Sandy Hook massacre never happened

That's been addressed ad nauseum by both the parents of the child, and the press. You are doing nothing but spamming at this point, and if that is the only evidence you have to hang your hat on, then what does that say about your "case"?

 

CBS, NBC, CNN.... so said main stream media? They only report what the government want you to know but censor their unfavorite. I try to let people know the information not reported by those media. That's why the Feds activate the accessaries like you to slander.

If this is a hoax, no others could do it except the Feds because so many resources were activated: poice, media, government officials and informants (some were called as "actors" by people.) And they of course would let out disinformation to meddle the water.
This is a doctored picture. Madeline and Samantha have no legs in the photo.



And they deliberately let Madeline wearing Emilie's dress in photo with Obama. At the purpose to confusing people then to prove the suspicious people are "conspiracy theorist". Remember, no others have the motive and resource to do that. Those who could take pictures of Obama and Samantha have the privilege or that photo was a product of the "strategy office"(disinformation office) too.

 

Oh, and more bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that's been addressed ad nauseum. Don't you EVER get sick of this? And you guys love to call other peoples shills that slander, don't you? I suppose it's easier than just admitting you have no idea what you're talking about.

Of course you use "alternative" media. They're the ONLY ones that actually agree with you guys. It's easier, for you, to lie about the real world than address it.

 

Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

By Cavan Sieczkowski - 1/16/2013

Conspiracy theories surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have reached a new level with a viral "truther" video that has been viewed by millions of people in just one week. However, experts in conspiracy theory have debunked the video as a mere marketing trade on questions, not answers.

On Jan. 7, the video titled "The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed" was posted to the YouTube channel ThinkOutsideTheTV, where it garnered more than 8.6 million views in just nine days. The 30-minute video uses news clips to point out "inconsistencies" in the Sandy Hook coverage.

The video opens with a disclaimer: "This is a simple, logical video. No aliens, holigrams [sic], rituals or anything like that, just facts."

"The video begins with something that really everybody can accept -- 'We are just raising questions,'" Benjamin Radford, author of "Media Mythmakers" and deputy editor of the Skeptical Inquirer, told The Huffington Post. "The whole subject is framed like, 'Don't look at us, we're not saying this crazy stuff, we're just asking questions.'"

But that's all the video is -- just questions.

"All they offer are tantalizing 'could be's," Radford said.

"The classic conspiracy theorist sees the hidden hand in everything. Nothing is as it seems," he added. "There's something bigger that's going on. They dont know where it is, but they are willing to tantalize people and throw out any number of suggestions, which are oftentimes contradictory."

David Mikkelson, founder of myth-bunking site Snopes.com, agrees.

"In any kind of disaster or tragedy like this, if you go through things with a fine-toothed comb, you will find a number of contradictory statements," Mikkelson told HuffPost. "Of course, most of them are cleared up within a few days of the initial reporting, but it's not something you're going to see in these [conspiracy] videos."

Some questions posited by ThinkOutsideTheTV include:
How Adam Lanza's AR-15 rifle got locked in his trunk (later proven to be an extra shotgun);

If grieving Newtown citizens are really just "crisis actors" (targeted hero Gene Rosen is actually a retired psychologist);

Why memorial websites were seemingly set up before the shooting on Dec. 14 ("Google search result entries are imprecise and do not always accurately reflect the date on which the reference material first appeared on the web," notes Mikkelson on Snopes).
In addition, truthers have claimed that the victims' parents didn't express the proper level of grief. However, by cherry-picking certain portions of certain news clips, evidence to such claims becomes "beneath worthless and is actually misleading," Robert Blaskiewicz, writer for the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and co-editor of the blog Skeptical Humanities, said in an email to HuffPost. "Doing that means ignoring (or simply rejecting) vast quantities of evidence that doesn't support their conclusion."

Some truthers went as far as saying 6-year-old Emilie Parker, a victim of the shooting, later appears in a photo with the president.

"They'll see things that have double meanings," Radford said. "What the rest of us see [in that photo] is Emilie Parker's sister, but they're looking at the exact same photograph and they are interpreting it very differently."

"You can get a lot of mileage out of vague physical similarities," Mikkelson added.

Compiled together, this "evidence" not only addresses a theory, but also a much larger issue: Most conspiracy theorists have a very specific agenda, the experts said.

ThinkOutsideTheTV, for example, points to the notion that Sandy Hook could've been a scheme to disarm the American public and destroy the Second Amendment.

"What I think we are looking at in the video is an attempt to find evidence to fit a preexisting narrative, that the government is or is quickly becoming a tyranny and that the only thing stopping the government from terrorizing the nation is that the populace is armed," Blaskiewicz said.

Blaskiewicz added that such a diseased investigative process is almost always guaranteed to fail.

"The only possible answer at the end of that process of investigation is some sort of omnipotent puppet master who controls everything. In this case, it's the government, but it's often Jews, the New World Order, the other political party, the Illuminati, Masons, or even inter-dimensional mind-controlling reptilian space aliens who impersonate political leaders."

D.J. Grothe, president of the James Randi Educational Foundation, does note that truthers shouldn't be immediately dismissed as raving lunatics, however.

"Political conspiracy theorists are completely wrong [in their conclusions], but they're not crazy," he told HuffPost. "The leading conspiracy theorists ... are right on many of their initial factual claims. Depending on what the theory is, they might even be correct in all of their claims. Where they are wrong is connecting the dots that aren't there."

