SCOTUS Flips Trump the Bird

Sorry to clue you but in case you're still unaware your opinion is not based on reality according to just about everyone who is in a position to know. I may not be an authority on this but contrary to your false claim, I discredited your legal fallacies in this forum well before SCOTUS did, using nearly the exact same arguments SCOTUS used in their opinion. If you remember correctly, I said the State of Texas has no standing based on Article III limitations of powers granted to the federal judiciary and prohibited by the 10th Amendment. Although SCOTUS does not mention the 10th Amendment it's pretty clear that it is the wall that prevents SCOTUS from granting certiorari in this case. And therefore my opinion of your opinion stands, irrelevant or not to you. And my opinion of the case in question is well supported by not only experts in constitutional law but by the self described ultimate authority on the Constitution, the Supreme Court. No amount of dancing on your part changes any of that. In fact, I've read and heard many opinions on this and I have yet to come across any from any constitutional scholar that agrees with you. Bottom line, your opinions are not based on knowledge or fact, more like misconceptions and/or convoluted logic.