Sanctioned Russian Bank Confirms Executives Met with Trump Son-In-Law Jared Kushner

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-son-law-testify-executives-sanctioned-russian-bank-575069

This is a previously undisclosed meeting. And Kushner has volunteered to be interviewed by the Senate Intelligence Committee as part of the panel's investigation into Russia's interference during the 2016 election. This is also the same Jared Kushner that has been appointed by Donald Trump to effectively do everything - from reforming and making the Government more efficient to forging a peace deal in the mideast - despite having zero political experience.

 

And.....Podesta's brother met Executives with a Russian Sanctioned Bank and took money from them all to get around BO peeps sanctions. Podestas Brother being a money bundler for Hillary.

 

Between Jared Kushner and John Podesta's Brother, which one had an official position with the campaign? Which one currently has a position in the White House?

Like a Dog Around a Squirrel.

 

Perhaps you missed the Podesta's emails to Hillary and the DNC during the campaign?

 

How in the holy **** is that relevant to the topic of this thread?

 

Are you saying John Podesta brother didn't have an official position with the campaign being Hillarys money bundler. While his Brother was her Chairman of her campaign.

Tell us how John wouldn't be in her WH. Tell us how his brother wouldn't have been given a spot in her Administration.

Have you figured out that it is not illegal to talk to the Russians whether one is a Democrat or A Republican?

 

I will not respond to your questions because you have made zero posts about the topic of this thread. If you want to discuss John Podesta, his brother, or Hillary Clinton, then you can make your own thread.

 

If that went over your head I can't help you.

 

I am perfectly capable of understanding the content of the words that you used. I fail to understand why you think John Podesta's emails to Hillary Clinton are relevant to Jared Kushner's previously undisclosed, but now confirmed, meeting with a sanctioned Russian Bank.

 

You have still not posted a single sentence, let alone a single post, about the topic of the thread. Reported.

 

Are bank executives Russian officials?

 

The Podesta's are also known for their sophisticated taste in art. Many leftist aspire to achieve such collections.

 

Yes I did....when I equated it to the same thing that the Podesta Brothers were doing. Although the Podesta were helping Putin and his boys get around the Peeps Sanctions.

Trumps son in law.....wasn't. Moreover he met with all kinds of People from overseas.

 

The stench of corruption from this regime grows stronger with every day.
I think it is a shorter list to say who in the Trump campaign DIDN'T meet with the Russians.
What possible LEGITIMATE reason could there be for meeting with a Russian bank under sanctions?

 

When the bank is this large and this connected to the upper eschalons of the Russian government, it's a tough distinction to make. But Kushner did also meet with the Russian ambassador and arranged the meetings between the ambassador and several Trump campaign officials.

 

Probably a similar reason Russian Uranium company's gave the Clinton Foundation huge donations.

 

Why are you posting something irrelevant to the topic of this thread?

Like a Dog around a Squirrel.

 

Well, at least in this post you referenced Trump's son-in-law, aka the topic of this thread.

Seriously? You think that they met with Kushner without trying to persuade Trump, the most pro-Russian candidate in modern history, to erase sanctions against them?

Sanctions like the sanctions that were supposedly not discussed (but they were) over the phone between Flynn and the Russian Ambassador?

 

We were talking about leftist icon Jon (I like giant paintings of little kids in their underwear chained to walls) Podesta talking to the Russians too.

 

And what does that have to do with Jared Kushner testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee about a previously undisclosed, but now confirmed, meeting with a sanctioned Russian Bank?

 

Aren't there ANY republicans who put country before party?
Is winning and holding power EVERYTHING?
Is there no depth that is too low to stoop to?
Are they all like Nunes - protect those who collude with the Russians for the sake of a political party?
The amount of circumstantial evidence about collusion is becoming overwhelming - some might be innocent, but ALL OF IT?

I personally do not believe Trump will allow the Russians to attack America - but Western Europe?, sure, for enough money, or for keeping secret "dirt" we know the Russians must have hacked from GOP computers - keeping it out of Wikileaks hands, as long as Trump "cooperates".

 

Interesting to see how the libs try to control the conversation to stay right inside their agenda or else it falls apart.

 

Are you referring to the democrat party? Cause it sure sounds exactly like the democrat party and wouldn't surprise me in the least to see the lib painting the right with their agenda. When has a democrat never been party first? Holding power is all the left have been about "Control". Circumstantial evidence is a liberal fact.

 

It's not. Trump Chumps are desperate to divert attention away from Trump's Russo-phile inner-circle.

 

Yes you don't get it.