Schiff crushes false assertions from GOPer's in letter to colleagues.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Lee Atwater, Oct 17, 2019.

  1. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    19,516
    Likes Received:
    9,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    IOW, you are able to offer nothing to show what he said is false. You have no example of a Repub congressperson on one of the 3 pertinent committees saying they were not allowed to attend the depositions, ask questions, have staff ask questions, or not get equal time.
    You can waste time trying to wordsmith your way around the truth like a good Trumpette. Or you can face the reality that nothing about the House process has been unfair. The choice is your's.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  2. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    19,516
    Likes Received:
    9,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You might as well be talking to a doorknob. Either they get it and won't admit it, or they are confused.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  3. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    90,012
    Likes Received:
    21,867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, another one of the media's false narratives. He came out and said the media misconstrued what he said. If you took the time to read what I posted you would see what he meant, not what the media is creating. Sondland, the President of Ukraine, Volker, etc., have all said no quid pro quo.

    Let's just hope the Independents don't fall for the democrat lies.
     
    ButterBalls, HB Surfer and TBLee like this.
  4. opion8d

    opion8d Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    5,098
    Likes Received:
    3,894
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is that why he sends Trump love letters?
     
  5. struth

    struth Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    16,981
    Likes Received:
    7,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Spanish Inquistion...meets the dnc
     
    HB Surfer likes this.
  6. carlberky

    carlberky Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2019
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    225
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    And the Republicans on the committee just sit on their hands and have no rebuttal. Get real.
     
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    90,012
    Likes Received:
    21,867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. But what does the dem media quote? The dem clown show narrative.

    Rep. Mark Meadows: "To date, every single witness, every single fact, has not supported any aid pause or hold-up in foreign aid being attached to any conditions, and that's been consistent with every witness that we've heard from."
     
  8. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    27,988
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because she destroyed the evidence, then the devices that held the evidence.... and that is exactly what happened.
     
  9. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    27,988
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol... are you in the market for a bridge? Perhaps some ocean front property... in Nevada?
     
  10. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    27,988
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We have an Orwellian media now that is part of the Democratic Party. It's some real weird times.
     
    Hoosier8 likes this.
  11. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    27,988
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah... this is become so out of control Secret Impeachment is a first in U.S. History. That along with an Orwellian media puts the Democrats right in line with Soviet style government.
     
    struth likes this.
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    90,012
    Likes Received:
    21,867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course not a first in tyrannical governments.
     
    struth likes this.
  13. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    20,412
    Likes Received:
    9,781
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think they are harder to fool, or they would be Democrats ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    54,847
    Likes Received:
    5,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I just don’t dwell in an alternate reality, like trumpets seem to.
     
  15. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    35,676
    Likes Received:
    27,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not my problem if you do not have any subject matter knowledge when it comes to investigations and due process.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  16. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,003
    Likes Received:
    8,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ya mean the way Trey Gowdy did for years?
     
  17. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An impeachment inquiry that hasn't been formalized by a vote is an abuse of power, and subject to lawsuits by those being abused by the process.

    It's not a "big nothing". It's more like a kangaroo court, masquerading as an impeachment inquiry.
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2019
  18. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    22,476
    Likes Received:
    2,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmmm...reminds me of President Trump (who, according to trumpers, never lies) who wouldn't recognize the truth if he tripped over it.
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2019
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  19. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    35,676
    Likes Received:
    27,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NOTHING requires a "formal vote" so that is just a load of extremist rightwing DISINFORMATION.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  20. rahl

    rahl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    54,847
    Likes Received:
    5,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote the constitution or house rules that require a vote to hold an inquiry. When you can’t do that, I expect a retraction of the above stupidity.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  21. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    19,516
    Likes Received:
    9,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Even if it did happen that way...........which it didn't...........who cares? Like Mick Mulvaney said, get over it.
     
  22. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    27,988
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It did happen that way. That's not even in question. WTF?
     
  23. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    32,171
    Likes Received:
    6,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Get a judge to enforce subpoenas and find out
     
  24. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Precedent and constitutional due process requires a vote. Absent a vote, it's an abuse of power unprecedented in impeachment history.
     
  25. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    False. The right to due process begins when the inquiry begins, and extends throughout the entire process. If you want to claim that it's not an inquiry yet, then go right ahead; because you lose either way; one by proving an abuse of due process in an inquiry, the other by proving it's nothing more than a kangaroo court.

    Which is it?
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2019

Share This Page