Sandy Hook massacre never happened

That's the question I should ask you, why aren't you ashamed to work as harasser for the government? How much tips you got from your job?

---------------

No others could do Sandy Hook massacre except the Feds because so many resources were activated: police, media, government officials and informants (some were called as "actors" by people.) And they of course would let out disinformation to meddle the water.

Robbie Parker was pushed out as a trap to discredit “Sandy Hook truthers”. Mr. Parker was selected because he has three look alike daughters, all with blonde hair and you can hardly recognize them if the picture was taken in a few years.

Here is a doctored picture. Madeline and Samantha have no legs in the photo. It was cut and replaced by other stuff. That two legs on bottom part is from another photo. The size and location does not fit Robbie Parker’s body.



And they deliberately let Madeline wearing Emilie's dress in photo with Obama. Let her in Emilie’s hair style in picture one too. The dress and hair style were designed to confusing people (that Emilie wasn’t dead) then to prove the suspicious people are "conspiracy theorist". Remember, no others have the motive and resource to do that. Those who could take pictures of Obama and Samantha have the privilege or that photo was a product of the "strategy office"(disinformation office) too.


---
That picture was created particularly to mislead people to conclude Emily hadn't died. (they let Madeline wear Emily's dress) That's a trap set up for suspicious people. It proves even the president could be obedient actor to be manipulated by the perpetrator. See how happy those actors are. Are they family members who just lost a lovely girl and after memory service, or it was a celebrating party?

 

is that supposed to make sense?

i'm an independent business owner and have never worked for any government

 

Government monopolized the news agency. They censored the important news of Sandy Hook shootings. Sandy Hook - Judge seals police records for 90 days. It helps to fume suspicion of people. Why did they release so much inconsistent information on Sandy Hook shooting?

Do you know why they released the following news (MANY 9-11 "HIJACKERS" ARE STILL ALIVE)? Because there are many people work for government as informants. They are afraid of becoming sacrifices when they were told to carry out a mission. So the late news (hijackers still alive) released to comfort them. Now we saw so many disinformation released later after Sandy Hook shooting. It hints "we didn't kill that many children". That's the trick how the government fool you the people.

 

you really have to be an idiot to believe that nonsense

 

(1) In January, I read a post about Emilie’s fund raising page. I went there and copied the page content then wrote the following: “Tell me who was so efficient to open a donation account in Credit Union for poor Emily and then set up a page in facebook the same day of her death?

Original funding page in facebook (the content I copied):
Joined Facebook 12/14/2012
Native of Utah, Emilie Parker was killed in the shooting at Sandy Hook Elem. We are seeking to assist the Parkers by setting up the Emilie Parker Memorial Fund at America First Credit Union in Utah.
Description
Instructions on the Emilie Parker Memorial Account at America First Credit Union (account #5001359). For AFCU members making a transfer, select the Savings as the type of account, and the last name on the account is Parker. For non AFCU members, the AFCU routing number is 324377516. This account has been shared by several Utah media outlets and can be trusted. Thank you.

A PAYPAL account is also available if you use the email brookeprothero@yahoo.com

https://www.facebook.com/EmilieParkerFund/info “

 

that wasn't done

 

2. I think my allegation on Emily's 12/14 face book fund raising page hit the target. After I posted it, I got a reply

http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...-photo-used-sandy-hook-shooting-victim-6.html

I went to that url, the Emilie's fund raising page was disappeared. They found the flaw and disabled the site.
-----------------------
3. Weeks later, I clicked at that url, it revived. Only the join date becomes: 12/15. They corrected it to make it a reasonable story.
Obviously, it was impossible for Mr. Parker to learn his daughter’s death so quickly and let his friends in Utah to open a donation account in bank and then set up a fund raising page in Face book. All these were prepared in advance.

 

you don't have any ground to stand on

your silly assertions have repeatedly been shot down

sandy hook is over, it was no hoax

 

Other people noticed that and have taken a screen shot.

12/14/ facebook



The page dated 12/14 until January when I copied the content then disappeared after I recommending it.

12/15


A new page appeared in same url sometime later(after January, I suppose) with the join date: 12/15.

The article about Emilie’s fund raising.

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-co...he-curious-case-of-emilie-parker-2558804.html

 

why do you keep posting stuff that was debunked long ago?

 

When they found a fund raising page on 12/14 was a flaw, they created some case like this one.

It's easy to create such a page at the purpose to prove "Alter the date is easy".
Did the Robbie Parker's friend had motive to alter the page set up date?

This information and other similar ones obviously were made by the "disinformation workshop" to cover up the flaw of Emilie's fund raising page. It was impossible for Mr. Parker doing all this on 12/14. The police blocked people to entering the school. They moved the dead people out at night. How could Robbie Parker confirm his daughter's death that day then to inform his friends in UTAH then to open a donation account in bank then to set up a fund raising page in facebook?

They planned all this in advance, think it was natural that Mr. Parker should know Emilie's death right on that day. Only found it's impossible in practice.

Watch the disinformation was issued in January, that's a later remedial measure to cover up the flaw.

 

that was debunked long ago

 

[video=youtube;B6rAMH06yQU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6rAMH06yQU&feature=player_embedded [/video]

nurse hid steps away from the shooter

Some children and a teacher hid in a room; School nurse Sally said she hid under a desk until 1:15 which means Police until 1:15 didn’t know if there was any survivor inside school, how could they not deploy ambulance at school for possible casualty? Obviously they determined in advance that no witness should be out alive.

How could Robbie Parker know his daughter was dead at that time? And then let his friends in Utah know this (about the whole story of shooting out) and then to open a donation account for Emilie in bank and then to establish a page in Face book? It was all pre-planned, only proved not practical in reality, so they had to delete that fund raising account in Face book (date 12-14) and month later had another one in same url which dated 12-15 to cover up the flaw.

 

No,no and NO

 

Why isn't there a section on this board for Crackpot Theories?

 

what are you talking about?

 

just responding to the O/P's screed

 

then why did you quote my comment and say no 3 times?

 

I didn't...look again

 

Why did the suspect vehicle come back as belonging to a Christopher Rodia?

 

Christopher Rodia is what happens when an idiot with a Sherlock Holmes hat and thinks his internet connection makes him a criminal investigator.

http://joequinn.net/2013/01/11/sand...r-rodia-most-conspiracy-theorists-cant-think/

http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Police-No-Newtown-conspiracy-4162391.php

and of course:

http://cspsandyhookreport.ct.gov/

 

What's your position on this? Why didn't Lanza or whomever come back as the operator of the suspect vehicle. No one did, but Rodia.

 

Please provide your evidence that "no one but Rodia" came up as the owner of the vehicle.

I gave you evidence of why you think that Rodia came up as the owner of the vehicle, and I gave you evidence of who actually was the owner of the vehicle. Clearly what I didn't give you was the will to actually review the evidence.

 

Who's the owner? LT. Vance said it was a relative of Adam's. Certainly Adam's mother is his mother, not just a relative. You offered some silly blogs who posted denials and ignored the real details. Was the request to run the suspect vehicle ignored, or did it simply come back as Rodia?

 

The Connecticut Post is not a "silly blog" It's a 100 year old newspaper.

And you somehow managed to skip over the entire database of the investigation.

Have you even read the report?