disagree completely. The reason people would come to vegas is it is harder to get those same guns in California

 

And if they take them back to California they are criminals. It's their choice to comply with the law or not.

 

And we make it incredibly easy to do so

 

But all you are doing is parroting your cause...LOL you haven't proposed one thing that would of stopped it nor will you...to control crime you have to remember the old saying....it ain't the gun stupid!

 

Someone point out to the member Vegas Giants that the revolver in question was purchase in the state of California, and thus subject to the laws regulating firearms within the state of California. Therefore national level firearm-related restrictions would have made no difference.

 

Noted