Schiff: We Need Mueller’s Testimony So He Can Clearly Lay Out His Report To The Public

Schiff: We Need Mueller’s Testimony So He Can Clearly Lay Out His Report To The Public

Sooooooooo an unprecedented 300 pages of report wasn't clearly laying out anything? Perhaps we now understand precisely what is wrong with Schiff and Nadler and Pelosi and the radical leftist freshman class of representatives in that they are all woefully mentally slow. There is no shame in that, of course, but still it would have been nice to have known that about them up front so that the entire nation could cease taking them seriously about most things.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/...um=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+tpm-news+(TPMNews)

Isn't that an irony for you? Mentally deficient Schiff saying that the average citizen is too mentally deficient to be trusted in regards to reading the freely available report and comprehending what No Collusion actually means. Gotta love it!

 

They will never, ever, be happy. No collusion, no obstruction and no way Trump is going anywhere. They have nothing. Mueller was tasked to get information to remove Trump from office and he got nothing. It infruites Schiff to no end. So they keep on trying new angles and will do anything to keep the narrative alive.

 

Unlike you guys I'm going to make an effort to not say things that might embarrass me later. We've heard Barr's interpretation of the Mueller report and now I'll wait to hear what Mueller's interpretation is of his report. It might be a nothing-burger or it might be the sky falling for the golden shower pervert. I can hardly wait..

 

You'd think that after Mueller exonerated Trump, the Dems would want to keep him quiet, but they just keep bringing him back.

Republicans should welcome this though. Let Meuller tell the Dems verbally that he's exonerated.

 

Nevermind the fact that the report never exonerated him. LOL

 

"Exonerate" is written clear as day on the report.

 

“If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”

 

Qoute me the section where Mueller stated he exonerated him.

 

See, this is where you guys got it all screwed up. Barr has proven to be nothing more than one of trump's puppets. All you know about the Mueller report is what Barr has told you. Have you ever wondered if Barr stretched the truth so far that he actually lied to cover for trump? I have. Let's all be patient and see ifd Mueller's report is the same as Barr's or not.

 

I have heard about the report for too long and from too many people. I know what's in the report and so does 90% of the people in the USA. But once the dems contracted TDS there is no cure for them. Let the circus began. Who the hell is stupid enough to watch.

 

Obviously, that isn't true.
Trump voter surprised to learn about key Mueller report revelations
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-...ed-learn-about-key-mueller-report-revelations

Consumers of right wing media are often surprised to learn the truth. Unfortunately, not enough ever do.

 

LOL -- Go ahead and watch and then give us a report on the revelations we are so ignorant of. Heck, after your report Mueller might even learn something.

 

It also found no chargeable offenses and no collusion, which is as close to exonerated as a prosecutor ever gets.

 

I don't think this worked out like Schiff-less pictured it.

Jordan to Mueller: Why wasn’t Joseph Mifsud charged with obstruction?



Politico: Americans getting more skeptical about the Mueller probe, for some reason.

Jordan highlights the curious case of Joseph Mifsud in the Russia-collusion saga, whose name comes up 87 times in Mueller’s report, included repeated references to his lying to investigators.

And yet, when Jordan asks why the FBI didn’t charge Mifsud for lying as he did with Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, and Paul Manafort, Mueller can’t immediately recall Mifsud or his role. When his memory gets refreshed, Mueller can’t offer any explanation for their decision not to press charges either:

Why wasn’t Mifsud charged with the same crime as Papadopoulos? After all, they later got Papadopoulos to admit he’d lied and to cooperate with investigators. That would have cured the defects listed in this summary and allowed prosecutors to dig deeper into Mifsud, but they just let the matter drop. Mueller had no answer for this, and tried to claim that he couldn’t discuss declination and charging decisions. “It’s obvious, I think,” Mueller told Jordan, “that we can’t get into charging decisions.”
Excuse me? His report exists because the statute requires Mueller to explain his charging and declination decisions. Mueller had no trouble indicting thirteen Russians no one ever heard of. Why not Mifsud? Mueller won’t say.

 

Because if pressed or pushed Mifsud would have told the truth regarding his activities and then not only would the entire Trump/Russia hoax have collapsed before their eyes but the Obama administration would have been under fire. RINO Mueller was essentially working for the DNC.

 

If you read through this post it clearly indicates the conservatives got it right but the liberals again embarrassed themselves. They never learn. But I guess there is no cure for TDS.

 

If you read the first sentence of the thread............."Sooooooooo an unprecedented 300 pages of report wasn't clearly laying out anything?".................it clearly indicates the OP was unaware of the irony of what he wrote.
The 448 page report, not 300 pages, does lay out................

The Russians, in a "sweeping and systematic fashion," criminally interfered with our election to get Vlad's favorite candidate elected.
The Trump campaign was aware of those efforts by Russians, openly encouraged them, and solicited their help.
The Liar-in-Chief lied to cover up an attempt to work with the Russian government in order to obtain dirt on Hillary.
He told his lawyer to lie about work on financial entanglements with the Kremlin that transpired during the campaign.
He tried, in multiple ways, to subvert and disrupt a federal investigation in to said Russian interference as well as contacts between members of the campaign and Russians. The legal term for that is obstruction of justice.

..................but thanks to Billy the Bagman's lies, Trump's lies, and right wing media's lies conservatives got it completely wrong.

 

Dream on . . .

 

Your reply offers all the factual substance I've come to expect from Trumpers.

 

Prosecutors don't exonerate. They investigate whether a crime was committed and who committed it. Since Mueller didn't report a crime, his story has come to an end without an accusation. From Trump's perspective, that's as good as being exonerated ,,, even though there hasn't been a trial.

That Democrats and never Trumper Republicans won't let it go is simply politics that offers nothing relative to the facts.

 

It is getting to the point where the DNC could be culpable for a class action fraud suit to be brought.

Mueller's firewall is gone and there is no where to hide.

 

100% correct. Poor dems are still trying though.

 

Actually, it goes beyond politics. It has damaged the institutions that were supposed to have been neutral into partisan entities.

The Roger Stone raid was right out of the Gestapo manual.

 

It looked to me that Schiff was sucking on lemon juice.

 

Based on that performance I'm not sure mueller could properly lay out his underwear let alone the report most of which he clearly did not remember.