"We are hardwired to seek order in chaos, make meaning out of data noise, and it is paradoxically comforting to imagine that great tragedy is not just time and chance, but a function of some nefarious, pre-planned grand design," he added.

source link

 

The conspiracy theorists mantra "we're JAQ'ing"

 

Walking in Circles Around Sandy Hook Firehouse - Creating The Illusion of More

[video=youtube;ZrXPHwl11io]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrXPHwl11io&feature=player_detailpage [/video]


Watch how many informants they activated in a hoax. It might be a drill. Actors went into the house to check in or receiving instruction. They were monitored by helicopter, too.

 

how much more ridiculous can you be?

oh look another kooky video and outlandish explanation

 

ac·tor
noun \ˈak-tər also -ˌtȯr\







Definition of ACTOR


1

: one that acts : doer


2

a: one who represents a character in a dramatic production

b: a theatrical performer

c: one who behaves as if acting a part

3

: one that takes part in any affair

— ac·tor·ish adjective

— ac·tor·ly adjective


See actor defined for English-language learners »


See actor defined for kids »


Examples of ACTOR

<my sister went to drama school to become an actor>
<Benjamin Franklin was a major actor in many of the events leading up to the founding of our nation.>

 

That actor in firehouse, Rosen, works for FEMA.

Remember the pedobear, Gene Rosen. It's Eugene Rosen, FEMA rep. Notice where the NWO tried to take his name out of the old story when the People found out about it.



http://www.discussanything.com/foru...ntary-school?p=2369390&highlight=#post2369390

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/ind...ration_in_​Texas.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=89255677

 

You're genuinely disturbed....seek help.

 

Psychological control. The government monopolize the news release.

They beat the drum to report every shooting after Sandy Hook case, but neglect one if it won't benefit their goal.

 

if it was neglected, how do you know about it?

 

why don't you come to connecticut and see for yourself you creepy lowlife. instead of doing this, you could help share the pain.

 

Also, that story is moronic at best. It says the best thing is a "good person with a gun." No it's not, the best thing is a trained person with equipment they're familiar with. The shooter was obviously mentally retarded, which caused him to feel that killing his ex and several others was a resolution to the issue. He should have never had the gun to begin with, and tighter measures may have stopped it.

 

Camera man was threatened

[video=youtube;-Lv2WtaIxCg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lv2WtaIxCg&feature=player_embedded[/video]

 

You've got to be kidding...is this all you have?

 

He's the only one clinging to it still, as well. There aren't even other CTists here supporting him.

 

Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing



In a furious presentation of mixed words a Newtown resident lays out her thoughts during a Bipartisan Task Force Public Hearing.
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
February 5, 2013
NEWTOWN HIGH SCHOOL &#8212; In a strange twist of events, Susan McGuinness Getzinger (a local resident) has come forward regarding shady actions in the Connecticut school system.

The woman stated that her husband was killed in a fatal car accident the night after she protested local corruption at a previous public hearing.

The woman calls out the 3 top administrators of the Newtown School District and mentions a law firms involvement.

The woman states in the hearing, &#8220;You walk into your PPT or Educational Hearing, they are all in on it. The staff is told not to identify, they can&#8217;t pay their mortgage if they speak out against it. It&#8217;s wrong. Fix it. Dead Kid&#8217;s that&#8217;s the price got it?&#8221;.

The woman is rather scattered during her presentation, but goes on to end the presentation before being swiftly removed from the podium with, &#8220;Adam Lanza was the first victim cause he probably had medical problems, and the attorneys sealed the records!&#8221;.

A speaker cuts the woman off as she is whisked off stage.

(Clapping)
[video=youtube;woU1XaAc8E0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woU1XaAc8E0&feature=player_embedded[/video]

The woman also states that there were three schools in lockdown the day of the Sandy Hook School Shooting, but then never follows up on the statement in a manner that one can follow.

http://theintelhub.com/2013/02/06/b...sing-sandy-hook-corruption-at-public-hearing/

 

what a nut case

 

In this case, Adam Lanza and his mother, could be victims of the plot. Lanza had no motive to commit such a crime. Government has. They are pushing for a gun ban. It’s hard to ban all kinds of guns. So the first step is to ban the “Assault weapon”. That’s why they insisted that the gunman used a rifle. By common sense, it’s easy to use hand gun to shoot inside a building. It’s rare to see people use rifle to commit killing inside rooms when they have hand gun as choice.
------------------
Today Show - no rifles used in Newtown shooting.

[video=youtube;iGn4o1Lb6L0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGn4o1Lb6L0&feature=player_embedded [/video]

 

why aren't you ashamed to post such blatant lies?

 

In the feds thread Katsung47 signs his emails Kat Hak Sung.

Google Kat Hak Sung.

It's interesting.

 

Holeeeee crow!

 

Remarkable resemblance

2.

I took a screenshot (on Jan. 11, 2013) of her picture on Stars Color in case the site scrubs it in the days to come:

Here&#8217;s a picture of Jennifer Greenberg Sexton and her husband Richard Sexton (we don&#8217;t know when the photos were taken):[/QUOTE]

3.

James Holmes sits with defense attorney Tamara Brady during his arraignment. (AP)

 

your nut case assertions are pathetic