Saudi Officials Supported 9/11 Terrorists

Discussion in '9/11' started by longknife, May 13, 2016.

  1. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    68,271
    Likes Received:
    11,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Saudis pulled OBL's citizenship and declared AQ a terrorist organization in 1994.. so 9-11 was in part revenge to give the attack a Saudi face and turn Americans against KSA.

    Sadly, we have many conspiracy theorist who still think the Saudis did it or the Bush administration did it.
     
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There were many players in the 911 playbook, some major some minor. It appears the Saudi role was very minor--approving visas and providing patsy hijackers and their papers.

    The Bush and Israeli players were major.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You're playing dumb about the proof that hijackers didn't do it (see info in above link).

    http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
    (excerpt)
    ------------------------------------
    9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
    ------------------------------------

    You're not fooling any viewers who take the time to look at it.
     
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,117
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    you just described yourself and other troofers perfectly ...
     
  5. Mandelus

    Mandelus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Messages:
    9,593
    Likes Received:
    1,710
    Trophy Points:
    113


    What list of nonsense...

    Simple question: What hits the Pentagon?
     
  6. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How does it really matter what hit it?

    The mission was accomplished is all that matters.
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I don't know how many times I've addressed this on this forum. Here are some of the links.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=477904&page=13&p=1066776319#post1066776319
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=482175&p=1066780017#post1066780017
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=482175&p=1066780070#post1066780070
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=482175&p=1066780237#post1066780237
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=482175&page=2&p=1066780302#post1066780302
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=482175&page=2&p=1066782729#post1066782729


    Whatever happened there, a 757 didn't hit it. A smaller craft may have hit it, or there may have been planted explosives.

    Remember that your playing dumb about this mountain of proof doesn't keep the viewers from looking at it.

    http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
    (excerpt)
    ------------------------------------
    9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
    ------------------------------------
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're absolutely right, don't even bother. I'm sure you didn't.
     
  9. Mandelus

    Mandelus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Messages:
    9,593
    Likes Received:
    1,710
    Trophy Points:
    113


    Still unanswered ... WHAT HIT THE PENTAGON IF NOT THE BOING?

    There is not a single proof ... nothing ... only more or less well constructed BS and you are fooled by this idiots that this is the truth!

    Everything ... really everything was refuted, but because not accepted people like you troll still around tell people this BS. Sorry man...

    Until you don't answer correctly and in detail what alternative hits the Pentagon with proof that possible in all aspects, EVERYTHING ELSE is only bla bla bla ...
     
  10. Mandelus

    Mandelus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Messages:
    9,593
    Likes Received:
    1,710
    Trophy Points:
    113

    How can anyone claim it was no Boing ... and then telling it does not matter what it is? Hello?

    No possible alternative to the Boing delivers = it was the Boing = end of any further discussion, because conspiracy BS failed! So simple it is!
     
  11. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
    If you seriously believe what you say, you need to learn basic logic. I think you're just trying to mislead the viewers who haven't taken the time to look at the proof that no 757 hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=456423&page=17&p=1066991665#post1066991665


    I know you people will never admit anything but if you have to address basic issues, you have to say some pretty lame things to maintain your positions and those lame things, such as your above post, destroy your credibility and the viewers know what you are.
    http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
    http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html
    https://openheartedrebel.com/2012/0...-confessions-of-a-paid-disinformation-poster/
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Basic logic? How about common sense Scott? How about you address this post from the other thread and tell me why they chose Plan 2 over Plan 1.

     
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have you ever heard of the "process of elimination" in solving a problem? It is a valid process, practiced by many attempting to solve a problem.

    In this case, an airliner, AA77 a Boeing, is eliminated as the flying object (assuming there was a flying object at the pentagon) for several reasons. In the first place, there is nothing there that even looks like a Boeing, besides some obviously prominently placed scraps of painted aluminum. Wrong landing gear, wrong engines, no airliner seats, etc.

    Secondly, if one assumes the several video frames provided by the government from the parking lot video camera are true and correct, then the object shown in those frames is far too small to be a 757. Sorry dude.

    And since it was not AA77, who really gives a damn about what it actually was. Yes, I would love to know, but because of "national security" and government secrecy, we will never know.
     
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Jonathan Cole and David Chandler both disagree with you.
    http://911speakout.org/plane-at-the-pentagon-b/
     
  16. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
  17. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That's all you've got? Nothing about the evidence provided and a change in what was believed by prominent, "expert" truthers such as Chandler, Cole, and Legge?

    Interesting...
     
  18. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No Gamolon, the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory is utterly impossible, and contradicted by many, perhaps all, the facts available. And that doesn't count the facts suppressed by the government, like the entire forensic scene at WTC.

    I don't believe the statements of "experts" who earn their living on government contracts. Their bias is obvious--they are effectively sycophants for the government.

    It's experts like Dennis Cimino and those over at Pilots For Truth or Architects & Engineers that influence my decisions. People interested only in the truth.
     
  19. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,117
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    not according to Bobby's 28 redacted pages ... show your evidence of Bush and Israel or fold your cards ... truthers are shameless liars ...
     
  20. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Talk about shameless liars, the 28 now declassified pages are not mine, I didn't invent them. I keep telling you to check the mirror before you falsely accuse others of what you do.
     

Share This Page